The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 00:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Almost patent nonsense. Nobody measures years in "bimillenniums", and seeing as how we are only five years into this one, it's pretty much lacking all of its content. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 03:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I have bundled the AFDs for 2nd bimillennium and bimillennium. There is also Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Bimillenniums. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:05Z

• Delete per nom Melchoir 03:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Sheeeeeeesh. bikeable (talk) 03:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - there's also Bimillennium and Category:Bimillenniums ×Meegs 04:07, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete the lot of 'em. Pburka 04:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• See Wikipedia:Timeline_standards for precedents and what this article would intend to follow. -- Perfecto 05:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following was for Bimillennium only (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimillennium). —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:05Z

Delete. Non-notable concept, unless there's something commonly measured in bimillenniums. I can't imagine there is. Grandmasterka 07:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Recreate when historians and the like begin to refer to bimillennums on a regular basis. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 07:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • correction, delete both. -- Saberwyn

AFDs were bundled at this point. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:07Z

• Delete all per above comments. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:06Z
• Delete all bimillenniumcruft. Gazpacho 08:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination. Semiconscious · talk 09:50, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete random hobbyhorse. CalJW 14:55, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. Any list of events that includes "The September 11,2001 attacks came and attacked the socialists" and "some millenairists came and thought this would be a bimillennium of peaceand great" is at best weird, and at worst defined or executed in an excruciatingly bad manner. ("Attacked the socialists"? Really?) And, as noted, this unit of time isn't actually used for any notable purpose. Bearcat 19:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all non-notable and the article hurts my brain. Themusicking 20:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete All someone is trying to coin a phrase. Good luck, but this isn't the right place to do it. (Signed: J.Smith) 23:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete both and speedy delete any related neologisms that pop up (trimillenium, quadrimillenium) --Revolución (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. KramarDanIkabu 18:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with extreme prejudice. AnonMoos 15:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.