Hi Razgura! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:57, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:آرش_زره‌تن_لهونی to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:40, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

. Razgura (talk) 08:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:در_آغوش_درخت to Dar Aghooshe Derakht. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:03, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But I wrote in the edit summary! Razgura (talk) 08:23, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from fa:طوبی_(مجموعه_تلویزیونی) to Tooba (TV series). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 October 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Abbas Nilforoushan, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 21:51, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Breakfast with Giraffes. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Razgura (talk) 06:47, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Saeed Khani (producer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Camilear (talk) 13:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK Razgura (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Mehrdad New York. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mahyar Ayyar, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:11, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1952 DC-3 Plane Crash in Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and more inline citations as there are numerous unsourced paragraphs and sections. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Iran: Allegations of manipulated economic data. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it reads like an essay rather than an encyclopedia article. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Razgura. Thank you for your work on Tehran water shortage inequality. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice work. Probably needs a title change to "Tehran water shortage" which is what the overall article is about

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air pollution in Iran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SO2. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:49, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption, a special set of rules apply to anyone editing in this topic area. Specifically, only extended confirmed editors are allowed to make direct edits and page creations to this topic area. Since you currently do not meet the requirements to contribute to this topic area, the page you created has been nominated for speedy deletion under G5.

If you think this page does not fall under the general sanctions described, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally you may wish to read about the topic restrictions here.

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:44, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Like I said in the AfD, I wanted to leave some suggestions for improving Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I think you've done good work on the article so far and obviously you should take all of my suggestions with a grain of salt, but since you asked for feedback I wanted to leave some ideas that you might find helpful.

My main concern is there are a few sections in the article where I don't really understand what the “allegations of manipulated economic data" being referenced are, particularly the sections on defence and academic degrees. And there are still several places where you seem to make your own accusations of data manipulation by placing statistics alongside each other (see WP:OR, WP:SYNTH). So I think the main thing you need to do is to stick much more closely to what is actually said in reliable secondary sources. What precise allegations of manipulated economic data have been made? Who has made each allegation, and what is their evidence? You also need to consider the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view. Does Iran deny the allegations? What do reliable sources say about the credibility of the claims?

I think the article in general would benefit from having a rough structure in each section much more like: “The Iranian government says [claim about economic data]. X has alleged that [claim] is [inflated/false/manipulated], citing [evidence]. These allegations have been judged [credible/not credible] by [insert reliable sources].” At the moment the article reads much more like an argumentative essay, where you’re bringing together different pieces of evidence to support your contention that Iran’s economic data is manipulated.

For instance, this sentence from the article is a really good example of what you should be aiming for: Similarly, former President Hassan Rouhani's claim of 7.4% economic growth during his tenure was met with skepticism from Iranian economists and lawmakers. Critics contended that the reported figures did not align with industrial output or employment trends. (my only suggestion would here be to add a few more specifics from your cited source, like who the economists, lawmakers and critics actually are).

Whereas I don't understand the relevance of this paragraph at all. What is the allegation of manipulated economic data in this section, and who is making it? Iran suffers from over-education and over-supply of academic degrees. In 2015–2016, over 4.3 million students were enrolled in universities in Iran, which accounts for more than 5% of the country's total population, or 7.4% of its adult population (aged 19 and above). In comparison, in 2016, 20.4 million students, or a little over 6% of the U.S. population (8.3% of the U.S. adult population aged 19 and above), attended college. The U.S. economy was then approximately 47 times that of Iran's, and many of the graduates from U.S. colleges and universities were foreign nationals, who will likely contribute to the labor forces of their home countries.

I hope this helps, and like I said, I think you’ve done a good job on this article, so don’t be discouraged if it ends up being draftified — it just means you get a bit more time to develop it in draftspace. MCE89 (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MCE89 Thank you for your considerate and detailed feedback! And of course thank you for all your encouragement. It is so nice to receive constructive criticism from someone who genuinely wants to help. I will try to work on it more according to your suggestions. Thank you Razgura (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Allegations of manipulated economic data in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of the result of its AfD. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CR (talk) 14:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]