Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot complete AFD for Jyoti Singh (judge) JudgeMistry (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! It looks like instead of putting the subst keyword in the wrong place. It should have been {{subst:afd2 | pg=Jyoti Singh (judge) | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~. I've cleaned it up manually and completed the listing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion will run its course but your rationale for the nomination is mistaken. You could, for instance, say that the article does not show the judge meets notability criteria for a Wikipedia and that you have done additional research in an effort to determine whether additional source exist that might be used. But our criteria for notability for public officials, including judges, say that a judge sitting on the highest court at a state level may well be presumed to be notable. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both editors for your helpful comments and valuable assistance. JudgeMistry (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]