Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

These are to extra definitions of Grey Box rather than similar articles.

Hi BillWhiten, I can't explain why the person at 109.144.177.32 wants to remove all the links. Wikipedia provides a forum for you to basically get a good idea out there, as long as you can achieve consensus with people who are looking at it. There's definitely a bias against people who don't establish a username. Please see WP:3rr and WP:BRD for some discussion about how conflicts get resolved on Wikipedia.

Is "grey box" regarded as controversial? Are there individuals you could think of who think it's an idea that shouldn't be presented in this way?

Good luck, E.S. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SocraticOath (talk • contribs) 13:27, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your edits give the appearance of promoting your own work. Promoting your own work is a WP:Conflict of interest, and is against Wikipedia policy. I have reverted three edits. I also suspect that the main article needs revising, as per the article Talk.  SolidPhase (talk) 22:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is not much literature available on general, as apposed to special, grey box methods. The page attempts to cover the range of methods available with references. The techniques described are widely applicable, as almost all modelling involves grey box type models, but are generally little known. For instance see limited details given in “Numerical Recipies” book. The question should be are the references relevant. The page remained unreferenced for over a year. Hopefully others will be able to add references to other relevant work onto the page. I note that I gain no benefits from this page. As I see it any benefits go to those how make use of the information given. BillWhiten (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]