Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Emil Schnell.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "non-free content" and I did NOT upload it under that banner, it has been published by the German Bundestag with explicit permission to be freely used in non-commercial settings: "Dieses Bild darf für private und kommerzielle nicht-werbliche Zwecke genutzt werden." Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Klaus Reichenbach 1990.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "non-free content" and I did NOT upload it under that banner; it has been published by the German Bundestag with explicit permission to be freely used in non-commercial settings: "Dieses Bild darf für private und kommerzielle nicht-werbliche Zwecke genutzt werden." Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Klaus Thielmann you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 23:02, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Klaus Thielmann you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Klaus Thielmann for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 03:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you can fix up a few references as brought up in the review of Klaus Thielmann I can pass the article. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll let you know when it's done. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I added a source for the Sorbian School and clarified the Bezirk comment, I hope that is all. Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 22:57, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright thank you. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Klaus Thielmann you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Klaus Thielmann for comments about the article, and Talk:Klaus Thielmann/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 23:25, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jürgen Kleditzsch you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 02:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jürgen Kleditzsch you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jürgen Kleditzsch for comments about the article, and Talk:Jürgen Kleditzsch/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of History6042 -- History6042 (talk) 13:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Klaus Reichenbach 1990.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

• state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
• add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Ирука¹³ 08:39, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Heinz Vietze you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spartathenian -- Spartathenian (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heinz Vietze you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article needs changes or clarifications to meet the good article criteria. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Heinz Vietze and Talk:Heinz Vietze/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spartathenian -- Spartathenian (talk) 21:03, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've already self-reverted, but apologies - I briefly removed your existing GA noms because I mistakenly read your status as fully indef blocked. I've rolled myself back and this won't affect their position in the queue, but I assume you'll see it in your watchlist and wonder what I was doing. I'm sorry about that. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Heinz Vietze you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Heinz Vietze for comments about the article, and Talk:Heinz Vietze/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spartathenian -- Spartathenian (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Herbert Kroker.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Emil Schnell.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a copyright violation of https://bilddatenbank.bundestag.de/site/picture-detail?id=1123537 and has no credible claim of fair use or permission. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:23, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What you are doing is borderline trolling. You're doing mass deletes of my files, all of which were upload with full NFCC documentation, with ZERO chance or time on all of them, regardless of criteria, to "Contest this speedy deletion", which I believe to be in violation of Wikipedia rules. You are threatening to block me for uploading pictures that literally read on their source descriptor page "Dieses Bild darf für private und kommerzielle nicht-werbliche Zwecke genutzt werden. Die Verwendung des Bildes in sozialen Medien ist gestattet.". Maxwhollymoralground (talk) 20:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not accept licensing that restricts commercial use. The Schnell photo was not uploaded as non-free content and its terms of use restrict commercial reuse. As for the ones that were uploadedas non-free, the ones deleted are from Imago, a commercial photo licensing agency. These fail WP:NFCC#2 and are subject to speedy deletion per WP:F7. -- Whpq (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Manfred Uschner 1994.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Heinz Ziegner (SED) in Trondheim.webp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:28, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:1996 Berlin-Brandenburg fusion referendum advertisement.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]