The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I see a consensus to Delete this article. If changes to the industry arise out of this accident, perhaps this decision can be revisited. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Delta Air Lines tire explosion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:NOTNEWS additionally, although uncommon the amount of fatalities is not notable, unless this has lasting effects i beleive this should be deleted or merged. Lolzer3000 (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lolzer3000 (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There were casualties in this event and there are no source or GNG issues here. Nate • (chatter) 20:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  W nate Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I think I personally built it well and there is no reason for deletion. Fatal tire explosions are rare and one with multiple deaths or injuries is not something to be deleted. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 23:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment yes i agree you built this article well, however, I highly doubt this incident will survive beyond a week or 3-day news cycle, coverage has already severely died down which could fail WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. I believe this because the sources you cited are only mostly local and only 1 (the new york post) is national.

also, the sources you cited are only primary sources and tertiary sources, there is a lack of secondary sources here. [1] does not turn up anything and is just a invalid search query. Lolzer3000 (talk) 23:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I guess your right but I didn't add that source Bloxzge 025 (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment yes, you did add that source, its the second source you included in this article. Lolzer3000 (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an invalid search and actually if you just look at the edit history you can see it was added by user Ivebeenhacked Bloxzge 025 (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The only reason I didn't really work hard on this article is because I had a doubt that this article would in fact be notable or even pass WP:CONTINUEDCOVERAGE. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 00:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Georgia (U.S. state). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:36, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and WP:EVENTCRIT #4: Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, [...] – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable [...]. Rosbif73 (talk) 14:14, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete — Boeing's manufacturing issues are a routine occurrence. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 06:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There's something in the fact that it did not occur in the direct context of a flight that makes it non-notable, not to mention that a big chunk of the article is a litany of WP:QUOTEFARM and WP:NEWSPAPER reactions. Borgenland (talk) 14:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per reasons stated by Borgenland. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 00:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination and WP:EVENTCRIT. ‹hamster717🐉› ^{(discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠)} 12:40, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I was a bit surprised to see this one here, as at face value, it does appear notable. However when I look at EVENTCRIT closely, I don't see this passing the bar. I wouldn't have nominated this, and it's far from the least notable incident to exist on Wikipedia, but if it's being put to a vote, I lean toward delete over keep. Honestly, the facts are far too simple to expand beyond what's there. If it had not resulted in a fatality, this would be considered routine. Tragedy does not necessitate an article. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.