Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain me where is the "unhelpful" in this edit? thanks. Fma12 (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, adding the team name on a page is not an "unhelpful" edit such as you stated on the edit summary. I've been recently doing lot of edits on NCAA teams, all of them in good faith. But if you disagree with some of the changes made you just talk me and we can discuss it. But reverting arbitrarily with no further reason is totally disruptive from your part.Fma12 (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		For your work on the Brian Thompson article, for being bold enough to remove contentious material MWFwiki (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MWFwiki (talk) 23:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my edits to Music of Turkmenistan "because they did not appear constructive" strikes me as odd. I researched several sources on Turkmen music, added those citations, condensed several pages of text into a relatively compact volume of text. I then asked two Turkmen musicians to review the edits; they approved of them. I added a section on modern classical music, another on modern pop music, and expanded the classical folk section to include a condensed synopsis I composed based on the standard text on Turkmen folk music, the 1928 book by Uspenskiy and Belyayev. I respectfully request that you revert your reversion of my additions. Allan Mustard, former U.S. ambassador to Turkmenistan (2015-2019). 108.18.142.221 (talk) 01:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel I made an error then you can revert my edit. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 14:50, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will. 108.18.142.221 (talk) 15:43, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why were the edites clarifieng at Thomas view on the defects of Chrost body removed, when at Thomas believed that Christ body had defects and wasn't the most perfect. 73.87.130.123 (talk) 20:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be inserting unsourced commentary. Please disucss on the relevant talk pages to ensure there is consensus for your insertions. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 20:57, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]