Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nesil Caliskan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 20:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K20646! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 20:23, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Assam Provincial Muslim League. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 14:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Deputy Foreign Secretary. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Previously deleted by blocked or banned user.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CNMall41 (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Nesil Caliskan instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

If I had caught this earlier I would have accepted. Glad you were able to make the article regardless.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nesil Caliskan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 01:01, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Mohammad Hijab has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Hijab

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hadal (talk) 03:42, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K20646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Assam Provincial Muslim League (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, K20646. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deputy Foreign Secretary 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Boris Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Czello ^(music) 13:24, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Uthman Ibn Farooq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article on Uthman Ibn Farooq fails to meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines WP:GNG for inclusion. The subject's coverage in reliable, secondary sources appears to be insufficiently substantial and independent of promotional or self-published content. While he has a presence on platforms like YouTube and TikTok, the majority of the references cited either derive from websites of questionable reliability or are focused on basic videos or statistical data (e.g., subscriber count, views) and not substantive biographical or critical coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codonified (talk) 12:48, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do not take out deletion tag without prior consensus, such acts are disruptive and violate the policies of wikipedia Codonified (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Uthman Ibn Farooq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uthman Ibn Farooq. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:34, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to List of American Muslims. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have engaged in an edit war based on the reverts you have made on Daniel Haqiqatjou. This means that you have been repeatedly changing the article back to how you think it should be, even though multiple editors have objected to the content which you have changed or added to the article. Users are expected to discuss with others, avoid editing disruptively, and reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you perform or how often you perform reverts.
2. Edit warring in and of itself violates Wikipedia policy, but it can be highly disruptive if it involves the addition of content without verifying it, content based on outdated sources, and original research into articles, and this entails multiple violations of Wikipedia policies.
3. Undoing another user's edit, in whole or in part, involving the same or different material, and whether performed using undo, rollback, or done so completely manually counts as a revert.

The bottom line is: avoid edit warring even if you believe that your reverts are justified and that there is nothing wrong with the article the way you think it should be. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing or the page you are performing reverts on may be locked. HyperShark244 (talk) 05:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]