SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
17		Mustapha Khalid Palash (talk)	Add sources
16		Root carving (talk)	Add sources
67		Renewable Energy Certificate (United States) (talk)	Add sources
195		Mockup (talk)	Add sources
103		Shot peening (talk)	Add sources
1,105		Computer-aided design (talk)	Add sources
15		Financial incentives for photovoltaics (talk)	Cleanup
21		Lakhan Thapa (talk)	Cleanup
374		Oxy-fuel welding and cutting (talk)	Cleanup
4		Tobago United F.C. (talk)	Expand
11		Blue Hills Ski Area (talk)	Expand
1,532		Rich Communication Services (talk)	Expand
191		Telephone numbers in Hong Kong (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
584		Social psychology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
343		Lost television broadcast (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
356		Fatigue (material) (talk)	Merge
7,734		Kennedy family (talk)	Merge
966		Idly Kadai (talk)	Merge
1,112		Theory of mind (talk)	Wikify
19		Renewable portfolio standards in the United States (talk)	Wikify
62		Solar power in California (talk)	Wikify
4		And Then Came Fall (talk)	Orphan
4		Abdur Rahim Popalzai (talk)	Orphan
2		Abdulrasaq Wuraola (talk)	Orphan
3		Shanghai University station (talk)	Stub
5		Brown's Inlet (talk)	Stub
3		Elio Augusto Di Carlo (talk)	Stub
4		Secondary polynomials (talk)	Stub
5		DC/Wildstorm: DreamWar (talk)	Stub
31		Walnut Hills, Cincinnati (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Notcharizard was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It is very strange to cite an article on the school being sued, and only mention from the article that celebrities are involved with the school. This strongly suggests the writer had no interest in writing a neutral article summarising secondary sources, which is the purpose of Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curtis School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- NotCharizard ^🗨 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangoflies! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- NotCharizard 🗨 00:28, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Referencing for beginners on how to format references. Refs should not be just URLs. A good approach is to create refs in your Sandbox, only copying into a draft or article when satisfied with the format. David notMD (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangoflies! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Feedback on draft article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:42, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mangoflies! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Nothing to write about, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of events). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Middle Eastern Airlines Flight 444 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 21:14, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Palisades Fire, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:36, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mangoflies (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. You should clarify which pages you think should be merged, on your merge tag, as it is incomplete. GoodDay (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:GoodDay. I am new to the formatting and wikitext. Would you be able to assit in making the merge tag?

--- Mangoflies (talk) 06:12, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Middle School Public Debate Program requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to be building up the article over the course of a few days, consider working on it in a draft instead? TornadoLGS (talk) 20:21, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few updates to it, and will be significantly more detailed today. Thanks. —- Mangoflies (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the speedy deletion tag since the article has been expanded, and A1 no longer applies. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mangoflies

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kudpung, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Middle School Public Debate Program, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:13, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middle School Public Debate Program is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle School Public Debate Program until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JFHJr (㊟) 01:18, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ethics policy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethics policy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JFHJr (㊟) 03:51, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]