I'm working on a system that uses two AI models—DeBERTA (a text classification AI) and Gemma (a large language model, the open-source version of Google Gemini)—to evaluate Wikipedia usernames and decide if they violate the username policy. Both of them have been transfer learned by me for this task.

DeBERTA gives a "risk score" (from 0 to 100) for each username, showing how likely it is to break the rules. Gemma then suggests what action to take based on the risk score. Only usernames with a DeBERTA score above 90 get sent to Gemma for further review and action recommendations.

DeBERTA is good at quickly deciding whether a username breaks the rules or not (it's highly accurate for binary "yes or no" tasks). But it’s not great at deciding the specific action to take because that requires a deeper understanding of the username's context and our rules.

Gemma is good at understanding context and suggesting actions, but it's not reliable for deciding if a username breaks the rules—it sometimes makes up reasons that don't make sense (a common problem with large AI models). That's why DeBERTA does the initial check, and Gemma handles the next step only if there's a real risk. For example, if a username is only slightly problematic (like being promotional), Gemma won't suggest reporting it unless the user actually edits from that account.

From a sample of username's made this week, here's what the bot would have done if it were live.

Note: The "risk scores" here are based on a DeBERTA heavily optimised to avoid false negatives at all costs and has a much higher false positive rate (because it's output is checked by Gemma before doing anything). To see a DeBERTA optimised for a balance between false positives and negatives, see User:MolecularBot/UsernameRisk.

• Obamadunghole: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.93%, Gemini Reason: The username "Obamadunghole" is blatantly offensive and profane. It uses a vulgar term combined with the name of a public figure, making it demeaning, disparaging, and likely to offend other editors. This violates the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames and warrants immediate action.
• RussiaSHITHOLE: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.92%, Gemini Reason: The username "RussiaSHITHOLE" is blatantly offensive and profane, using a derogatory term to describe a country. This violates the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames, specifically usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption and usernames that are blatantly profane.
• Jacklovescockbain: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.91%, Gemini Reason: The username "Jacklovescockbain" is sexually explicit and offensive. The term "cock" is a vulgar slang term for penis, making the username blatantly profane and likely to offend other users. This violates the disruptive or offensive usernames policy and warrants immediate action.
• Ienjoydumbshit: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.91%, Gemini Reason: Username contains profanity ('shit') in a derogatory context ('dumbshit'), violating the disruptive and offensive usernames policy. Likely to offend other users and disrupt harmonious editing.
• Yaboidoesreallyshittythings: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.90%, Gemini Reason: Username contains profanity ('shitty') and implies disruptive behavior ('does really shitty things'), violating the policy against offensive and disruptive usernames. It is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt productive processes.
• Spermmonkey420: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.89%, Gemini Reason: Username "Spermmonkey420" is highly offensive and disruptive. "Sperm" is sexually explicit and combined with "monkey" and "420" (drug reference), creates a username that is clearly intended to be provocative and violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, sexually explicit, or intended to offend and disrupt. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Ieatmypoo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.89%, Gemini Reason: The username "Ieatmypoo" is considered offensive and disruptive due to its crude and distasteful nature. It is likely to offend other editors and disrupt productive collaboration, violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames.
• Gay bukkake: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.88%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Gay bukkake' is overtly sexually explicit, violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames. It is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt the project.
• Selena gomez is worse than september 11 attacks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.87%, Gemini Reason: Username is severely offensive and disruptive. It compares a celebrity, Selena Gomez, being 'worse' than the September 11 attacks, a major tragedy. This is highly likely to offend other users, trivialize a horrific event, and disrupt productive discussions. Violates the policy against usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption, and usernames that appear intended to troll.
• Moehotshit: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.87%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the profanity "shit" and is likely to be offensive and disruptive. Violates the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames.
• BigDickSchmong: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.85%, Gemini Reason: Username is sexually explicit and likely to be offensive. Violates policy against disruptive and offensive usernames.
• TROLLEDLOSER69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.80%, Gemini Reason: Username "TROLLEDLOSER69" is considered disruptive and offensive. "TROLLEDLOSER" implies an intent to troll and demean other users by calling them "losers," which violates the policy against usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes. It also appears intended to disrupt legitimate discussions by provoking negative emotional reactions, fitting the description of trolling usernames.
• Morgan Wallen is worse than September 11 attacks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.79%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Morgan Wallen is worse than September 11 attacks' is highly offensive and disruptive. It trivializes the September 11 attacks, a major tragedy, by comparing it to a celebrity, and is likely to provoke strong negative reactions and offend other users. This falls under disruptive usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions, or make harmonious editing difficult or impossible to achieve, by referencing highly contentious events or controversies.
• Dicks,Show: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.77%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Dicks,Show' is considered offensive and disruptive due to the use of the vulgar term 'Dicks,' which is sexually suggestive and profane, violating the policy against profane and offensive usernames.
• Aorunsucks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.76%, Gemini Reason: The username "Aorunsucks" is disruptive and offensive. It expresses a negative sentiment ("sucks") targeting "Ao", which is likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes. It can be interpreted as trolling or a personal attack, violating the disruptive usernames policy. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Headifretardaemy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.76%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the highly offensive and pejorative term "retard", which demeans and disparages people with intellectual disabilities. This violates the policy against usernames that are deliberately offensive, dehumanizing, discriminatory, or contain pejorative terms. It is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt harmonious editing. Immediate action is required.
• Nutnutnutaidsballs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.76%, Gemini Reason: Username "Nutnutnutaidsballs" is disruptive and offensive. It combines potentially sexual terms with "aids," a sensitive topic, making it likely intended to offend and disrupt. Violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, offensive, and intended to disrupt productive Wikipedia processes.
• You stupid ben: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.73%, Gemini Reason: Username "You stupid ben" is a personal attack and is considered offensive and disruptive. It violates the policy against usernames that contain or imply personal attacks and are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption.
• Donnieforcock: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.71%, Gemini Reason: The username "Donnieforcock" is considered offensive and disruptive. It contains the profane and sexually explicit term "cock", violating the policy against blatantly profane or sexually explicit usernames. This username is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt productive processes.
• Walkemdownandcuttheirmeatoff: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: The username "Walkemdownandcuttheirmeatoff" is blatantly violent and threatening, violating the disruptive or offensive usernames policy. It is likely to offend other editors and disrupt productive Wikipedia processes. Immediate action is required.
• Slaveryisgood123456789: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.66%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Slaveryisgood123456789' is highly offensive and disruptive. It advocates for slavery, a system of dehumanization and oppression, violating the policy against usernames that are likely to offend, dehumanize, discriminate, or support such behavior toward any race, religion, gender, sexual identity, sexual preference, political affiliation, or social group or status. This username is clearly intended to provoke negative reactions and disrupt the community. Immediate UAA action is recommended.
• Nosetwatsaveschinks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.63%, Gemini Reason: Username contains multiple highly offensive slurs: 'twat' (sexist) and 'chink' (racist). This is a clear violation of the disruptive and offensive usernames policy, likely to offend and cause disruption. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Fucc-off-wiki-pedi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.61%, Gemini Reason: Username contains a profane and offensive phrase ("Fucc-off", a misspelling of "Fuck off"), violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames. This warrants immediate UAA report and block.
• Nosetwatsaveschinksinhca: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.59%, Gemini Reason: Username contains profanity ("twat") and a racial slur ("chink"), violating the disruptive and offensive usernames policy. This username is highly likely to offend other users and disrupt the project. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Skibidi latina lovver 69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.59%, Gemini Reason: Username is sexually suggestive and objectifies Latina women by combining 'latina lover' with '69'. This violates the policy against usernames that are likely to offend and are sexually explicit or demean a social group.
• Fuk w hon: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.52%, Gemini Reason: Username contains profanity ('Fuk' for 'fuck') and potentially a racial slur ('hon' for 'honky'). The combination 'Fuk w hon' is likely to be interpreted as offensive and disruptive, violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames.
• AllahuAnal 2025: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.37%, Gemini Reason: Username combines "Allahu", a term associated with God in Islam, with "Anal", a sexually explicit term. This combination is highly offensive, disrespectful, and violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane and likely to cause disruption. Immediate UAA report is warranted due to the severity of the offense.
• Nosetwatnorthsaveschinksinhca: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.37%, Gemini Reason: Username contains highly offensive terms. 'twat' is a profane and sexually explicit term, and 'chink' is a racial slur. Violates the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames.
• Trollist-lv: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.35%, Gemini Reason: Username implies intent to troll, which is disruptive and violates the disruptive usernames policy.
• Beenendet diese Schande mit einem Schlag Deutsche Skinheads in den Bundestag: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.25%, Gemini Reason: Username is in German and translates to "End this shame with one blow German Skinheads in the Bundestag". It promotes a contentious group (German Skinheads) and their presence in the German Parliament, which is considered offensive and disruptive due to the association of skinheads with far-right extremism and hate speech.
• Hannahthanlover69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.24%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Hannahthanlover69' is sexually suggestive due to the inclusion of '69', which is commonly associated with a sexual act. This violates the policy against usernames that are 'blatantly ... sexually explicit' and 'likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption'. Immediate UAA report is warranted as per policy for such usernames.
• Hoeslover: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.12%, Gemini Reason: Username "Hoeslover" is offensive and disruptive. It uses a derogatory term for women and is sexually suggestive and demeaning, violating the policy against usernames that are likely to offend, are sexually explicit in implication, and demean a social group (women).
• Diddylovedick: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.08%, Gemini Reason: The username "Diddylovedick" is sexually explicit and contains a profane term ("dick"), violating the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames. It is likely to offend other users.
• I cant breathe69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.05%, Gemini Reason: Username "I cant breathe69" is considered disruptive and offensive. "I can't breathe" is a phrase strongly associated with the death of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter movement, a highly contentious and sensitive topic. The username is likely to offend other contributors and cause disruption by trivializing or being insensitive to issues of racial injustice and police brutality. This falls under the policy against usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions, or make harmonious editing difficult or impossible to achieve, by referencing highly contentious events or controversies.
• GawkyWawkySlurpyWurpySlopJobWithATwist: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.75%, Gemini Reason: The username contains the highly offensive and sexually explicit term 'SlopJob', making it blatantly profane and likely to offend other users. This violates the disruptive or offensive usernames policy.
• Trollguy95: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.67%, Gemini Reason: Username "Trollguy95" is disruptive. The term "Troll" in the username implies an intention to engage in trolling behavior, which is against Wikipedia username policy as it is likely to disrupt discussions and provoke negative reactions. This falls under 'Disruptive or offensive usernames'.
• Yourkiller: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.65%, Gemini Reason: The username "Yourkiller" is considered disruptive and offensive. It is blatantly violent and threatening, violating the policy against usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption, and usernames that are blatantly violent or threatening.
• ChildEaterThey'reYummy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.34%, Gemini Reason: Username "ChildEaterThey'reYummy" is blatantly offensive and disruptive. It promotes violence and advocates for extremely immoral and potentially illegal behavior. It is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt the Wikipedia community.
• Masterbaiter231: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.18%, Gemini Reason: Username is sexually suggestive and likely to be offensive due to the clear pun on 'masturbater'. Violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane or sexually explicit.
• Pornoman1234: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.70%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Pornoman1234' is sexually explicit due to the inclusion of 'porn', which violates the policy against blatantly profane, violent, threatening, or sexually explicit usernames. This username is considered disruptive and offensive.
• FAGMK: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.70%, Gemini Reason: Username "FAGMK" contains the highly offensive and derogatory slur "FAG", which is a homophobic slur. This violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, offensive, and discriminatory towards sexual identity. It is likely to offend other contributors and disrupt harmonious editing, warranting immediate action.
• Wikitroll1066: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.48%, Gemini Reason: Username "Wikitroll1066" is clearly intended to be disruptive as it directly references "trolling", which is against the policy under "Disruptive or offensive usernames".
• Slavehunter 69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.96%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Slavehunter 69' is highly offensive and disruptive. 'Slavehunter' directly references the violent and dehumanizing practice of slavery, likely to offend and cause disruption. Violates policy against usernames that are blatantly offensive, dehumanize, and praise contentious historical practices.
• DIddydidlerthe21stofthedidlers: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.74%, Gemini Reason: The username 'DIddydidlerthe21stofthedidlers' strongly resembles 'diddler', a term associated with child sexual abuse. This is highly offensive, disruptive, and likely to provoke negative emotional reactions from other editors. It violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, violent, threatening, or sexually explicit, or that deliberately offend, dehumanize, attack, demean, disparage, discriminate, or support or advocate any such behavior. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Wimmenhitter69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.44%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Wimmenhitter69' is offensive and disruptive. 'Wimmenhitter' is interpreted as 'women hitter', implying violence against women, which violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, violent, threatening, or sexually explicit, or that deliberately offend, dehumanize, attack, demean, disparage, discriminate, or support or advocate any such behavior toward any gender or social group. The '69' further adds to the disruptive nature. This username is likely intended to provoke negative reactions and disrupt productive processes. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• Pako Pk Dick: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.32%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'Dick', a common English slang term for penis, which is considered profane and sexually suggestive. This username is likely to offend other contributors and cause disruption, violating the disruptive or offensive usernames policy.
• Pornoman12: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.80%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Pornoman12' is sexually explicit due to the inclusion of 'porno', which is a shortened form of pornography. This violates the policy against usernames that are blatantly profane, violent, threatening, or sexually explicit, and usernames likely to offend or disrupt. Immediate UAA report is warranted.
• DrabsGymsandBalls: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.60%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the potentially offensive slang term 'balls', which can be interpreted as sexually suggestive and disruptive, violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames.
• Lucmaugendregay: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.97%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Lucmaugendregay' appears to be a potentially offensive play on words, resembling 'Look, ma, you're gay'. This could be seen as mocking or derisive towards LGBTQ+ individuals and could be disruptive.
• Grammmarnazi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.80%, Gemini Reason: Username uses the term 'Nazi', which is highly offensive and associated with hate, violence, discrimination, and the Holocaust. Violates the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames.
• Your Local Cvnty Granny: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.25%, Gemini Reason: The username contains a misspelling of a highly offensive and sexually explicit term ('Cvnty' for 'cunt'). Combined with 'Granny', it creates a username that is sexually suggestive, profane, and likely to offend other contributors, violating the policy against disruptive and offensive usernames.

• Poop pee butt: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.92%, Gemini Reason: Username "Poop pee butt" is childish and mildly vulgar. While not overtly profane, it is likely to be considered offensive or disruptive to some users and unsuitable for a collaborative, professional environment like Wikipedia. It falls under the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames as it may make harmonious editing difficult. A talk page message requesting a username change is appropriate, and a UAA report should be filed if edits are made under this username after notification.
• SrPoopybutthole: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.91%, Gemini Reason: Username contains vulgar terms ('poopy' and 'butthole') and is likely to be considered offensive and disruptive. While not severely offensive, it violates the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames. A talk page message requesting a username change is appropriate initially. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report should be filed.
• Butt splitters: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.91%, Gemini Reason: The username "Butt splitters" is sexually suggestive and potentially offensive. While not overtly profane, it could be considered disruptive and may offend other editors. It falls under the category of usernames that are likely to offend or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Patmahomessucks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.90%, Gemini Reason: The username "Patmahomessucks" is disparaging and could be considered offensive as it expresses a negative sentiment towards a public figure. While not overtly profane, it can be seen as disruptive and making harmonious editing potentially difficult. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about username policy concerns. If the user edits after notification, a UAA report should be considered.
• U are super duper uber gay: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.89%, Gemini Reason: The username "U are super duper uber gay" has the potential to be offensive and disruptive as it could be interpreted as mocking or disparaging sexual identity, violating the policy against usernames that demean or disparage sexual preference. It may also be seen as trolling or intended to provoke negative reactions. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• U are super duper uber gay man uwu sogma: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.89%, Gemini Reason: The username 'U are super duper uber gay man uwu sogma' is potentially offensive and disruptive. 'gay man' combined with 'uwu' and 'sogma' (a reference to the 'sogma balls' meme) can be interpreted as mocking or trivializing homosexuality and is generally inappropriate. It may cause disruption and offend other users. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits.
• Mynacookiessuck: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.88%, Gemini Reason: The username "Mynacookiessuck" uses the word "suck" which can be considered mildly profane and potentially offensive in some contexts. While "cookies" itself is benign, the combination can be interpreted negatively and potentially disrupt productive discussions or offend other editors. Therefore, it is borderline inappropriate and requires a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• TROLLFACE587: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.88%, Gemini Reason: Username "TROLLFACE587" is potentially disruptive as "trollface" is associated with internet trolling, which is against Wikipedia's collaborative environment. While not explicitly offensive, it raises concern about the user's intent to engage constructively. Recommend a talk page message and UAA report if disruptive edits are made.
• All i knowitisyoubigzebrajerk: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.88%, Gemini Reason: The username contains 'jerk' which is mildly offensive and could be seen as disruptive, but not blatantly profane or violent. A talk page message is recommended, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification to assess potential disruption.
• Newline Media and Training Agency: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.85%, Gemini Reason: Username "Newline Media and Training Agency" represents a company or organization name, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change. If edits are made with this username after the message, a UAA report should be filed.
• YOUTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.85%, Gemini Reason: Username 'YOUTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Waverley Christian College and Crossway houston problem: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.85%, Gemini Reason: Username contains names of organizations ('Waverley Christian College' and 'Crossway houston'), which is similar to company/group names and could be promotional or imply shared use. The addition of 'problem' is unusual and warrants further scrutiny if the user edits.
• Mr all i know it is you big zebra jerk: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.84%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the insult "zebra jerk", which is likely to offend other users and disrupt productive discussions. It is considered a disruptive and offensive username under Wikipedia policy.
• LittleBirdPoop69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.84%, Gemini Reason: The username "LittleBirdPoop69" contains the word "Poop", which, while not a strong profanity, can be considered mildly offensive or childish by some users. The number "69" could also be misinterpreted as sexually suggestive. While not a blatant violation requiring immediate block, it is advisable to inform the user about the username policy and suggest a change, and report to UAA if they edit.
• Issafufusussy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.83%, Gemini Reason: Username "Issafufusussy" contains the term "sussy" which is internet slang that can be interpreted as sexually suggestive and potentially offensive. The combination of terms creates a username that could be seen as disruptive or trolling, as it may provoke negative reactions from other editors. While not explicitly profane or a direct personal attack, it falls under usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption. A talk page message is warranted, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• 45thdurkarscoutsballs.comthisnamebetternotbeatthing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.82%, Gemini Reason: Username contains a domain name 'durkarscoutsballs.com', which is considered promotional as it resembles a website address. While 'balls' might be considered mildly offensive, the presence of '.com' makes it primarily a promotional username issue. A talk page message requesting a username change is appropriate, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Elite College of Business and Healthcare: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.82%, Gemini Reason: The username "Elite College of Business and Healthcare" represents the name of an organization, specifically an educational institution, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia's username policy. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if edits are made with this username.
• Black het hackr: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.82%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Black het hackr' could be interpreted as potentially offensive or disruptive. 'Black' is a racial descriptor and 'het' refers to heterosexual. Combined with 'hackr', it could be seen as a derogatory label or stereotype targeting heterosexual black individuals, which may violate the disruptive or offensive usernames policy. A talk page message is recommended to address this concern and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after this notification.
• AssDirWalterSkinner: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.82%, Gemini Reason: The username 'AssDirWalterSkinner' contains 'AssDir' which is likely intended to be a slightly disguised profanity ('Ass Director'). While 'WalterSkinner' is a reference to a fictional character and is not inherently problematic, the combination 'AssDir' could be considered disruptive and offensive as it includes a vulgar term. It falls under 'Usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions' within the 'Disruptive or offensive usernames' policy. A talk page message is appropriate, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• 3KMG Media Management: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.81%, Gemini Reason: Username '3KMG Media Management' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames.
• Indian Public Health Association: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.81%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Indian Public Health Association' unambiguously represents the name of an organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Dalitso Media Services: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.81%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Dalitso Media Services' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username.
• Career Marg pvt ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.80%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Career Marg pvt ltd' appears to be a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Requesting username change on talk page, UAA if edit.
• Tommy Z's Wedding DJs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.80%, Gemini Reason: Username "Tommy Z's Wedding DJs" is promotional as it represents a business name (wedding DJ service), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use (company/group names). A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy violation and request a username change. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report should be filed.
• MYG LTD Immigration: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.79%, Gemini Reason: Username "MYG LTD Immigration" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name (MYG LTD) and its service (Immigration), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report filed if the user edits without addressing the issue.
• Steamtech Innovative Machinery Pvt Ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.79%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Steamtech Innovative Machinery Pvt Ltd' unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Usernames representing companies or organizations are not permitted.
• Aviation Family Network: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.79%, Gemini Reason: The username "Aviation Family Network" may represent a company, organization, or group, which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change. If promotional edits are made, a UAA report should be filed.
• Dot BD Solutions Ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.78%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Dot BD Solutions Ltd' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Usernames should represent individual users, not companies or organizations.
• Shira Choir Office: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.78%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Shira Choir Office' appears to represent an organization or group, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Cemev Global Services Ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.78%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Cemev Global Services Ltd' unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• 2PMA - Marketing Agentur: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.77%, Gemini Reason: Username "2PMA - Marketing Agentur" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, specifically a "Marketing Agency" ("Marketing Agentur" in German). This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Rocktoiletstots: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.77%, Gemini Reason: The username "Rocktoiletstots" may be considered mildly disruptive due to the use of "toilet," which is associated with bodily waste, and "tots," which can mean young children. While not overtly offensive, the combination is unusual and potentially provocative, which could hinder a harmonious editing environment. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy, and a UAA report should be filed if disruptive edits are made.
• Saba marketing Agency: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.77%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Saba marketing Agency' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is recommended to leave a talk page message and file a UAA report if the user edits.
• NOAH is friggin awesomke yea yea: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.77%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'friggin', a euphemism for a profanity, which may be considered mildly offensive or disruptive. While borderline, it is recommended to inform the user and request a username change if they edit.
• Best real estate agents in buffalo Ny: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.76%, Gemini Reason: The username "Best real estate agents in buffalo Ny" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a type of business or service, specifically real estate agents in a specific location. This violates the policy against promotional usernames. Action 'uaa_if_edit' is chosen as per policy guidelines for promotional usernames, suggesting a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• Pakistan Logistics Cell: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.75%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Pakistan Logistics Cell' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after receiving the message.
• SpacemanMusicOfficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.75%, Gemini Reason: Username "SpacemanMusicOfficial" appears promotional as it suggests representation of a musical entity ("Spaceman Music") with the addition of "Official," implying it's the official account for this entity. This violates the policy against promotional usernames representing musical groups or bands.
• Smmpropertyservices: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.75%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Smmpropertyservices' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company or business related to property services, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Shane ojordanofficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.74%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Shane ojordanofficial' appears to be promotional. The term 'official' strongly suggests it is intended to represent an official account of a brand, organization, or public figure, which is against the policy on promotional usernames (Company/group names).
• BodhiMindCareHospital: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.74%, Gemini Reason: The username 'BodhiMindCareHospital' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a hospital, which is a commercial organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• European Jewish Association: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.73%, Gemini Reason: The username "European Jewish Association" unambiguously represents the name of an organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia username policy. Please change your username or it will be reported to UAA if edits are made.
• BernardSandersliar: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.73%, Gemini Reason: The username "BernardSandersliar" is disparaging and potentially offensive as it calls a well-known political figure a "liar". This violates the policy against disruptive usernames by being likely to offend and cause disruption, and by containing a disparaging statement about a notable person. It also falls under usernames with contentious or disparaging statements about another person. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• Garner & Hancock Solicitors: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.73%, Gemini Reason: The username "Garner & Hancock Solicitors" is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a company (solicitors firm). This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after being notified.
• Legal Aid Center: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.71%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Legal Aid Center' is likely promotional and implies shared use, as it represents an organization name, violating the username policy against company/organization names. Request username change and file UAA if edits continue after notification.
• Shina Media Studio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.71%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Shina Media Studio' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization ('Media Studio'), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Ormusy Entertainment Co: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.71%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ormusy Entertainment Co' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the username policy. Please change your username to comply with the policy.
• Damir Squad Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.70%, Gemini Reason: Username "Damir Squad Official" implies shared use and may be promotional as it sounds like a group or organization name, violating username policy sections on shared use and promotional usernames. Request username change on talk page and file UAA if edits occur.
• Nordstar Solutions LLC: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.70%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Nordstar Solutions LLC' is a company name, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia's username policy. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if edits are made.
• Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.70%, Gemini Reason: Username represents the name of an organization, 'Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich' (Administrative Court of the Canton of Zurich), which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Usernames should represent individual users, not organizations.
• Fetus Tenders: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.70%, Gemini Reason: The username "Fetus Tenders" is potentially offensive and disruptive. While not explicitly profane, the juxtaposition of "fetus" with "tenders" can be seen as insensitive, distasteful, and potentially intended to provoke negative reactions or offend other editors. This falls under 'Disruptive or offensive usernames' as it may 'offend other contributors or cause disruption'. A talk page message should be left to request a username change. If the user edits after notification, a UAA report may be warranted.
• Dayeslawfirm: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.70%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Dayeslawfirm' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization (a law firm), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is advisable to leave a talk page message and file a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• FlyingSparkManagement: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.69%, Gemini Reason: Username 'FlyingSparkManagement' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Easirent Property Ventures: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.69%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Easirent Property Ventures' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or business name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username or it will be blocked.
• Farineaux Travel Pvt. Ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.68%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Farineaux Travel Pvt. Ltd' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• Michael Klinger Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.68%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Michael Klinger Official' may be misleading or promotional. The term 'Official' suggests it is the official account of Michael Klinger, which could be problematic if it's not and/or if Michael Klinger is a brand, public figure, or organization. Please clarify if this is your official account and if you are representing a brand or organization. If you are, this username may violate the username policy. If you continue to edit with this username without clarification, a report to Username for Administrator Attention (UAA) may be necessary.
• Terrafirma.solutions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.68%, Gemini Reason: Username "Terrafirma.solutions" is promotional as it resembles a company or organization name and a domain name, violating the policy against promotional usernames. Please leave a talk page message and file a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Faizancctvservices: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Faizancctvservices' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company name offering CCTV services. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• 247digitalmarketing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: The username '247digitalmarketing' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization related to digital marketing services, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• MADD Marketing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: Username 'MADD Marketing' is promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization related to marketing, violating the policy against promotional usernames. It also implies shared use. Please change your username.
• Digital Tax e Services: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: The username "Digital Tax e Services" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or service name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy violation and request a username change. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report should be filed.
• West Virginia Siren Productions1: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.65%, Gemini Reason: The username 'West Virginia Siren Productions1' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left to inform the user and request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Business Minds Media: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.65%, Gemini Reason: Username "Business Minds Media" appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, which is not permitted as per username policy.
• Danish Board of District Heating (DBDH): DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.65%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Danish Board of District Heating (DBDH)' unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Maricopalibrarydistrict: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.65%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Maricopalibrarydistrict' is promotional as it represents the name of an organization, the Maricopa Library District. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• Targonix agency: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.64%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Targonix agency' is promotional as it represents a company or organization, which is not permitted per username policy (Usernames that unambiguously represent the name of a company, organization...). Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Au Revoir Wellness Resort: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.64%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Au Revoir Wellness Resort' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a business name, specifically a wellness resort, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Jordan Economic Forum JEF: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.63%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Jordan Economic Forum JEF' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, 'Jordan Economic Forum', violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is advised to change the username.
• Kampala youth news: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.62%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Kampala youth news' is promotional as it unambiguously represents an organization or news outlet, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person.
• Integral Group Global: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.62%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Integral Group Global' appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a company or organization, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Mentalillnessesbreakcouldgetcanceral: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Mentalillnessesbreakcouldgetcanceral' could be seen as insensitive and potentially disruptive due to mentioning serious health conditions in a potentially negative or dismissive way. While not explicitly violating the disruptive or offensive usernames policy, it has the potential to cause negative emotional reactions and make harmonious editing difficult. A talk page message should be left to ask the user to consider changing their username, and a UAA report should be filed if they edit with this username.
• Tanzschule MOVE!iT GmbH: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.62%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Tanzschule MOVE!iT GmbH' is promotional as it represents a company name ('Tanzschule' means dance school in German, and 'MOVE!iT GmbH' is likely the company name, with 'GmbH' being a German company legal form). This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• Vilnius International School: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.60%, Gemini Reason: Username "Vilnius International School" is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please request a username change on their talk page and file a UAA report if they edit after notification.
• Riverty Group: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.60%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Riverty Group' represents the name of a company or organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• Fastmarketing.in: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.59%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Fastmarketing.in' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or service name ('Fast marketing') and includes a domain extension ('.in'). This violates the policy against promotional usernames.
• HACKED AND BUSTED FOR MAINTENANCE IS BACK!: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.59%, Gemini Reason: Username implies past disruptive activity ("HACKED AND BUSTED") and is attention-seeking/provocative. While not overtly offensive, it could be seen as disruptive and hinder harmonious editing. Please consider choosing a more appropriate username. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report may be filed.
• Vedam School of Technology: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.59%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Vedam School of Technology' represents a school, which is an organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please request a username change.
• M Gill Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.58%, Gemini Reason: The username 'M Gill Official' is potentially misleading and promotional. 'Official' may imply an official status within Wikipedia or represent a brand, organization, or group, violating policies against misleading and promotional usernames, as well as usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to address these concerns and request a username change. If the user edits after this message, a UAA report should be filed.
• Ajinshibuofficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.57%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ajinshibuofficial' appears promotional and misleading, suggesting a company or organization account due to the term 'official'. This violates username policy regarding promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person and does not suggest company affiliation. If edits are made with this username without addressing this, a UAA report will be filed.
• Axo.official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.57%, Gemini Reason: Username "Axo.official" appears promotional and implies shared use, suggesting it represents an official account for a company, organization, or brand named "Axo". The ".official" suffix is indicative of a non-personal, organizational account, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A username should represent an individual, not a company or organization. Recommend informing the user about the username policy violation and advising them to choose a username that represents an individual editor.
• Suncitykitchenand homes: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.57%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Suncitykitchenand homes' appears to be promotional as it could represent a business name, specifically a kitchen and home related business in 'Suncity'. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change if it is indeed a business name. If the user edits after this notification without addressing the username issue, a UAA report may be necessary.
• Salzburgglobalcomms: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.56%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Salzburgglobalcomms' appears to be promotional, representing a company or organization name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Gollamudi technology and services: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.56%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Gollamudi technology and services' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization offering technology and services, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Donaldtrump47: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.56%, Gemini Reason: Username implies impersonation of a famous person (Donald Trump), violating the misleading usernames policy regarding impersonation. While not overtly offensive, it is potentially disruptive due to referencing a contentious political figure. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits after notification.
• Mangolia677 and Durmies can go sick a duck: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.56%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Mangolia677 and Durmies can go sick a duck' contains the unusual and potentially disruptive phrase 'Durmies can go sick a duck'. While not overtly offensive, it is nonsensical and raises concerns about the user's intent and potential for disruption. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• Ocfmediadept: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.56%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ocfmediadept' may violate the username policy as it appears to represent an organization or group's media department, which is considered promotional. Please review Wikipedia's username policy and consider changing your username. If you continue editing with this username, a report to Username for Administrator Attention (UAA) may be filed.
• Dariush Soudi Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.55%, Gemini Reason: The username "Dariush Soudi Official" appears promotional. It uses a personal name followed by "Official", which suggests it represents a public figure, brand, or organization, potentially violating the policy against promotional usernames. It could also be seen as misleading by implying official status or impersonation. Recommend a talk page message and UAA report if edits are made before username change.
• Southgeorgiaheritagetrust: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.54%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Southgeorgiaheritagetrust' appears to be promotional as it directly represents the name of an organization, the South Georgia Heritage Trust. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Ormiston Kensington Queensmill Academy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.54%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a school, which is considered a promotional username (organization name) and implies shared use, violating username policy. Recommend talk page message and UAA if edits are made.
• Jeek lover 69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.53%, Gemini Reason: Username "Jeek lover 69" is potentially offensive and disruptive. "Lover" combined with "69" (a known sexual innuendo) is likely to be seen as sexually suggestive and may offend other editors, hindering productive discussions. It is recommended to change the username to something more appropriate.
• Arifpay Fintech: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.53%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Arifpay Fintech' unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It should be changed to comply with username guidelines.
• CDC IATROGENIC HARMS: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.53%, Gemini Reason: The username "CDC IATROGENIC HARMS" is potentially disruptive and offensive. It makes a contentious and disparaging statement about a well-known health organization (CDC), implying they cause harm through medical treatment. This could hinder harmonious editing, especially in health-related topics. While not overtly profane or a personal attack, it violates the spirit of usernames that should not be disruptive or offensive, and can be seen as disparaging towards a significant institution.
• Los Angeles Cash Home Buyers: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.52%, Gemini Reason: Username "Los Angeles Cash Home Buyers" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a business name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. This falls under the 'Promotional usernames' section of the inappropriate usernames policy.
• VisoraOfficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.52%, Gemini Reason: Username 'VisoraOfficial' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests representing a company, organization, product, or brand named 'Visora'. The term 'Official' further reinforces this interpretation, implying it is the official account of 'Visora'. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• YashmayWorldSchool: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.52%, Gemini Reason: Username 'YashmayWorldSchool' represents a school name, which is considered promotional as it unambiguously represents an organization. This also implies shared use, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Ryanfartingname100001111: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.51%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the word 'farting', which while not strictly profane, is childish, mildly vulgar, and may be considered disruptive or offensive to some users, potentially hindering a harmonious editing environment. Please choose a more appropriate username.
• Oneworld-alliance Logistics: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.51%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Oneworld-alliance Logistics' unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to request a username change and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Theofficialmiamivice: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.50%, Gemini Reason: Username "Theofficialmiamivice" is promotional as it represents a brand/product (Miami Vice) and implies official representation. It also suggests shared use by representing an entity rather than an individual. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if edits are made after notification.
• Deutsche Welle Alternative fur Deutschland: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.49%, Gemini Reason: The username combines "Deutsche Welle" (a broadcaster) and "Alternative fur Deutschland" (AfD, a controversial political party). This is politically charged and potentially disruptive due to the controversial nature of AfD. It could be perceived as promotional or implying affiliation, and may offend users due to its political implications. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after this message.
• Jaipurgoldenhospital: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.49%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Jaipurgoldenhospital' is promotional as it represents the name of a hospital, which is an organization. This also implies shared use, violating username policy regarding promotional and shared usernames. Request username change and report to UAA if edits are made.
• Essentialsswetpants: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.49%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Essentialsswetpants' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a brand or product name related to clothing. While not explicitly violating the policy at first glance, it is borderline promotional and warrants a talk page message to inquire about the user's intent and ensure it's not a promotional account. If promotional editing occurs, a UAA report may be necessary.
• SnailNetworkTeam: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.49%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SnailNetworkTeam' contains 'Team' which may imply shared use or be promotional. 'SnailNetwork' is ambiguous and could represent a company or organization. Recommend talk page message to clarify if it is a personal account and to review username policy regarding promotional usernames and shared use. UAA if promotional editing is observed or if the user confirms it represents a company/group.
• Mediacorp Curia: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.47%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Mediacorp Curia' is promotional as 'Mediacorp' is a company name. While 'Curia' is not a company, the combination strongly suggests a company or organizational context, implying shared use and potentially promotional intent. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left explaining the policy and requesting a username change. If the user edits after the message, a UAA report should be filed.
• CloudMinister Technologies 1: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.45%, Gemini Reason: Username 'CloudMinister Technologies 1' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Athulya Senior Care: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.44%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Athulya Senior Care' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, specifically a senior care service. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits without changing the username.
• Texcoms Worldwide: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.44%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Texcoms Worldwide' is promotional as it represents a company name, which is against username policy. Usernames should represent individual people, not organizations.
• Service culturel Ambassade de France en Corée: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.44%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Service culturel Ambassade de France en Corée' is promotional as it unambiguously represents an organization (cultural service of the French Embassy in Korea). This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after receiving the message.
• Federación de Estudiantes de Derecho de Venezuela: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.43%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Federación de Estudiantes de Derecho de Venezuela' represents the name of an organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating the username policy. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report will be filed.
• NOBLEGHQGROUP: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.42%, Gemini Reason: Username 'NOBLEGHQGROUP' appears to be a company or organization name, indicated by 'GROUP' and 'GHQ', violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person.
• Telnet.agency: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.41%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Telnet.agency' appears promotional, resembling a company or organization name due to the '.agency' TLD. Violates policy against promotional usernames. Please change username.
• ACRConsultancy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.41%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ACRConsultancy' unambiguously represents a company or organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia's username policy. This falls under the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Action: uaa_if_edit.
• Akal Central Library: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.40%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Akal Central Library' unambiguously represents an organization (library), which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• Butried League Association: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.40%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Butried League Association' sounds like it could represent a company, organization, or group, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is ambiguous, so a talk page message should be left to inquire about the nature of the username and request a change if it is indeed promotional. A UAA report should be filed if the user edits after being notified.
• Uiuxdesigncourse: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.39%, Gemini Reason: Username is promotional as it represents a course name, which falls under the category of organized event/product and may violate the promotional usernames policy. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• Yourmum7456: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.39%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Yourmum7456' could be interpreted as mildly disruptive or trolling due to the 'Yourmum' phrasing, which is often used in internet jokes and can be perceived as mildly offensive. While not explicitly violating severe categories, it has potential to be disruptive. A talk page message is recommended, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification to assess their editing behavior.
• Trump bololo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.39%, Gemini Reason: The username contains 'Trump', referencing a contentious political figure, which could be seen as disruptive or provocative. While not overtly offensive or a direct attack, it has the potential to cause disruption. A talk page message is recommended to advise the user about the potential issues with the username. Further action may be needed if disruptive editing occurs.
• PegasiOfficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.39%, Gemini Reason: The username 'PegasiOfficial' appears to be promotional, potentially representing a company, organization, or group. The term 'Official' strongly suggests this. Usernames representing companies or groups are not permitted. A talk page message should be left informing the user about the username policy and requesting a change. If the user edits after this notice, a UAA report should be filed.
• Skibitytoiletrizzlerwhy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.38%, Gemini Reason: The username "Skibitytoiletrizzlerwhy" is unusual and may be considered disruptive due to its nonsensical nature and association with an internet meme. While not overtly offensive, libelous, misleading, or promotional, it could be perceived as unprofessional or attention-seeking. A talk page message should be left to address the potential disruptiveness and request a username change. A UAA report will be considered if the user edits after this notification.
• Gigtelmarketing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.38%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Gigtelmarketing' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company or marketing service, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits.
• D.R.S edm drop mixx official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.38%, Gemini Reason: Username appears promotional as "D.R.S edm drop mixx official" strongly suggests a musical group or brand name, violating the promotional username policy and potentially implying shared use. The term "official" reinforces the promotional nature.
• Ayglo Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.37%, Gemini Reason: The username "Ayglo Official" appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests the name of a company, organization, or group. It also implies shared use, which is against policy. While not immediately disruptive or offensive, it violates the promotional username policy. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits.
• ABN FAMILY: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.35%, Gemini Reason: The username 'ABN FAMILY' could be interpreted as a promotional username (representing a company or organization 'ABN FAMILY') or a username implying shared use (representing a family group), which are against username policies. It is ambiguous and not immediately disruptive or offensive. A talk page message is appropriate to inquire about the username and their intentions. UAA report should be filed if the user edits after this message without addressing the username concern, especially if their edits are promotional or indicative of shared use.
• Watleygroup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.34%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Watleygroup' appears to represent a company or group, indicated by the term 'group'. This is against the policy prohibiting usernames that unambiguously represent company, organization, or group names (Promotional usernames and Usernames implying shared use). Please change your username or clarify if it represents an individual.
• Izoom Performance & Inovação: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.33%, Gemini Reason: The username "Izoom Performance & Inovação" appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Ecomedianews: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.32%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ecomedianews' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company, organization, or news outlet name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames. Please change your username to comply with policy.
• SilverDaze Official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.32%, Gemini Reason: The username 'SilverDaze Official' is promotional as it includes 'Official' which suggests it represents a brand, company, or organization rather than an individual user. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• DesignSteinStudios: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.31%, Gemini Reason: Username 'DesignSteinStudios' appears to be promotional as it represents a company or creative studio name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to comply with Wikipedia's username policy. If edits are made with this username after this notification, a report to Usernames for Administrator Attention (UAA) may be filed.
• DoGo Agency: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.31%, Gemini Reason: Username 'DoGo Agency' is likely promotional as it represents a company or organization, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual, not a group or company. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report will be filed.
• Allsys Solutions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.29%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Allsys Solutions' unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. This falls under the category of promotional usernames and warrants a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• Bs-global-media: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.29%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Bs-global-media' appears to be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, potentially violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message to the user explaining the policy and requesting a username change. If the user edits after receiving the message, a UAA report should be filed.
• Fintechglobalfx: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.28%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Fintechglobalfx' appears to be promotional as it likely represents a company or organization related to financial technology and global foreign exchange, violating the policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• LoptafOfficial: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.28%, Gemini Reason: Username 'LoptafOfficial' sounds potentially promotional or indicative of shared use due to the 'Official' suffix, suggesting a brand, organization, or group. It is borderline and not overtly offensive, but warrants a talk page message to inform the user about the username policy, especially regarding promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. File UAA report if user edits without addressing the username concern.
• Statehela agencies: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.27%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Statehela agencies' is potentially promotional as it could represent a company or organization name. 'agencies' implies an organizational entity, and 'Statehela' could be the name of that entity. While not definitively promotional, it warrants a talk page message to inform the user about the username policy, particularly regarding promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report should be filed for further review.
• Gavin Prins Media: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.27%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Gavin Prins Media' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or brand name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person rather than a company or organization. If edits are made with this username after this notice, a UAA report may be filed.
• Slimbastard: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.27%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the potentially offensive term 'bastard', which could be seen as mildly disruptive or offensive to some users. While not overtly profane, it may hinder harmonious editing. Recommend talk page message and UAA if user edits.
• Abbeyspringsrentals: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.21%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Abbeyspringsrentals' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a business or organization name, likely related to rental services. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
• Infocast Systems: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.21%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Infocast Systems' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Gemechis Tegegnee official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.21%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Gemechis Tegegnee official' is potentially misleading and could imply official affiliation, authority, or shared use, which violates username policy. The term 'official' is ambiguous and problematic. A talk page message requesting a username change is appropriate. File UAA if the user edits after notification without changing their username.
• Official alivera: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.20%, Gemini Reason: Username "Official alivera" violates the username policy as it is misleading by implying official status or affiliation, and promotional by suggesting it represents a brand or company "alivera". It also implies shared use which is not permitted. Please choose a username that does not violate these policies.
• Speeki.Marketing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.20%, Gemini Reason: Promotional username. The username "Speeki.Marketing" appears to represent a company or marketing service, which is not permitted as it is considered promotional and implies shared use. Please choose a username that represents you as an individual person.
• The Modern School, Delhi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.17%, Gemini Reason: The username "The Modern School, Delhi" violates the username policy as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization (a school), which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use. This falls under the category of usernames that are not permitted. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if promotional editing occurs.
• Shamspam1924: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.14%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Shamspam' strongly implies promotional intent and potential disruptive behavior (spam), violating the policy against disruptive and promotional usernames. A talk page message is advised, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits.
• Modioncommunications: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Modioncommunications' appears to be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• SASglobalcorp1750: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SASglobalcorp1750' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Awaiting edits to file UAA.
• ExplorersClubHQ: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.11%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a company or organization (Explorers Club Headquarters), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Kigezi HomeBoyz Football Club: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.11%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a company, organization, or group (football club), which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. Please change your username to comply with Wikipedia's guidelines.
• GowbellFoundation: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.10%, Gemini Reason: Username 'GowbellFoundation' is promotional and implies shared use as it represents a foundation, which is an organization, violating the username policy against company/organization names. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person.
• Aditum Publishing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.09%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Aditum Publishing' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the username policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message requesting a username change should be left, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after notification.
• Rjmetgroup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.08%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Rjmetgroup' could be interpreted as representing a company or group name, which is against the policy regarding promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is not unambiguously promotional, but warrants a talk page message to inquire about the username's intent. If the user engages in promotional editing or confirms it is a group account, a UAA report should be filed.
• Ingabire Foundation: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.06%, Gemini Reason: Username "Ingabire Foundation" represents an organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia username policy. Usernames representing organizations are not permitted as they are considered promotional and imply shared account usage.
• The Arts Foundation Te Tumu Toi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.06%, Gemini Reason: The username "The Arts Foundation Te Tumu Toi" is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• FCxingyungroup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.05%, Gemini Reason: Username "FCxingyungroup" appears to be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username or clarify if it represents your personal name. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report may be filed.
• SPAZIO CASA SRL: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.04%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SPAZIO CASA SRL' appears to be a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. 'SRL' is a common abbreviation for 'Società a responsabilità limitata' (Limited Liability Company). Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Doanderspublishing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.04%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Doanderspublishing' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name related to publishing. Usernames that unambiguously represent companies or organizations are not permitted as per the promotional usernames policy.
• SexuallyAttractedToPans: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.03%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SexuallyAttractedToPans' is sexually suggestive and could be considered offensive or disruptive. While 'pans' can have multiple meanings, the combination with 'SexuallyAttractedTo' creates a username that has the potential to cause offense and disrupt productive discussions. This violates the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames. A UAA report will be filed if edits are made with this username after notification.
• KSY-official: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.03%, Gemini Reason: The username 'KSY-official' appears promotional and implies shared use, as 'KSY' could represent an organization and 'official' suggests an official account for that entity. This violates the policy against usernames that unambiguously represent companies or groups. A talk page message requesting a username change is recommended, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after being notified.
• Camera Museum London: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.03%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a company/organization (Camera Museum London), which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Action: UAA if edit.
• Smarttouchskinsolutions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.02%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Smarttouchskinsolutions' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or brand name, which violates the username policy. Please choose a username that represents an individual person, not a company or product.
• Trustedinsuranceproviders: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.01%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Trustedinsuranceproviders' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization providing insurance services, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It suggests a business name rather than an individual user.
• Wisconsinchamberorchestra: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.01%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Wisconsinchamberorchestra' represents a musical organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy.
• Positon PR: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.00%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Positon PR' resembles a job title (Position in Public Relations), which is discouraged as it implies shared use and could be seen as promotional. It falls under 'Usernames implying shared use' and potentially 'Promotional usernames'. Monitor for edits and file UAA if edits are problematic.
• ADTIndustries: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.00%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ADTIndustries' unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after notification.
• Eatmyshortsson: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.99%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Eatmyshortsson' is potentially disruptive. While not overtly profane, it may be seen as childish, provocative, or trolling, violating the policy against usernames that are likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption. Advise user to change username. UAA if edits made with this username.
• RGVGROUP: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.98%, Gemini Reason: Username 'RGVGROUP' appears to represent a group or organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating Wikipedia username policy. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Leonis Adobe Museum: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.95%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Leonis Adobe Museum' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a museum, which is an organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits.
• Cactus Island Nursery: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.93%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a company or organization name (Nursery), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Action: UAA if user edits after notification.
• Ttrichome Technologies: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.90%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ttrichome Technologies' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please advise the user to choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Carrotmotionstudios11: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.90%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Carrotmotionstudios11' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, which is against username policy. Usernames that unambiguously represent company, organization, website, product, musical group or band, team, club, creative group, or organized event are not permitted.
• SKY HAWKS SEO: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.89%, Gemini Reason: The username "SKY HAWKS SEO" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, likely related to Search Engine Optimization services. This also implies shared use, which is against policy.
• Shrinatn brijfolk group: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.88%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Shrinatn brijfolk group' appears to represent a group or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Usernames should represent individual users, not groups or organizations. Please advise the user to choose a username that represents an individual and does not promote a group.
• Cctvmarketpakistan: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.87%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Cctvmarketpakistan' is promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name related to the CCTV market in Pakistan. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits.
• Social Networking Service: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.85%, Gemini Reason: Username "Social Networking Service" could be interpreted as representing a company or organization, which violates the promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use policies. It is ambiguous and potentially promotional. Recommend talk page message and UAA if user edits to monitor for promotional activity.
• Holasoantiipedialolotpespoof: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.82%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'peedial' which is phonetically similar to 'pedophile' and could be misinterpreted as offensive. Requesting username clarification and change on talk page. UAA if edits occur.
• TUSHAR MLA MULLA COLONY: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.82%, Gemini Reason: The username 'TUSHAR MLA MULLA COLONY' uses a political title ('MLA') combined with a potential location or community name ('MULLA COLONY'). This could be interpreted as representing a position within a group, implying shared use, or being subtly promotional or misleading by associating a political title with a specific community. While not overtly offensive, it warrants a talk page message to inform the user about username policies, especially regarding misleading and shared use usernames. If the user edits after this message without addressing the username, a UAA report should be considered.
• Birla Evara Specifications: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.81%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Birla Evara Specifications' appears to be promotional as it likely represents a product or brand name, violating the policy against promotional usernames. Please choose a username that is not promotional. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report will be filed.
• Navijin Technology: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.78%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Navijin Technology' appears to be a company or organization name, which is considered a promotional username and violates Wikipedia's username policy.
• Denisaronacuck2: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.76%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Denisaronacuck2' contains the potentially offensive term 'cuck', which may be considered disruptive or offensive to other editors, violating the policy against disruptive or offensive usernames. Please request a username change and report to UAA if the user edits after notification.
• 宇宙集团百科编辑员: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.74%, Gemini Reason: The username '宇宙集团百科编辑员' (Universe Group Encyclopedia Editor) is promotional and implies shared use as it represents a company or organization name ('宇宙集团' - Universe Group). Usernames unambiguously representing company or organization names are not permitted. Please choose a username that represents an individual person, not a group or company.
• D c l x v I clan inc: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.68%, Gemini Reason: Username 'D c l x v I clan inc' is potentially problematic as 'clan inc' could be interpreted as a company or organization name, which might be promotional or imply shared use. The prefix 'D c l x v I' makes it ambiguous but warrants a talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• Samtrump2025: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.64%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Samtrump2025' references a highly contentious political figure, Donald Trump. While not explicitly offensive or profane, it has the potential to be disruptive and provoke negative reactions from other editors due to the strong political opinions associated with this figure. This falls under usernames that are 'likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions'. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about this potential issue and request a username change, with a UAA report if editing continues after notification.
• JAMM CO MASONRY: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.62%, Gemini Reason: Username 'JAMM CO MASONRY' appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user, and a UAA report should be filed if they edit after being notified.
• 0987654321Xbot: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.62%, Gemini Reason: The username '0987654321Xbot' could be misleading as it ends with 'bot,' potentially implying it is a bot account when it is not declared as such, violating the policy on misleading usernames. It is recommended to leave a talk page message requesting a username change. If the user edits after this message without addressing the username, a UAA report may be considered.
• Chartered Consultant International: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.60%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Chartered Consultant International' appears to represent a company or organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Please choose a username that represents an individual person instead of a company or organization.
• Skibitytoiletrizzler: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.59%, Gemini Reason: The username "Skibitytoiletrizzler" uses internet slang and may be considered unserious or unprofessional, potentially disruptive to a collaborative environment. While not explicitly violating policy, it is advisable to request a username change. Report to UAA if the user edits after notification.
• The Concord School: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.57%, Gemini Reason: The username "The Concord School" is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a school, which is an organization. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy violation and request a username change. If the user edits after being notified, a UAA report should be filed.
• TheGenesisGroup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.57%, Gemini Reason: Username 'TheGenesisGroup' is promotional and implies shared use as it represents a group or organization name, violating the username policy against company/group names and shared accounts. Requesting username change and filing UAA if edits are made after notification.
• Angelsvalleyschool: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.57%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Angelsvalleyschool' appears to be promotional as it likely represents a school name, 'Angels Valley School'. This violates the policy against usernames that unambiguously represent organizations and implies shared use. Action: talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• SBSLegal: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.55%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SBSLegal' appears to represent a company or organization name related to legal services, which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• ExxonMobil US: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.53%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ExxonMobil US' unambiguously represents the name of a company, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating the username policy.
• Jokerproductionspittsburgh: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.52%, Gemini Reason: Username "Jokerproductionspittsburgh" resembles a company or organization name, specifically a production company located in Pittsburgh. This may violate the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits without addressing the username concern.
• Cadet Military Lyceum: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.52%, Gemini Reason: Username "Cadet Military Lyceum" appears to represent the name of an organization (likely a school), which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Please change your username or clarify if it represents an individual and not an organization. UAA report will be filed if edits continue with this username.
• Royallprealestate: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.51%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Royallprealestate' is promotional as it appears to represent a real estate business name, violating the policy against usernames that unambiguously represent company or organization names. This is a potentially promotional username and should be addressed if the user edits.
• Affe2011ÄR EN DRÄNG OCH GÖKARNA ÄR EFTER DIG: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.51%, Gemini Reason: Username contains potentially offensive terms in Swedish and German ('Affe' - monkey, 'DRÄNG' - farmhand/servant in a derogatory sense, 'GÖKARNA ÄR EFTER DIG' - the cuckoos are after you, which can be interpreted negatively). While not overtly profane or explicitly violating, the combination creates a negative and potentially disruptive username that could offend other users. It is borderline, but warrants a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• AMBZ TECH UG: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.48%, Gemini Reason: Username appears to represent a company or organization name (likely 'AMBZ Tech UG'), which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. Usernames that unambiguously represent company names are not permitted.
• Thisguystinks: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.47%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Thisguystinks' is potentially disruptive as it can be interpreted as impolite, disparaging, or expressing negative sentiment towards other editors ('this guy'). While not overtly offensive or a severe violation, it is borderline inappropriate and could hinder a harmonious editing environment. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if edits are made with this username after notification.
• OfficialLuciferMorningstar: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.46%, Gemini Reason: The username 'OfficialLuciferMorningstar' may be seen as disruptive or offensive due to its religious connotations and the 'Official' prefix, potentially implying trolling or attention-seeking behavior. Please consider choosing a different username. If disruptive editing occurs, a UAA report may be filed.
• VENSHA BAND: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.46%, Gemini Reason: The username 'VENSHA BAND' appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents a musical band, which is against the username policy. Usernames that represent musical groups or bands are considered promotional and are not permitted.
• Coinzonemedia: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.46%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Coinzonemedia' is promotional as it appears to represent a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Official Onion: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.39%, Gemini Reason: The username "Official Onion" may be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, potentially related to satire or news. It is ambiguous and requires clarification from the user. Recommend talk page message and UAA if edits are made.
• Khaya Art and design: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.37%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Khaya Art and design' may be promotional as it could represent a business or organization related to art and design. It also implies shared use by representing a group rather than an individual. Please review Wikipedia's username policy and consider choosing a username that represents an individual person and is not promotional. If edits are made with this username, a report may be filed at UAA.
• Kaveri University: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.36%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Kaveri University' represents the name of an organization (university), which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Requesting username change via talk page message.
• RAPSStaff: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.36%, Gemini Reason: The username 'RAPSStaff' is likely promotional or implies shared use, as 'Staff' suggests an organizational account. 'RAPS' could be an organization name. This violates the policy against usernames representing organizations and implying shared use (Promotional usernames, Usernames implying shared use). It is not severely disruptive or offensive, so a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits is the appropriate action.
• TheOfficialRonnie: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.36%, Gemini Reason: The username "TheOfficialRonnie" could be seen as misleading by implying an official status or impersonating a known person named Ronnie. The term "Official" suggests authority or a brand, which is generally discouraged for personal usernames. A talk page message should be left to request a username change.
• Interzero Holding: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.32%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Interzero Holding' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to comply with policy. UAA report will be filed if edits are made with this username.
• KME Technology: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.31%, Gemini Reason: Username 'KME Technology' is promotional as it represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person.
• Brimen PPA Megamendung: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.30%, Gemini Reason: Username "Brimen PPA Megamendung" closely resembles the name of an organization "PPA Megamendung" (Pusat Pelatihan Pertanian dan Perdesaan Swadaya Megamendung), which is an agricultural training center in Indonesia. This is borderline promotional as it might represent an organization. A talk page message should be left to inquire about username and potential conflict of interest. UAA report if edits are promotional or COI related after notification.
• AT organization: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.29%, Gemini Reason: Username 'AT organization' represents an organization, violating the policy against usernames that unambiguously represent the name of a company, organization, website, product, musical group or band, team, club, creative group, or organized event. This falls under promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use policies.
• KSM Foundation: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.28%, Gemini Reason: Username 'KSM Foundation' violates the username policy as it unambiguously represents a company or organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use. It falls under the policy against usernames representing organizations and may be seen as promotional. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Skbditoiletsmelly: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.27%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Skbditoiletsmelly' is potentially disruptive and offensive due to its association with toilet humor and disgusting imagery. It could be interpreted as trolling or unserious, which may hinder a harmonious editing environment. While not blatantly profane, it may violate the policy against usernames that are likely to offend or cause disruption. A talk page message should be left to request a username change and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• UScongresscomplaince: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.25%, Gemini Reason: The username 'UScongresscomplaince' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use by referencing 'US Congress' and 'compliance', potentially suggesting an organization or group related to these topics. While not a blatant violation, it is borderline. A talk page message is recommended to clarify username policy and request username change if it represents an organization. File UAA if edits are made after this message and indicate promotional or problematic intent.
• Eradan isaacososexual: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.22%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Eradan isaacososexual' is sexually suggestive and likely to be considered offensive or disruptive. It violates the policy against usernames that are sexually explicit or likely to cause disruption to productive processes. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Skibiditoilet69420rizz: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.19%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Skibiditoilet69420rizz' is unserious and potentially disruptive due to its juvenile and meme-like nature, including elements that may be considered slightly offensive (references to '69' and '420'). While not blatantly violating policy, it may hinder productive collaboration. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after notification.
• Manash agritourism: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.18%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Manash agritourism' appears promotional as it could represent a business or organization name related to agritourism. It falls under the category of usernames that unambiguously represent a company, organization, or website, which is against the username policy. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change if it is indeed a business or promotional name. UAA report should be filed if promotional editing occurs.
• Goonboy6969: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.15%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Goonboy6969' contains the term 'goon' which can be considered offensive or derogatory. While not explicitly profane, it has the potential to be disruptive or offensive to other users. It warrants a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• Ru marketing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.14%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ru marketing' is promotional, suggesting a company or marketing service related to 'marketing'. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames. Please change your username or clarify if it represents your personal name and not a business. If edits are made with this username, a UAA report will be filed.
• Cátedra Industrias y Procesos Agroalimentarios: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.13%, Gemini Reason: Username "Cátedra Industrias y Procesos Agroalimentarios" appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization (academic department or chair). This violates the policy against usernames representing organizations and implies shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• LiturgicalConference: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.06%, Gemini Reason: The username "LiturgicalConference" could be interpreted as a promotional username representing an organization or event, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is not clearly offensive or disruptive enough for immediate UAA, but warrants a talk page message and UAA report if promotional editing occurs.
• Tpi media: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.05%, Gemini Reason: Username "Tpi media" appears to be promotional, potentially representing a company or organization name, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please leave a talk page message to request a username change and file a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Westbrookhayschool: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.05%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Westbrookhayschool' appears to be promotional as it represents the name of a school, which is an organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to comply with Wikipedia's username policy.
• ALD Property: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.05%, Gemini Reason: The username "ALD Property" may represent a company or organization, which is considered promotional and implies shared use, violating username policy. Recommend talk page message and UAA if edits are made.
• Afghan United FC: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.05%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Afghan United FC' is promotional as it represents a football club name, which falls under the category of company/organization/team names and is generally not permitted. This also implies shared use, as it likely represents a group rather than an individual. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if promotional edits are made or if the user continues to use the username after being notified.
• Lhlcbseschool: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.04%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Lhlcbseschool' strongly resembles a school name, which can be interpreted as promotional. It may also imply shared use if it represents an organization. While not overtly offensive, it falls under potentially problematic usernames. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the username's intent and advise on policy. If the user edits and their contributions are promotional or related to a specific school, a UAA report should be filed.
• Communication IEFC: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.04%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Communication IEFC' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a company or organization. While not definitively violating the policy, it warrants a talk page message to inquire about the username's intent and advise on username policy. UAA report to be filed if promotional editing occurs.
• Drelifehater: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.02%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Drelifehater' expresses hatred, which can be seen as offensive and disruptive. It falls under 'Disruptive or offensive usernames' as it's likely to offend other contributors or cause disruption to productive processes. Recommend talk page message and UAA if edits are made.
• Evtechmedia: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.02%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Evtechmedia' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company or organization name related to 'Evtech' and 'media'. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits after notification.
• Safetec GmbH: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.01%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Safetec GmbH' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after notification.
• Kungfukennypoo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.00%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'poo', a mild profanity, potentially offensive under disruptive usernames policy. Not severely offensive, but borderline inappropriate. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• BarmetMedia: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.97%, Gemini Reason: Username 'BarmetMedia' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please review Wikipedia's username policy and choose a username that represents an individual person.
• BBWikiTeam: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.97%, Gemini Reason: Username 'BBWikiTeam' appears promotional and implies shared use, suggesting a team or organization name rather than an individual. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use (company/group names).
• 1911CentnerAcademy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.93%, Gemini Reason: Username '1911CentnerAcademy' appears to be promotional as it represents the name of an organization, 'Centner Academy', which is a private school. This violates the policy against promotional usernames. Please choose a username that does not represent a company or organization.
• MyAuto UScom: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.93%, Gemini Reason: The username 'MyAuto UScom' is promotional as it strongly resembles a company or website name, containing 'Auto' suggesting automotive business and 'UScom' resembling a domain name. This violates the policy against promotional usernames. Recommend talk page message and UAA if edits.
• Personnel Olline: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.90%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Personnel Olline' uses the term 'Personnel' which can be associated with a company department or function, potentially implying a shared or promotional username. While 'Olline' makes it less definitively corporate, it is borderline. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy regarding promotional and shared usernames and request they consider a change. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report may be warranted to further review.
• Stiftung Manufactura Tessanda Val Müstair: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.88%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Stiftung Manufactura Tessanda Val Müstair' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organization, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Pyrrhicpressorg: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.85%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Pyrrhicpressorg' could be interpreted as a promotional username representing a company or organization (e.g., 'Pyrrhic Press Organization'). It is recommended to leave a talk page message explaining the concern and requesting clarification or a username change. If the user edits, a UAA report may be necessary.
• Salebot37: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.84%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'bot' which may be misleading as it could imply the account is a bot, violating the policy against misleading usernames that could be mistaken for bot accounts. Please leave a talk page message to inquire about the user's intent and suggest a username change if it is not a bot account. File a UAA report if the user edits after receiving the message without addressing the username concern.
• Amicuslifesciences: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.84%, Gemini Reason: Username appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that does not represent a company.
• Brussels Urban Sessions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.83%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Brussels Urban Sessions' appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organized event, which violates the username policy. Please change your username to comply with the policy.
• DiavoloBand: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.83%, Gemini Reason: Username 'DiavoloBand' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a musical group or band, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message requesting a username change and filing a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Wiki-bot-latam: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.82%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Wiki-bot-latam' resembles a bot username, which is misleading for non-bot accounts. Usernames that could be easily mistaken for bot accounts are not permitted unless the account is a registered bot. Please clarify if this is a bot account or choose a different username if it is a personal account to avoid misleading other editors. If no clarification or username change happens and the user edits, a UAA report may be filed.
• Geeta Univeristy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.81%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Geeta Univeristy' unambiguously represents the name of a university, which is an organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Action is set to uaa_if_edit to notify the user and report to UAA if editing occurs.
• Salebot39: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.74%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Salebot39' is potentially misleading as it contains 'bot', which could imply a bot account, and 'Sale' could be interpreted as promotional. It is recommended to leave a talk page message to clarify if the user intends to operate a bot or if the username is related to a company or product. File a UAA report if the user edits in a way that suggests bot-like activity or promotional intent after being notified.
• Skibidi toilet09845: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.72%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Skibidi toilet09845' is unserious and meme-related, which could be seen as mildly disruptive. Monitor edits; UAA if edits are problematic.
• Heart of Oneness Holistic Expo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.71%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Heart of Oneness Holistic Expo' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organized event, violating the policy against promotional usernames.
• Sisu Collective: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.64%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Sisu Collective' implies shared use, as 'collective' suggests a group or organization, violating the policy against shared accounts. It also resembles a promotional username, as it could be interpreted as the name of a company, organization, or group. This is against username policy.
• Gay.one.füwa: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.63%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the term 'Gay' which could be seen as potentially provocative or attracting disruption. While not inherently offensive, it is advisable to inform the user about potential misinterpretations and ask them to consider a different username. File UAA report if the user edits after this message to monitor for any disruptive behavior.
• IHateSchooler134: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.62%, Gemini Reason: Username "IHateSchooler134" contains the word "Hate" which could be seen as disruptive or offensive under the username policy, potentially making harmonious editing difficult. While not explicitly targeting a protected group or being profane, it expresses a negative sentiment that could be interpreted as trolling or intended to provoke negative reactions. A talk page message is recommended to advise the user to consider a more neutral username. UAA report if edits are made after this notification.
• TheOfficialAgenda: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.59%, Gemini Reason: The username 'TheOfficialAgenda' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use, suggesting an organization or group rather than an individual. It also carries a potentially misleading tone implying official status. Please consider choosing a username that clearly represents an individual. If edits are made, a UAA report may be filed.
• Smartconsultants: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.58%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Smartconsultants' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is likely intended to represent a consulting business.
• BLGComms: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.56%, Gemini Reason: Username 'BLGComms' appears to be promotional as it could represent a company or organization (e.g., BLG Communications), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• MarketingDevisionIDS: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.56%, Gemini Reason: Username 'MarketingDevisionIDS' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company division/department (Marketing Division) and implies shared use, violating username policy regarding company/group names and shared accounts. 'IDS' further suggests initials of a company name. This username is not appropriate for individual use on Wikipedia.
• Advologysolutions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.56%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Advologysolutions' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company name, 'Advology Solutions'. This violates the policy against usernames that unambiguously represent company names. Action 'uaa_if_edit' is recommended to notify the user and file a UAA report if they edit with this username after notification.
• Communication Congebec: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.53%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Communication Congebec' appears to be promotional, representing a company or organization, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person and does not promote a company or organization.
• Kuchoriyatechsoft: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.52%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Kuchoriyatechsoft' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company name ('Kuchoriya Technologies Soft Pvt Ltd'). This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if edits are made.
• Naveedkhannllc: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.52%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Naveedkhannllc' appears to be promotional as it likely represents a company name due to the 'llc' suffix, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message will be left requesting a username change and a UAA report will be filed if edits are made after this notice.
• Socertifiedentertainment: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.42%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Socertifiedentertainment' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name related to entertainment, violating the policy against promotional usernames.
• American.food.menu100.com703: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.39%, Gemini Reason: The username 'American.food.menu100.com703' appears promotional as it contains '.com' and resembles a website or business name related to 'American food menu', violating the policy against promotional usernames. Please advise the user to choose a compliant username.
• Salebot38: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.38%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Salebot38' implies the account is a bot, which is misleading and violates the username policy unless it is a registered bot account. Please clarify if this is a bot account or request a username change if it is a personal account.
• Ktn rwanda ltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.38%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ktn rwanda ltd' appears to be a company name, indicated by 'ltd', violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Beckfart64: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.34%, Gemini Reason: The username "Beckfart64" contains the word "fart", which is considered a mild profanity and may be offensive or disruptive to other editors. While not extremely offensive, it is generally considered inappropriate for a professional collaborative environment like Wikipedia. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Think Tours Cameroon: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.33%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Think Tours Cameroon' appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Miss Leigh's Piano Studio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.32%, Gemini Reason: Username "Miss Leigh's Piano Studio" is promotional as it represents a business/organization name (piano studio). It also implies shared use as it is likely used by the business rather than an individual. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• LlcInsurance: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.32%, Gemini Reason: Username 'LlcInsurance' is promotional. It unambiguously represents a company or organization name related to 'LLC Insurance', violating the username policy against promotional usernames. Please choose a username that represents an individual person and not a company or organization.
• Le Poo 747: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.29%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'Poo', a term for feces, which can be considered mildly profane and disruptive. While not severely offensive, it is inappropriate for a professional environment like Wikipedia and could be seen as disruptive. Recommend a talk page message and UAA if the user edits after notification.
• GETOUTOFMYHEADGETOUTOFMYHEAD: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.24%, Gemini Reason: Username 'GETOUTOFMYHEADGETOUTOFMYHEAD' is emotionally charged and could be interpreted as disruptive or attention-seeking, potentially making harmonious editing difficult. While not explicitly profane or offensive, it may cause negative emotional reactions and is not conducive to a positive collaborative environment. It falls under the category of usernames that are likely to cause disruption to productive Wikipedia processes or discussions.
• AI Summit Kitzbühel: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.23%, Gemini Reason: The username 'AI Summit Kitzbühel' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of an organized event, violating the policy against promotional usernames. It also implies shared use as it represents an event/organization.
• PoeCenterEdu: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.16%, Gemini Reason: The username 'PoeCenterEdu' appears promotional, suggesting representation of an educational center or organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend username change. UAA if edits continue.
• Thebajeltd: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.07%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Thebajeltd' appears to be promotional as 'ltd' is a common abbreviation for 'Limited', suggesting it represents a company or organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left to request a username change and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after receiving the message.
• Laborteam: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.06%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Laborteam' could be interpreted as representing a company, organization, or group, which is discouraged as potentially promotional or implying shared use. Please clarify if this is a personal username or intended to represent a group. We will monitor for edits and report to UAA if promotional editing is observed.
• Rajwade customs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.03%, Gemini Reason: The username "Rajwade customs" strongly resembles a company or organizational name, potentially violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. It is not overtly offensive or disruptive, so a talk page message and UAA report if they edit after notification is the most appropriate course of action.
• Todayshomebuyersguide: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.90%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Todayshomebuyersguide' appears to be promotional, resembling a website or business name related to home buying guides, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report filed if edits are made after notification.
• Upsouth School: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.84%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Upsouth School' appears to represent a school, which is an organization. This may violate the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits.
• TMBmedia: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.76%, Gemini Reason: The username 'TMBmedia' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name related to media. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change. A UAA report should be filed if the user edits after being notified.
• Hmu.university: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.76%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Hmu.university' resembles a promotional username as it could be interpreted as the name of a university or organization related to universities, which is against the policy on promotional usernames. It also has a domain-like structure which can be seen as promotional. Please choose a username that does not represent a company, organization, or website.
• Officialthings 5: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.74%, Gemini Reason: Username "Officialthings 5" is potentially misleading and borderline promotional as "Officialthings" could be interpreted as representing an organization or entity, especially with the added number. While not explicitly violating the policy for immediate block, it is advisable to leave a talk page message explaining username guidelines and request a username change if it represents a company, organization, or shared account. Monitor edits for promotional behavior or misrepresentation.
• Appient Technologies: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.69%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Appient Technologies' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames. Please change your username to comply with policy.
• Dexterballs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.52%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Dexterballs' contains a word with slang sexual connotations ('balls'). While not explicitly profane or hateful, it could be considered slightly offensive or disruptive due to its suggestive nature. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the potential issue and suggest a username change. File a UAA report if the user edits after this notification and continues with potentially disruptive behavior, or if the username demonstrably causes disruption.
• FeridRecords: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.46%, Gemini Reason: The username 'FeridRecords' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a music recording company or label. It is ambiguous, so a talk page message should be left. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report should be filed to assess for promotional intent.
• Nomadog.store: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.41%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Nomadog.store' appears to be promotional. The '.store' top-level domain strongly suggests a website or online business, which violates the policy against promotional usernames. Recommend leaving a talk page message and filing a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• SaraMar Pictures: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.35%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SaraMar Pictures' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company or organization name related to photography or film production. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy, and a UAA report filed if they edit after notification.
• Totally legit edits 69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.25%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Totally legit edits 69' is potentially borderline disruptive due to possible sarcasm or mild innuendo (the number 69). While not overtly offensive or promotional, it's ambiguous and could be interpreted negatively. A talk page message is recommended to inquire about the user's intent and suggest a clearer username. File UAA if disruptive edits follow.
• Azplasttech MMC: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.21%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Azplasttech MMC' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name (likely related to 'plastic technology' and 'MMC' which often stands for 'Limited Liability Company' or similar company structure). This also implies shared use, violating username policy. Recommend talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• Prestige Spring Heights Contact Us: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.20%, Gemini Reason: Username "Prestige Spring Heights Contact Us" appears to be promotional as it unambiguously represents a company, organization, or service, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username or it will be blocked.
• Bockfamily: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.17%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Bockfamily' could be interpreted as representing a family business or group, which might violate the policy against promotional usernames or usernames implying shared use. It is ambiguous and could also be a personal username. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy, specifically regarding promotional and shared usernames. If the user edits after this message, and their edits or further clarification indicate a policy violation, a UAA report should be filed.
• Coleman News: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Coleman News' is promotional as it suggests a news organization, violating the policy against company/organization usernames and implying shared use.
• KICI FM: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.12%, Gemini Reason: Username 'KICI FM' is promotional as it directly represents the name of a radio station, KICI-FM, which is a company/organization. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person, not a company or organization.
• CARLITO officiel: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.10%, Gemini Reason: The username 'CARLITO officiel' could be misleading as 'officiel' (French for 'official') might imply official status or affiliation, violating the policy against misleading usernames. Please consider choosing a username that does not suggest official status.
• 3unionstartup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.06%, Gemini Reason: Username '3unionstartup' is likely promotional as it strongly suggests the name of a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left for the user explaining the policy violation, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Asfasffjfjfjas;dfjfjjf: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.03%, Gemini Reason: Username contains a semicolon ';', which is a non-language symbol and violates the non-script usernames policy regarding non-script usernames. This is a minor technical violation, and a talk page message should be left, with a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Arzaqi TechnologyXD: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.99%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Arzaqi TechnologyXD' is promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name ('Technology'). Additionally, 'XD' could be interpreted as an emoticon, which is also discouraged. This falls under promotional usernames and potentially non-script usernames policy violations. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• Joni Hamilton at Baylor College of Medicine: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.99%, Gemini Reason: The username "Joni Hamilton at Baylor College of Medicine" may violate the promotional usernames policy and usernames implying shared use policy by including the name of an organization, "Baylor College of Medicine". While it includes a personal name and the "at" structure, it still leans towards being promotional and potentially implies shared use. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• AmogusBOT: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.92%, Gemini Reason: Username 'AmogusBOT' may be misleading as it includes 'BOT', which usually indicates a bot account. Please clarify if this account is intended to be a bot. If not, the username may need to be changed to avoid confusion. Usernames implying bot status are discouraged for non-bot accounts.
• GROUP2-QUEZON: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.92%, Gemini Reason: Username 'GROUP2-QUEZON' implies shared use, as 'GROUP2' suggests a group or organization, and 'QUEZON' could be a location or part of the group's name. This violates the policy against usernames that imply shared use. It could also be seen as potentially promotional if it represents a specific organization. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change. File a UAA report if the user edits after this notification.
• Usjuniorleague: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.91%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Usjuniorleague' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use as it resembles an organization or league name. Recommend leaving a talk page message to inquire about username and monitor for promotional editing. If promotional editing is observed, report to UAA.
• Libre Media Niger: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.86%, Gemini Reason: Username "Libre Media Niger" appears to be promotional as it represents a media organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy violation and request a username change. If the user edits after notification, a UAA report should be filed.
• AstranaHealth: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.78%, Gemini Reason: The username 'AstranaHealth' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Journalisten-Agentur: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.77%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Journalisten-Agentur' (German for 'Journalist Agency') unambiguously represents a company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Action: UAA report if user edits.
• Syndicat Mixte Pays du Mans: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.76%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Syndicat Mixte Pays du Mans' appears to be promotional as it represents the name of an organization, which is not permitted. Usernames that unambiguously represent organizations violate the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to request a username change. If the user edits after notification, a UAA report should be filed.
• BundacovOffical: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.75%, Gemini Reason: The username 'BundacovOffical' is potentially misleading due to the misspelling 'Offical' which may imply an official affiliation or promotional intent, especially if 'Bundacov' is a brand or organization name. It is recommended to leave a talk page message to the user to inquire about the intent. If the user edits after this message without addressing the username concern, a UAA report should be filed.
• Ballser79: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.75%, Gemini Reason: The username "Ballser79" could be interpreted as mildly offensive slang, potentially falling under disruptive usernames due to containing a word that may be considered profane or offensive in some contexts. While not blatantly offensive, it warrants a talk page message to inform the user about the potential issue and suggest a username change. A UAA report should be filed if the user edits after being notified.
• Communauté de Communes Roussillon Conflent: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.75%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Communauté de Communes Roussillon Conflent' is promotional as it represents the name of an organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person.
• Dboldrecords: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.73%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Dboldrecords' is potentially promotional as it could represent a record label or music production company. While not explicitly violating, it is borderline and warrants a talk page message to inquire about its nature and intent, and to request a username change if it is indeed promotional. Report to UAA if promotional editing is observed or if the user edits after being notified without addressing the username concern.
• Nguyễn hoàng band: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.73%, Gemini Reason: Username appears to be promotional as it resembles a band name, which is not permitted according to the username policy. Please choose a username that does not represent a company, organization, group, or product.
• JaredOwenAnimations: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.73%, Gemini Reason: The username 'JaredOwenAnimations' could be interpreted as promotional, representing an animation company or service. It is ambiguous and not clearly a personal username. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the promotional username policy and request clarification or a username change if it represents a company or brand. UAA report if edits are made after notification.
• Vedic Ads: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.68%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Vedic Ads' is promotional as it represents a company or organization related to Vedic advertising. Promotional usernames are not permitted per username policy. Please choose a username that represents an individual person and does not promote a company or service. If edits are made with this username after this notification, a UAA report will be filed.
• Outkastpandacrew: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.59%, Gemini Reason: The username "Outkastpandacrew" contains the name of a musical group "Outkast", which could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use. However, it is not unambiguously a company or organization name. It could be a fan username. To assume good faith, a talk page message is recommended to inquire about the username's purpose. If the user engages in promotional editing, a UAA report should be filed.
• Teamcampapp: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.54%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Teamcampapp' appears to be promotional, suggesting a company, organization, product, or application name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames.
• Telemundo Puerto Rico: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.53%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Telemundo Puerto Rico' is promotional as it represents the name of a company/organization (TV channel). This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend username change and will report to UAA if edits are made.
• Leyden Academy, Stephanie: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.49%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Leyden Academy, Stephanie' may violate the username policy as it resembles a promotional username. 'Leyden Academy' sounds like an organization or institution, and appending ', Stephanie' does not fully negate the impression of representing an organization. This could be interpreted as a username that unambiguously represents a company or organization, which is not permitted under the promotional usernames guideline. It also raises concerns about shared use. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the user's affiliation and suggest a username change if necessary. If the user edits after this notification without addressing the username concern, a UAA report might be warranted.
• Employeebranding: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.44%, Gemini Reason: The username "Employeebranding" is promotional as it strongly suggests the account represents a business, organization, or service related to employee branding, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• R2d2bot82: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.38%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'bot', which may be misleading and imply the account is a bot, violating the misleading usernames policy. A talk page message should be left to inform the user and request a username change. File a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Marketingarmorine: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.33%, Gemini Reason: Username "Marketingarmorine" appears to be promotional, suggesting a company or marketing service name. This violates the policy against promotional usernames. Recommend informing the user and requesting a username change, and report to UAA if edits are made after notification.
• Noseeeeeeeeecrack: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.25%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Noseeeeeeeeecrack' contains the word 'crack' which can be considered vulgar slang and potentially offensive under the disruptive usernames policy. While not explicitly profane, it could be interpreted as offensive and cause disruption. A talk page message should be left to request a username change. Report to UAA if the user edits after this notice.
• Twisted Studios: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.24%, Gemini Reason: The username "Twisted Studios" is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company or creative group name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to comply with the policy.
• Geocleanventures: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Geocleanventures' is promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name, violating the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Request username change.
• MAGACorrections: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.13%, Gemini Reason: The username "MAGACorrections" is politically charged and potentially disruptive due to its association with the "MAGA" slogan. While not explicitly offensive in itself, it may alienate other users and create a hostile environment. A talk page message should be left to advise the user about the potential issues and suggest a username change. If the user edits with this username, especially in politically sensitive areas, a UAA report may be warranted.
• DarkXWolf17(bite me): DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.11%, Gemini Reason: The username 'DarkXWolf17(bite me)' contains the phrase '(bite me)' which can be interpreted as provocative and potentially disruptive due to its confrontational tone. While not explicitly profane, it could be seen as intending to provoke negative reactions from other editors, potentially falling under disruptive usernames. A talk page message is warranted, and a UAA report should be filed if edits are made.
• American.breakfast.menu320.com220: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.00%, Gemini Reason: Username resembles a promotional username due to the inclusion of ".com" and the phrase "American breakfast menu", which could be interpreted as a business or product name, suggesting a website or company. This potentially violates the policy against promotional usernames.
• FriendsofSJM: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.92%, Gemini Reason: The username 'FriendsofSJM' may violate the policy against usernames implying shared use or promotional usernames, as 'Friends of SJM' suggests a group or organization. It is not overtly offensive or disruptive, so a talk page message should be left to inquire about the nature of the username and a UAA report filed if promotional editing is observed.
• Healthministry001: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.84%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Healthministry001' is promotional as it unambiguously represents an organization, which is not permitted per username policy (promotional usernames, usernames implying shared use). It is recommended to leave a talk page message and file a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Officialtiltedtripod: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.78%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Officialtiltedtripod' could be interpreted as promotional because 'Official' suggests it represents an organization, product, or group, although 'tiltedtripod' is not clearly a brand name. It's recommended to leave a talk page message explaining the promotional username policy and requesting clarification. If the user edits after receiving the message and the username is confirmed to be promotional, a UAA report should be filed.
• Marketingabb990: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.77%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Marketingabb990' is promotional as it strongly suggests it represents a marketing company or organization, violating the policy against promotional usernames.
• Managementcb: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.74%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Managementcb' is potentially promotional as 'Management' suggests an organization or company, and 'cb' could be initials. It is borderline and not clearly violating, but warrants a talk page message to inquire about potential company affiliation and inform about the username policy. If the user edits after this, a UAA report is warranted due to potential promotional username.
• SatanClaus69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.73%, Gemini Reason: The username "SatanClaus69" is potentially offensive and disruptive. The combination of "Satan" with "Claus" and "69" could be seen as deliberately provocative and trolling, which may offend other editors and disrupt harmonious editing. A talk page message should be left to request a username change. If the user edits after this message, a UAA report may be necessary.
• ChrisRacing PR: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.69%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ChrisRacing PR' appears promotional. 'PR' likely stands for Public Relations, and 'ChrisRacing' suggests a brand or team name. This combination indicates a promotional username representing a company, organization, or product, which is against username policy.
• Viion Systems: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.63%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Viion Systems' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name, which violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommended action is to leave a talk page message and file a UAA report if the user edits.
• NangaiNaturals: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'NangaiNaturals' could be interpreted as a promotional username representing a company or brand name related to natural products, which is against policy. It is ambiguous and requires clarification from the user. Recommend leaving a talk page message to inquire about the nature of the username and to advise on username policy. If the user edits after this notification and the username is confirmed to be promotional, a UAA report should be filed.
• Shingekistudios1: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.52%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Shingekistudios1' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a company, organization, or creative group named 'Shingeki Studios'. It is advisable to leave a talk page message to inquire about the user's affiliation and purpose of the username. If promotional editing occurs, a UAA report should be filed.
• Xpresslogistics: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.33%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Xpresslogistics' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, likely in the logistics sector. This also implies shared use, which violates the username policy (Promotional usernames and Usernames implying shared use). Please choose a username that represents you as an individual, not a company or organization.
• GBPatchCommunity: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.30%, Gemini Reason: Username 'GBPatchCommunity' may be promotional, representing a company, organization, or group. It could also imply shared use. Further context is needed to determine policy violation. Action: talk message and UAA if promotional editing occurs.
• ApostolicChurchSpinettaMarengo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.29%, Gemini Reason: The username 'ApostolicChurchSpinettaMarengo' is promotional as it represents the name of a religious organization. Usernames that unambiguously represent organizations are not permitted as they are considered promotional and imply shared use.
• The Boulevard Club: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.23%, Gemini Reason: Username 'The Boulevard Club' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a club, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use (company/group names). A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• The foodbank: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.22%, Gemini Reason: The username 'The foodbank' unambiguously represents an organization, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report filed if edits are made with this username.
• MAGAlover: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.21%, Gemini Reason: Username "MAGAlover" is politically charged and references a highly contentious slogan ("Make America Great Again"). While not explicitly offensive, it is likely to be disruptive and offend other contributors, making harmonious editing difficult due to its strong political connotations, falling under the disruptive usernames policy. Recommend a talk page message and UAA report if user edits.
• Miss Empowerment Grand International: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.17%, Gemini Reason: Username "Miss Empowerment Grand International" is promotional as it unambiguously represents an organization or event name, specifically a pageant or similar group focused on empowerment, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Request username change on talk page and file UAA if user edits without changing.
• Ydvconstruction: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ydvconstruction' appears promotional as it may represent a company or organization related to construction. Company/organization usernames are not permitted. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• Jeffbot2: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.05%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Jeffbot2' is potentially misleading as it includes 'bot', suggesting it might be a bot account, which is against policy unless it is registered and approved as a bot. This falls under misleading usernames. Recommend leaving a talk page message to inquire if it is a bot and request a username change if not. File UAA if edits are made after notification without clarification.
• Blueberry Software: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.05%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Blueberry Software' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. This kind of username is not allowed as accounts are for individual users, not companies.
• AssociGiENiStAItaliana: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.97%, Gemini Reason: Username 'AssociGiENiStAItaliana' may be interpreted as promotional, resembling an association or organization name. It is ambiguous and requires clarification from the user. If used for promotional purposes, it violates the username policy.
• Dalex Socials: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.89%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Dalex Socials' may be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, potentially violating username policy regarding promotional usernames. Please clarify if this is a company name or if it represents an individual. If it represents a company, a username change is recommended. If edits are made before username change or clarification, a UAA report may be filed.
• Bakkahtransport: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.86%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Bakkahtransport' strongly resembles a company or organization name related to transportation services. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please change your username to one that represents an individual person and does not promote a company. If edits are made with this username, a report to UAA will be necessary.
• Anonbot98: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.79%, Gemini Reason: Username contains "bot", which is misleading as it implies the account is a bot account, violating the "Misleading usernames" policy section. Recommend talk page message and UAA if user edits after notification.
• Group1-QUEZON: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.78%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Group1-QUEZON' could be interpreted as representing a group or organization, which may fall under promotional or shared use usernames. While not unambiguously violating the policy, it warrants a talk page message to inquire about the user's intent. If the user engages in promotional editing, a UAA report may be necessary.
• Socialcamp.ind: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.68%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Socialcamp.ind' appears to be promotional as it strongly resembles a company name ('Social Camp India') and a domain-like extension. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after the message.
• Ain7newstimes: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.64%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ain7newstimes' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a news organization. Please clarify if this username represents a company, organization, website, product, or group. If so, it may violate the username policy against promotional usernames. If this is not the case, no further action is needed. If you continue to edit with this username and it appears promotional, a UAA report may be filed.
• Mackay Electorate: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.63%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a political electorate, which can be interpreted as a group or organization name. This may fall under usernames implying shared use or promotional usernames (in a non-commercial sense). Recommend leaving a talk page message to clarify the username's purpose and suggest a username change if it represents an organization rather than an individual. File UAA if edits are made after this message.
• GamerCommunity: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.62%, Gemini Reason: Username 'GamerCommunity' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use as it may represent a specific gaming community group. While not definitively violating policy, it is borderline. Monitor edits for promotional activity or representation of a specific organization. UAA report may be warranted if such activity is observed.
• OFFICAL GOGGLE REPOTER: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.60%, Gemini Reason: The username 'OFFICAL GOGGLE REPOTER' is potentially misleading and borderline promotional. 'OFFICAL' sounds like 'official' and 'GOGGLE' closely resembles 'Google', a well-known company. 'REPOTER' sounds like 'reporter'. This combination could be misinterpreted as an account representing an official reporting function related to Google, which is misleading. It also has promotional connotations due to the strong association with 'Google'. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• GoogleOpenSourceUofMN"J": DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.34%, Gemini Reason: Username represents organizations (Google Open Source and University of Minnesota), which is considered promotional and implies shared use. Please change your username to comply with policy.
• PLEASELORDGrantMeTOTALObedience: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.32%, Gemini Reason: The username "PLEASELORDGrantMeTOTALObedience" could be seen as disruptive due to its religious nature and the implication of "TOTALObedience", which may be considered proselytizing or make some users uncomfortable. It is borderline disruptive and a talk page message should be left. Escalate to UAA if user edits without changing username after notification.
• DivulgacionCCNN: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.31%, Gemini Reason: Username 'DivulgacionCCNN' could be interpreted as a promotional username, potentially representing an organization or group related to 'divulgacion' (disclosure/dissemination) and 'CCNN' (likely an acronym). While not overtly promotional, it warrants a talk page message to inquire about the username's intent. File a UAA report if the user engages in promotional editing or continues to use the username after notification without clarification.
• Awistudio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.22%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Awistudio' may be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name. If the account is used for promotional purposes, it will violate Wikipedia's username policy. Please review the policy on promotional usernames and consider choosing a different username if this account represents a company or organization. If you proceed with promotional editing, this account may be blocked.
• Arwstudio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.94%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Arwstudio' may violate the username policy as it could be interpreted as a promotional username representing a company, organization, or creative group (studio). Please leave a talk page message explaining the promotional username policy and requesting clarification. If the user edits after this message, file a UAA report.
• FTA TRANSIT!: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.93%, Gemini Reason: The username 'FTA TRANSIT!' could be interpreted as representing a transportation organization, which falls under promotional usernames (company/organization names). However, it is not unambiguously promotional. A talk page message should be left asking for clarification. If the user edits after this message, and it's still unclear or promotional editing occurs, a UAA report may be necessary.
• Fukienschoolisavery: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.92%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Fukienschoolisavery' closely resembles a profanity ('fucking school is a very...'), which may be considered offensive or disruptive. Please consider changing your username. If edits are made with this username after this notice, a UAA report may be filed.
• Stefan Webdesign: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.82%, Gemini Reason: Username "Stefan Webdesign" could be interpreted as promotional as "Webdesign" represents a service, and combined with a personal name "Stefan" it could be seen as a business name. While not unambiguously promotional, it is borderline and may imply promotion of web design services. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the promotional username policy and request clarification or username change if it represents a business or service, and a UAA report should be filed if the user engages in promotional editing.
• Sobhasolispropertyi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.77%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Sobhasolispropertyi' is promotional. It strongly resembles a company or project name, likely related to real estate. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames. User should be asked to change their username and reported to UAA if they edit.
• Bluff City IT: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.69%, Gemini Reason: The username "Bluff City IT" may be promotional as it could represent a company or organization name. It is ambiguous and requires clarification. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy and request a username change if it is indeed a company name. If promotional editing occurs, a UAA report should be filed.
• Rsaforextraders: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Rsaforextraders' appears promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name related to Forex trading. Usernames representing company or organization names are not permitted as promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left to address this potential violation and request a username change if it is indeed a promotional username. If the user edits after this notice, a UAA report should be filed.
• Sonic fandom new's: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.50%, Gemini Reason: The username "Sonic fandom new's" could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use, as it resembles the name of a news outlet or group related to the Sonic fandom. It is borderline promotional and warrants a talk page message explaining username policy. A UAA report should be filed if the user edits after this message.
• Goonerrjelqer2727: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.44%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Goonerrjelqer2727' contains 'jelqer' which has sexual connotations and could be seen as mildly disruptive. While 'Gooner' is generally acceptable, the combination might be seen as questionable. Please consider choosing a different username that is more clearly aligned with Wikipedia's username policy. If edits are made with this username, a report to Username for Administrator Attention (UAA) may be filed.
• Jet AdventuresUK: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.25%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Jet AdventuresUK' appears to be promotional as it likely represents a company or organization name ('Jet Adventures') and location ('UK'). This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Report to UAA if user edits.
• ASNEOFFICIAL: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.13%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ASNEOFFICIAL' appears to represent an organization or group, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy sections on promotional usernames and shared use. Recommend user to choose a username that represents an individual person and does not imply organizational affiliation.
• EDUNAMIINDIA: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.12%, Gemini Reason: Username 'EDUNAMIINDIA' appears to be promotional as it strongly suggests a company or organization name related to education in India. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Recommend leaving a talk page message requesting a username change and filing a UAA report if the user edits after notification.
• Ajmalbabums: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.03%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ajmalbabums' may be perceived as unprofessional or slightly disruptive due to its similarity to 'baboons'. While not explicitly offensive, it's advisable to use a username that is clearly professional and avoids potential misinterpretations. Please consider choosing a different username. We will monitor for edits and file a UAA report if disruptive editing occurs or the username becomes problematic in context.
• Joe Warren Music: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.00%, Gemini Reason: Username appears promotional as it resembles a musical artist/group name. May violate username policy regarding promotional usernames or usernames implying shared use. Please clarify if this username represents a musical group or company.
• Denote Editions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.96%, Gemini Reason: Username "Denote Editions" appears to be promotional as it could represent a company, organization, or creative group, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change. If promotional editing occurs or the user ignores the message, a UAA report might be warranted.
• Expandkancare: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.81%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Expandkancare' appears to be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name, potentially related to healthcare. Promotional usernames are not permitted as per policy. Please clarify if this username represents a company, organization, product, or service. If so, a username change is required. If you edit further with this username and it is deemed promotional, a report to Usernames for Administrator Attention (UAA) may be filed.
• Verein-Southernstars: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.80%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Verein-Southernstars' appears to represent a group or organization name, which violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. 'Verein' is German for 'association' or 'club'. This is not a severely offensive or disruptive username, so a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits is the appropriate action.
• Mr all i know it is you baby hi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.79%, Gemini Reason: The username "Mr all i know it is you baby hi" is slightly suggestive and could be seen as potentially disruptive or attention-seeking due to the phrase "baby hi". While not explicitly offensive, it is not ideally suited for an encyclopedic environment. Recommend a talk page message and UAA report if the user edits.
• PerfectiongeeksTechnologies: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.69%, Gemini Reason: Username "PerfectiongeeksTechnologies" appears to be a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use as it unambiguously represents a company or organization. This falls under the category of promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use which are not permitted.
• Elitetechtools: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.68%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Elitetechtools' is potentially promotional as it could represent a company or organization name related to technology tools. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use if it represents a company. Please check if this username represents a company, product, or organization. If so, it needs to be changed. If the user edits after this notification and it is confirmed to be promotional, a UAA report may be necessary.
• Kunstschule Artgeschoss: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.63%, Gemini Reason: Username "Kunstschule Artgeschoss" appears to be promotional as it represents the name of an organization (art school). This also implies shared use, which is against username policy. A talk page message should be left to request a username change. If the user edits after this message, a UAA report should be filed.
• CDA FRANCE: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.61%, Gemini Reason: The username 'CDA FRANCE' could be interpreted as a promotional username representing a company or organization based in France. It is borderline promotional and warrants monitoring for potential promotional editing. A talk page message should be left for the user, and a UAA report should be filed if they engage in promotional editing.
• Fatherofmafiyanasirahmed: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.54%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Fatherofmafiyanasirahmed' uses the term 'Mafia', which can be associated with organized crime and violence. While not explicitly profane, it may be considered disruptive or offensive to some users and could make harmonious editing difficult. It is recommended to leave a talk page message requesting a username change. If the user edits after this message, a UAA report may be warranted if the username is still deemed problematic.
• Sector13.Studio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.53%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Sector13.Studio' is promotional as it strongly resembles a company or organization name, particularly with the '.Studio' TLD, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. This falls under the 'Company/group names' section of inappropriate usernames.
• DUCKMAZDA: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.46%, Gemini Reason: Username contains 'MAZDA', a company name, which could be interpreted as promotional. However, with 'DUCK' prefix, it's ambiguous and could be personal. Advise user on username policy and monitor for promotional editing.
• Bobscustomshop: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.44%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Bobscustomshop' is potentially promotional as it could represent a business name, specifically a custom shop. It is ambiguous, but leans towards violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change. UAA report if user edits after notification.
• AustinGay11: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.41%, Gemini Reason: The username 'AustinGay11' could be seen as slightly provocative due to the inclusion of 'Gay', although not overtly offensive. It is borderline and could potentially cause disruption. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about username policy and suggest considering a change. If the user edits after this notification, a UAA report may be warranted.
• ATLATL Center: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.29%, Gemini Reason: Username 'ATLATL Center' appears to represent a company, organization, or institution, which is considered a promotional username and implies shared use, violating username policy. Please leave a talk page message to request a username change. File a UAA report if edits are made without username change after notification.
• Nintendo Club: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.24%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Nintendo Club' is promotional as it unambiguously represents the name of a club, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use.
• Stroshe.SEO: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.16%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Stroshe.SEO' appears promotional as it includes the top-level domain '.SEO', suggesting a connection to Search Engine Optimization services. This could be interpreted as advertising or intending to promote SEO-related content. A talk page message should be left explaining the promotional username policy and requesting a username change. File a UAA report if the user edits after receiving the message.
• Tanzschule MOVE!iT: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.05%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Tanzschule MOVE!iT' appears to be promotional as it represents a business name (dance school in German). Promotional usernames are not permitted. A talk page message should be left to request a username change, and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after notification.
• Digital at Derma: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.05%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Digital at Derma' could be interpreted as promotional, as 'Derma' may represent a company, product, or organization related to dermatology. While usernames containing company names are sometimes permitted to denote an individual associated with the company, this username is borderline. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the potential promotional interpretation and request clarification/username change if necessary. File a UAA report if promotional editing occurs.
• StinkBombAdventure69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.00%, Gemini Reason: Username 'StinkBombAdventure69' could be seen as disruptive or offensive due to the negative connotation of 'StinkBomb' and sexual connotation of '69'. While not blatantly offensive, it has the potential to cause disruption or offense to some users. A talk page message is recommended, and a UAA report should be filed if edits are made after notification.
• Enter Your Username Here In this box: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.84%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Enter Your Username Here In this box' is placeholder text and not a valid username. It is disruptive as it is not a chosen username but rather instructional text, indicating a misunderstanding of the username creation process. Please choose a unique and appropriate username.
• Bumsakalaka12: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.83%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Bumsakalaka12' contains 'bum,' which can be considered mildly offensive or slang. While not explicitly profane, it might be seen as disruptive or inappropriate by some users. A talk page message is recommended to inform the user about the potential issue and request a username change if it is deemed problematic by the community. File a UAA report if the user edits after notification and the username is still considered problematic.
• Malaysiaonlinecas: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.76%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Malaysiaonlinecas' appears promotional as it strongly suggests a business or website related to online casinos in Malaysia. This violates the policy against promotional usernames.
• SwamiDayanandorg: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.70%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SwamiDayanandorg' appears to be promotional as it represents an organization, potentially violating username policy regarding company/organization names and shared use. Please change your username to one representing an individual. If edits are made with this username after notification, a UAA report may be filed.
• Vpitechnology: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.63%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Vpitechnology' may violate the username policy as it could be interpreted as a promotional username or a username implying shared use by unambiguously representing a company or organization name (related to 'VP' and 'technology'). It is recommended to choose a username that represents an individual person and does not promote a company or organization. Please leave a talk page message to inform the user and request a username change. If the user edits after receiving the message, a UAA report should be filed.
• Vikram Dental: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.56%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Vikram Dental' may be interpreted as promotional, representing a dental practice or business name. While not immediately blocking, this username is borderline promotional and could imply shared use if it represents a company. Please clarify if this username represents a company or if it is intended as a personal username indicating your profession. If used for promotional purposes or company representation, it violates username policy. A UAA report will be filed if promotional editing or company representation is observed.
• Somaipharma: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.49%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Somaipharma' is promotional as it unambiguously represents a company name, likely related to pharmaceuticals. This violates the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A UAA report will be filed if edits are made with this username.
• Hoovex Limited: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.39%, Gemini Reason: The username "Hoovex Limited" unambiguously represents a company name, violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left, and a UAA report filed if the user edits after notification.
• AgenciaPegajosa: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.37%, Gemini Reason: The username 'AgenciaPegajosa' (Spanish for 'Sticky Agency') could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a company or organization, specifically an agency. It is ambiguous and not overtly offensive or disruptive, but warrants a talk page message to inquire about its nature and purpose. A UAA report should be filed if promotional editing is observed.
• Gemeinde Bad Hofgastein: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.36%, Gemini Reason: Username represents a company or organization (Gemeinde Bad Hofgastein), violating the policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. Please choose a username that represents an individual person.
• EUDYLAESENCIAMUSICAL: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.36%, Gemini Reason: The username 'EUDYLAESENCIAMUSICAL' is likely promotional as it resembles a band or musical group name. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames. A talk page message should be left to inform the user, and a UAA report filed if they edit.
• Ilon mosque: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.08%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ilon mosque' is a clear impersonation of the famous person Elon Musk, violating the policy against misleading usernames. Usernames that impersonate famous people are not permitted as they may be misleading and disruptive. A talk page message should be left requesting a username change and a UAA report should be filed if the user edits after receiving the notification.
• Willyoudehumanizeme: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.07%, Gemini Reason: Username is potentially offensive and disruptive as it directly references 'dehumanization,' which could be seen as provocative and negatively impacting harmonious editing. It could be perceived as trolling. Please consider choosing a different username.

• Poopoopolice: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.90%, Gemini Reason: The username "Poopoopolice" uses a childish term ("poopoo") combined with "police," which might be considered mildly unprofessional or disruptive. While not explicitly profane, violent, threatening, or discriminatory, it's borderline inappropriate. A talk page message is recommended to inform the user about the username policy and suggest considering a change to a more professional username.
• Poop killer tatane: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.88%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the word 'poop' which can be considered mildly offensive or disruptive, and 'killer' which can be associated with violence, though context suggests juvenile humor rather than a serious threat. While not a severe violation requiring immediate UAA, a talk page message is advised to suggest a more appropriate username.
• Turtlebutt420: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.86%, Gemini Reason: The username "Turtlebutt420" may be considered mildly offensive or disruptive due to the combination of "butt" which can be seen as childishly vulgar, and "420" which is associated with cannabis culture. While not explicitly violating the policy against severely offensive usernames, it could be perceived as unprofessional or unserious for collaborative editing. A talk page message should be left to politely suggest a username change to something more appropriate for Wikipedia.
• Hamza bossssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.72%, Gemini Reason: The username is lengthy and contains excessive repetition ('s'). While not explicitly offensive or libelous, it could be seen as slightly disruptive due to its length and potential to be distracting in discussions. It is recommended to leave a talk page message explaining the username policy and suggesting a shorter, less repetitive username. If the user edits disruptively, further action may be needed.
• Skibiditoiletwillbemineyeahohiogyat: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.72%, Gemini Reason: The username is unusual and meme-based ('Skibidi Toilet' is an internet meme). While not overtly offensive, it could be perceived as slightly disruptive or distracting due to its nonsensical nature. It does not clearly violate policies regarding offensive, misleading, promotional, or shared usernames, but a talk page message is recommended to inform the user about username policy and suggest a more conventional username for productive contributions.
• Yourmom12356: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.67%, Gemini Reason: The username "Yourmom12356" could be seen as mildly disruptive or immature. While not explicitly offensive, 'Yourmom' jokes can be perceived negatively by some users. It is recommended to leave a talk page message advising the user to consider a more appropriate username in line with Wikipedia's collaborative environment. No immediate UAA report is necessary, but monitor for potentially disruptive editing.
• Freddy rodriguezgayman: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.43%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Freddy rodriguezgayman' contains the term 'gayman' which could be interpreted as offensive or disparaging towards gay men. While not explicitly profane, it may cause disruption or offense to other editors. A username change is recommended to ensure a harmonious editing environment.
• Ugly toilet: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.36%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ugly toilet' could be seen as mildly offensive or distasteful, potentially falling under disruptive usernames. It is recommended to leave a talk page message to the user explaining the potential issue and suggesting a username change. If the user continues to edit with this username after notification, further action may be considered.
• Zafar Mirza Music Producer: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.25%, Gemini Reason: The username "Zafar Mirza Music Producer" is potentially promotional as it includes a profession. While not a blatant company name, it could be interpreted as representing a business or brand. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the user's intent and potential conflict of interest, and to advise them about username policy and promotional editing. If promotional editing occurs, further action may be needed.
• Smellytoesuwu: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.24%, Gemini Reason: Username "Smellytoesuwu" is mildly inappropriate. "Smellytoes" is somewhat unpleasant and unprofessional, and "uwu" is an emoticon associated with unserious content. While not explicitly offensive or disruptive enough for immediate blocking, it is not a username that projects a professional or serious tone expected for constructive contributions to Wikipedia. A talk page message is recommended to suggest a username change to something more suitable.
• Rupert William Carter-Aaron William Farrell GOP Presidential Ticket 2028: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.17%, Gemini Reason: The username is slightly promotional by referencing a political ticket ("GOP Presidential Ticket 2028"), which could be seen as promoting a political entity. While not a blatant violation warranting immediate UAA, a talk page message is advised to inform the user about username policies, specifically regarding promotional usernames and potential misunderstandings. Further action (UAA report) may be needed if editing behavior confirms promotional intent or disruption.
• Skibidi toiletohiogyattriz: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.15%, Gemini Reason: The username "Skibidi toiletohiogyattriz" is unusual and may be perceived as unprofessional or distracting due to its nonsensical nature and potential association with internet meme culture. While not explicitly violating the disruptive or offensive username policy for immediate blocking, it is advisable to encourage the user to choose a more conventional username to better facilitate collaboration and maintain a professional environment. A talk page message should be left to politely suggest a username change.
• I hate school much: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.96%, Gemini Reason: The username 'I hate school much' is not overtly offensive or disruptive, but it expresses a negative sentiment that could be perceived as immature or unprofessional. While it doesn't strictly violate the disruptive or offensive username policy, it is advisable to leave a talk page message to the user. This message should gently explain the username policy and suggest considering a more neutral or constructive username, in line with the collaborative spirit of Wikipedia. This action is proactive and assumes good faith, offering guidance without immediate escalation to UAA.
• MikeOpenHWGroup: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.90%, Gemini Reason: Username "MikeOpenHWGroup" may be promotional or imply shared use as it contains "OpenHWGroup", which appears to be an organization name. Clarification is needed from the user to determine if the username represents an individual or an organization/promotional account.
• Theofficialtravisty: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.87%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Theofficialtravisty' could be seen as slightly misleading due to the prefix 'Theofficial' which might imply an official affiliation or authority. While 'travisty' itself is not inherently problematic, the combination could be interpreted as promotional or attempting to appear as an official account. It is recommended to leave a talk page message to the user explaining the potential issue and asking them to clarify their username's intent or consider renaming.
• Doginyouerdad: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.85%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Doginyouerdad' is potentially offensive and disruptive due to its suggestive nature, resembling 'Dog in your dad'. While not explicitly profane, it could be interpreted as disrespectful or inappropriate by other users. A talk page message is recommended to request a username change to avoid potential offense and maintain a harmonious editing environment.
• Martinsmartypanties: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.84%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Martinsmartypanties' contains the word 'panties' which could be seen as mildly suggestive or potentially offensive to some users, and may be considered disruptive to harmonious editing. While not a blatant violation requiring immediate block, a talk page message is recommended to advise the user to consider a more appropriate username.
• Officialgideoninioluwaayanwale: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.83%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Officialgideoninioluwaayanwale' uses the term 'Official' which can be seen as potentially misleading by implying authority or affiliation. While 'gideoninioluwaayanwale' appears to be a personal name, the combination is unusual and could be interpreted as promotional or implying a position. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the intent behind 'Official' and ensure it aligns with username policies, specifically regarding misleading and promotional usernames. If the user engages in promotional editing or the 'Official' part is clearly meant to represent a brand or organization, further action may be needed.
• Ssyma records: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.71%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ssyma records' may be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a company, organization, or musical group. Please clarify the nature of this username and consider changing it if it represents a company or brand.
• Andrewproductions: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.65%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Andrewproductions' may be interpreted as promotional as it could represent a company or organization name related to 'productions'. While 'Andrew' is a common name, the combination with 'productions' raises concern about potential promotional intent or shared use. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the nature of the username and whether it represents a company, organization, or individual. If it is promotional, it violates the username policy.
• Stumble guysarebigbigbig: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.55%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the name of a game, "Stumble Guys", and might be considered promotional. It is recommended to leave a talk page message to inform the user about the promotional username policy and seek clarification.
• Trollyworker: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.37%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Trollyworker' could be misinterpreted as 'troll worker' and appear disruptive or provocative. While not a blatant violation, it is ambiguous and could cause disruption. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the user's intent and suggest a less ambiguous username.
• Islamic-fashion-india: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.31%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Islamic-fashion-india' is potentially promotional as it directly represents a commercial topic or niche market. While not explicitly a company name, it strongly suggests a business or promotional purpose related to Islamic fashion in India. It is advisable to leave a talk page message to the user to inquire about their username and inform them about the username policy, specifically regarding promotional usernames, allowing them an opportunity to clarify or change their username.
• Boogers10: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.71%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Boogers10' is mildly inappropriate as it could be seen as slightly offensive or childish. While not explicitly blockable, a talk page message is recommended to suggest a more appropriate username.
• SweetDee6969: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.53%, Gemini Reason: Username 'SweetDee6969' could be interpreted as suggestive due to the '69' and might be seen as mildly disruptive by some users. While not a blatant violation, a talk page message is recommended to politely ask the user to consider the username's potential connotations and consider a change. Assuming good faith, a direct UAA report is not warranted at this stage.
• ০১৭৭৫৫২২৮১০: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.38%, Gemini Reason: Username resembles a phone number and uses Bengali digits (০১৭). This could be seen as potentially revealing personal information and may cause technical issues with some browsers. Please consider changing your username to one that does not resemble personal information and uses standard Latin script.
• Salebot41: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.34%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Salebot41' could be seen as misleading because it includes 'bot', which might imply it is a bot account when it may not be. While not a definitive violation, usernames that could be easily confused with bot accounts are discouraged. A talk page message requesting clarification and suggesting a username change if it's not a bot account is appropriate.
• Ephraimisweird: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.32%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ephraimisweird' is borderline inappropriate. While 'weird' is not overtly offensive, it could be seen as mildly disparaging or disruptive depending on context and who 'Ephraim' refers to. It's recommended to leave a talk page message politely asking the user to consider if the username could be perceived negatively by others, especially if 'Ephraim' is another person. Assume good faith and allow the user to explain or change the username.
• Mabani for Projects: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.66%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Mabani for Projects' appears to be promotional as it resembles a company or organization name. This violates the username policy against promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the policy and request a username change.
• Suulicensing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.59%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Suulicensing' could be interpreted as promotional, suggesting a company or organization related to licensing. It is not unambiguously promotional, and could be a personal username. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the username and offer guidance on username policy, particularly regarding promotional usernames.
• PLUTOFFPVRPLE!: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.55%, Gemini Reason: Username contains a non-language symbol ('!') which is technically discouraged under the non-script usernames policy. However, it is a minor punctuation mark and unlikely to cause technical issues or disruption. Common sense suggests it is likely acceptable, but informing the user about username policies is advisable.
• Holly Addie at Leeds Uni Library: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.46%, Gemini Reason: Username "Holly Addie at Leeds Uni Library" may be interpreted as implying shared use or being promotional by including an organization name. While it resembles the acceptable example of "Mark at WidgetFactory", it is borderline. A talk page message should be left to inform the user about the username policy regarding promotional and shared usernames and to request clarification or a username change if necessary.
• Birucollective: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.40%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Birucollective' is potentially problematic as it could represent a company, organization, or group name, which violates the promotional usernames and usernames implying shared use policies. It is ambiguous and not clearly promotional, so a talk page message should be left to inquire about the username's intent and inform the user about the relevant username policies.
• Poached cushion yoga: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.09%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Poached cushion yoga' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a business or brand name related to yoga or cushions. While not definitively promotional, it warrants a talk page message to inquire about the user's intent and ensure they understand the username policy, particularly regarding promotional usernames. If the user engages in promotional editing, further action may be needed.
• Jdatabot: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.88%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Jdatabot' may be misleading as it includes 'bot', suggesting it is a bot account. Usernames that could be easily misunderstood to refer to a 'bot' are not permitted unless the account is of that type. Please clarify if this is a bot account or choose a different username.
• TopperBOT: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.49%, Gemini Reason: The username 'TopperBOT' implies the account is a bot, which is a misleading username if the account is not a bot. Please confirm if this is a bot account. If not, the username should be changed to avoid confusion with bot accounts as per the misleading usernames policy.
• Tonyaishappilymarried.thisishusband: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.22%, Gemini Reason: The username is slightly unusual but does not clearly violate the disruptive or offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, shared use, or non-script username policies. A talk page message can be left to inform the user about username policies and to encourage them to consider a more conventional username if they are concerned about potential misinterpretations.
• Xiangyusuperdryers: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.11%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Xiangyusuperdryers' may be promotional as it sounds like a company or product name. Please clarify if this is a personal username or if it represents a company, organization, product, or website. If it is promotional, it violates the username policy. See Wikipedia:Username policy#Promotional usernames for more information.
• Eggberttheautism: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.25%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Eggberttheautism' could be seen as potentially offensive or insensitive towards individuals with autism. While not explicitly profane or hateful, it may be interpreted as mocking or pejorative towards a social group, which can be disruptive or make harmonious editing difficult. A talk page message is recommended to inquire about the user's intent and suggest a username change if necessary.
• Unknown hacker456373: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.60%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Unknown hacker456373' contains the word 'hacker' which could be seen as potentially disruptive or implying a negative intention. While not explicitly offensive, it's advisable to inform the user about the potential perception and suggest considering a different username if they intend to contribute constructively. A talk page message is appropriate to address this ambiguity and guide the user towards a more neutral username.
• JASONKELCEDOPPLEGANGER: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.54%, Gemini Reason: Username uses the name of a famous person (Jason Kelce) and 'DOPPLEGANGER', which could be seen as impersonating or misleading. Recommend a talk page message to clarify intent and advise on username policy regarding impersonation.
• Ecvpodcast: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.96%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Ecvpodcast' could be interpreted as promotional as it may represent a podcast name. It is ambiguous and could also be a personal username. A talk page message is appropriate to ask the user to clarify and ensure they are aware of the promotional username policy.
• Sherri And Patrick: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.81%, Gemini Reason: Username implies shared use, which is against policy. Usernames should represent a single individual, not multiple people. The username 'Sherri And Patrick' suggests the account is used by two people.
• Bdactivists: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.66%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Bdactivists' is ambiguous and could be interpreted in multiple ways. While not overtly offensive or promotional, it is prudent to leave a talk page message to inquire about the intended meaning of 'Bd' and ensure the username aligns with Wikipedia's policies. Further action may be needed based on user response and editing behavior.
• Networks.queries: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.39%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Networks.queries' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use (company/organization name). Please clarify if 'Networks' refers to a company or organization. If so, it violates the username policy. If it's a personal username related to your interests, it might be acceptable.
• Denond trump: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.37%, Gemini Reason: The username "Denond trump" references a highly contentious political figure. While not explicitly offensive, it could be seen as potentially disruptive or intending to provoke strong reactions due to the contentious nature of "trump". A talk page message is recommended to inquire about the username's intent and advise on username policy, particularly regarding contentious names. Further action may be needed depending on user response and editing behavior.
• AbelHazbinHotel: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.19%, Gemini Reason: Username contains the name of a creative work ("Hazbin Hotel") and could be interpreted as promotional. While not unambiguously promotional, it warrants a talk page message to inquire about potential affiliation and inform the user about the promotional username policy.
• Standardfetalmedicino: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.11%, Gemini Reason: Username could be interpreted as promotional, resembling a business name related to "standard fetal medicine". It is recommended to inquire on the user's talk page whether the username represents a company, organization, or product, or if it is intended to indicate a topic of interest. Inform the user about the username policy regarding promotional usernames and the option to change their username if it is deemed promotional.
• Dashmesh sourcing: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.08%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Dashmesh sourcing' is ambiguous. 'Dashmesh' is a religious term referring to Guru Gobind Singh, and 'sourcing' is related to Wikipedia editing. While not clearly promotional, it could be misinterpreted as representing a religious organization focused on information sourcing. A talk page message is recommended to inquire about the user's intent and ensure it is not promotional or misleading. Monitor edits for promotional activity.
• CJ Photography9: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'CJ Photography9' could be interpreted as promotional, potentially representing a photography business or service. While not unambiguously promotional, it is advisable to leave a talk page message to inform the user about the username policy regarding promotional usernames and to request clarification or a username change if it represents a business or brand.
• BuntyPatel69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.50%, Gemini Reason: Username contains '69' which is sexually suggestive and could be considered mildly offensive or disruptive. While not explicitly violating policy requiring immediate block, it is advisable to inform the user about potential issues and ask them to consider changing it.
• MR. MYSTERY SAYS SPEND MONEY AT THE MYSTERY SHACK: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.23%, Gemini Reason: The username "MR. MYSTERY SAYS SPEND MONEY AT THE MYSTERY SHACK" could be interpreted as promotional due to the phrase "SPEND MONEY AT THE MYSTERY SHACK", which is a call to action related to "THE MYSTERY SHACK". While "THE MYSTERY SHACK" is fictional, usernames promoting even fictional entities can be seen as borderline promotional. A talk page message should be left to clarify the user's intent and inform them about the promotional username policy.
• M.i.king.photography: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.03%, Gemini Reason: The username 'M.i.king.photography' may violate the promotional username policy as it could be interpreted as representing a photography business or service. While not overtly promotional, it has elements that could be seen as promoting a service. A talk page message should be left to inquire about the username's intent and suggest a username change if it is indeed promotional.
• 中嶋優月応援アカウント: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.86%, Gemini Reason: The username "中嶋優月応援アカウント" (Nakajima Yuzuki Ouendan Account) translates to "Nakajima Yuzuki Support Account". While it contains a person's name and "account", it is ambiguous whether it represents a company, organization, or a fan account. It could be seen as promotional if it represents an official support organization. A talk page message is recommended to clarify the user's intent and ensure it's not intended for promotional purposes or representing a group rather than an individual. If it is a personal fan account, it is likely acceptable, similar to "FacebookFanatic87" example. If it represents an organization, a username change might be needed.
• EqFedComms: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.48%, Gemini Reason: Username 'EqFedComms' could be interpreted as promotional or implying shared use by representing an organization or group related to 'Equipment', 'Federal', 'Communications'. Please clarify if this username represents an organization. If so, it may violate the username policy against promotional usernames or usernames implying shared use. If it is a personal username, no action is needed.

• Zane eats toes: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.73%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Zane eats toes' is unusual and may be considered slightly immature or silly, but it does not clearly violate the disruptive or offensive usernames policy. It is not profane, sexually explicit, violent, threatening, or explicitly offensive to any group. While potentially mildly off-putting to some, it is not likely to cause significant disruption or prevent harmonious editing. Using common sense and assuming good faith, the username does not warrant action based on current policy.
• HASSAN BAKHIT DJAMOUS: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'HASSAN BAKHIT DJAMOUS' appears to be a personal name and does not violate any of the listed inappropriate username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and it uses standard script characters.
• Vermadikshit8: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.60%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Vermadikshit8' does not violate the username policy. It appears to be a personal name and does not fall under any categories of inappropriate usernames, such as being offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It also does not contain non-script characters.
• Gfdisjkglchyergfrufdvfgfrheugdfgfdgfdghduhbfhdfyughfr: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.55%, Gemini Reason: The username appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It also uses only allowed characters.
• Aase Funding: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.52%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Aase Funding' is not clearly violating the username policy. While 'Funding' could potentially be associated with a company or organization, 'Aase' appears to be a personal name, making the username ambiguous rather than unambiguously promotional, offensive, disruptive, misleading, or implying shared use. Assuming good faith, the username does not warrant action based solely on the username policy.
• BOBTHEEDITORCANHEEDITITBOBTHEEDITORYESHECAN: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.43%, Gemini Reason: The username does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or a non-script username. While lengthy and repetitive, it does not fall under any prohibited categories.
• Holaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa A124678992789999928299999928779: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.43%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Holaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa A124678992789999992829999928779' is lengthy and contains repetitive characters and numbers, but it does not clearly violate any of the listed inappropriate username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, nor does it contain non-script characters. While unusual, it does not appear to be intended for disruption or violate core username policies.
• SussyBakaSussySo: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.43%, Gemini Reason: Username uses internet slang ('sussy baka') which might be seen as immature but does not clearly violate username policy as it is not overtly offensive, disruptive, or misleading. No immediate action needed.
• BigBaller55555: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.41%, Gemini Reason: The username 'BigBaller55555' does not clearly violate the username policy. While potentially boastful, it is not profane, offensive, threatening, sexually explicit, libelous, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. It does not fall under any category requiring action based on the provided policy.
• Ffchghgyrfytrfghji76yftghjkirythh: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.41%, Gemini Reason: The username is a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed policies regarding inappropriate usernames. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and uses standard script characters.
• Hbhgvvjkgvjhvjhvjkgjgchvjqqqqq: DeBERTA Risk Score: 99.32%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Hbhgvvjkgvjhvjhvjkgjgchvjqqqqq' appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, imply shared use, or contain non-script characters. It appears to be policy compliant.
• IUCNStatusBot: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.99%, Gemini Reason: The username 'IUCNStatusBot' is not clearly in violation of the username policy. While it contains 'Bot', which could be misleading if it were not a bot account, it is plausible that this is intended to be a bot account related to IUCN status. Assuming good faith, the username itself is not offensive, disruptive, promotional, or libelous. Monitoring the account's edits would be a reasonable next step to determine if it operates as a bot and adheres to bot policies.
• Xdxdxdxdxdzxzxzx: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.91%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Xdxdxdxdxdzxzxzx' is a seemingly random string of characters. It does not appear to violate any of the username policy criteria related to being offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It contains only standard English letters and does not resemble any prohibited elements like profanity, personal attacks, company names, or non-script characters. It is likely policy compliant.
• Lebronisdagoat23: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.86%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Lebronisdagoat23' is a fan username referencing LeBron James and using common sports terminology ('GOAT'). It does not violate the disruptive, offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, shared use, or non-script username policies. While it references a famous person, it is not impersonation and is a common type of username. Assume good faith.
• Bigboytdobbyyurrr: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.78%, Gemini Reason: Username 'Bigboytdobbyyurrr' does not clearly violate the username policy. It is not offensive, threatening, libelous, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, nor does it contain non-script characters. While slightly unusual, it does not appear to be disruptive or problematic enough to warrant action based on the provided policy.
• VeahIsSilly69: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.77%, Gemini Reason: The username 'VeahIsSilly69' is not clearly offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or non-script. While '69' can have sexual connotations, in the context of 'VeahIsSilly', it is unlikely to be interpreted as explicitly disruptive or offensive. Applying common sense and assuming good faith, the username does not appear to violate the username policy.
• Zurichturb: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.66%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Zurichturb' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. While 'Zurichturb' could potentially be a company name, it is not unambiguously so and appears to be a combination of 'Zurich' (a city) and 'turb'.
• Duijdbs uhicvasdb chuoasdbcyuasdvnio: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.61%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Duijdbs uhicvasdb chuoasdbcyuasdvnio' appears to be a randomly generated string of characters and does not violate any explicit categories of inappropriate usernames as defined in the provided policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. While unusual, it does not inherently disrupt Wikipedia's processes or violate policy.
• Rikshit Valecha: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.51%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Rikshit Valecha' does not violate the username policy. It appears to be a personal name and does not fall under any categories of inappropriate usernames listed in the policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use.
• LEADER OF THE Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.48%, Gemini Reason: The username 'LEADER OF THE Royal Order of the Holy Mackerel' is unusual but does not clearly violate the username policy. While 'LEADER OF THE Royal Order' might vaguely suggest authority or shared use, the addition of 'of the Holy Mackerel' makes the username sound humorous and less like a serious attempt to mislead or be disruptive. It is not profane, offensive, promotional, or impersonating. Assuming good faith, it is likely intended to be a quirky or humorous username and does not warrant action based on the provided policy.
• Jrj oi34 f ;ij f: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.44%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Jrj oi34 f ;ij f' does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is a combination of letters, numbers, spaces, and a semicolon, none of which are explicitly prohibited and do not fall under the categories of disruptive, offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It does not contain non-script characters that are disallowed.
• Iamasigmaligmaboibecauseilikecheese: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.31%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Iamasigmaligmaboibecauseilikecheese' is unusual and lengthy but does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. While 'ligma' is an internet meme, in this context, it does not appear to be intended to be disruptive or offensive, especially when combined with the nonsensical and benign phrases 'sigma,' 'boibecause,' and 'ilikecheese.' The username, while unconventional, does not clearly fall under any category requiring action based on the provided policy guidelines.
• Toilet scrole: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.27%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Toilet scrole' is silly and slightly immature, but it does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or using non-script characters. While unprofessional, it does not meet the threshold for disruptive or offensive usernames that require immediate action.
• Sillywillycatmeowmeow: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.23%, Gemini Reason: Username does not violate the username policy. It is a playful and whimsical username but not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use.
• CIA is my best friend: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.08%, Gemini Reason: The username 'CIA is my best friend' is unusual but does not clearly violate any specific policy. It is not overtly offensive, promotional, misleading, or implying shared use in a way that is prohibited by the username policy. While 'CIA' refers to an organization, the phrase 'is my best friend' personalizes it and avoids the impression of representing the CIA or promoting it commercially. Applying common sense, it's not a disruptive or problematic username that requires immediate action.
• Ilikemygirlfriend: DeBERTA Risk Score: 98.04%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Ilikemygirlfriend' does not violate the username policy. It is a personal statement and is not considered offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or implying shared use. It does not contain profanities, personal attacks, or any other elements prohibited by the policy.
• Xingkonggggggggggg: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.96%, Gemini Reason: Username is policy compliant. 'Xingkong' is a Chinese word meaning 'starry sky'. Repeated 'g's are not policy violating.
• Boi ts is tuff: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.94%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Boi ts is tuff' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. While informal, it does not contain profanities, threats, personal attacks, or any other elements that warrant action according to the policy.
• PoofyPaws002: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.86%, Gemini Reason: The username 'PoofyPaws002' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. It also does not contain non-script characters. It appears to be a benign and acceptable username.
• Yoooooouuuiuolh,bjvkutckghjv: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.84%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Yoooooouuuiuolh,bjvkutckghjv' is lengthy and unusual, but it does not clearly violate any of the listed inappropriate username policies. It is not profane, offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. While unconventional, it does not appear to be intentionally disruptive or designed to cause harm or offense. The comma is a standard punctuation mark and not a prohibited non-language symbol in usernames. Therefore, no action is warranted based on the username policy.
• Useridghfsdiufbgnsdufovhisnbu: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.75%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Useridghfsdiufbgnsdufovhisnbu' is a long string of seemingly random characters. It does not violate any specific username policy as it is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It also does not contain non-script characters. It appears to be a neutral, albeit unusual, username and does not trigger any immediate policy violations.
• Annegrettorspecken: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.59%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Annegrettorspecken' does not violate the username policy. It does not contain profanities, personal attacks, promotional content, misleading terms, or non-script characters. It appears to be a personal username and does not fall under any category of inappropriate usernames as defined in the policy.
• Dedsjcnhdvyuwrshknc nvfdusvhgs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.55%, Gemini Reason: The username appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate any specific criteria of the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use.
• Kskldkviikisocklkadkxkisl: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.51%, Gemini Reason: The username appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate any explicitly stated policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use.
• ᱡᱤᱨᱤᱦᱤᱨᱤ ᱢᱟᱱᱰᱤ: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.44%, Gemini Reason: Username is in Ol Chiki script, a recognized writing system, and does not violate any other username policies. It does not appear to be offensive, misleading, promotional, or imply shared use.
• Rsiouohrfsoehfshgolshlg: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.41%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Rsiouohrfsoehfshgolshlg' appears to be a random string of characters. It does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or imply shared use, and does not contain non-script characters. It appears to be a permissible username.
• Bhwoefbwjfbwkoefbjweof: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.37%, Gemini Reason: Username appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It also doesn't seem to be a non-script username issue.
• Xxx antifascista xxX: DeBERTA Risk Score: 97.05%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Xxx antifascista xxX' expresses a political stance but is not inherently offensive, profane, or directly attacking any protected group as defined in the disruptive usernames policy. While potentially contentious for some, it does not clearly violate the policy requiring immediate action. It is not a racial slur, personal attack, or hate speech. Monitoring the user's edits is recommended, but no action is needed based solely on the username itself.
• KanyeKendrickJpegAREGOATS: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.81%, Gemini Reason: The username 'KanyeKendrickJpegAREGOATS' appears to be a fan username referencing musicians Kanye West and Kendrick Lamar, using internet slang ('GOAT'). It does not violate any of the inappropriate username categories. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use.
• Hola caracola y tu padre: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.61%, Gemini Reason: The username "Hola caracola y tu padre" (Hello snail and your father) is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It does not violate any of the listed prohibited username categories in the policy. It is a colloquial phrase and does not contain profanity, personal attacks, or any other elements that would warrant action.
• Hwhfvrwhirwhuwuifheww: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.56%, Gemini Reason: Username is a random string of characters and does not violate any username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use.
• Superman12hcdabjkkjhvagsbfa,kbfjsx: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.55%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Superman12hcdabjkkjhvagsbfa,kbfjsx' is lengthy and somewhat unusual due to the random characters, but it does not violate the username policy. While 'Superman' refers to a fictional character, it is not considered impersonation in a disruptive way, especially with the addition of numbers and random characters. The comma is a standard punctuation mark and not a prohibited non-script character in this context. The username is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It does not fall under any category requiring action based on the provided policy.
• Cartitcuidyugkgyudwvayukg: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.47%, Gemini Reason: Username is a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and it is a script username.
• Fce odniehib2dzddihbd2fkbh: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.46%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Fce odniehib2dzddihbd2fkbh' appears to be a random string of characters and does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or imply shared use. It uses only alphanumeric characters.
• あーーーーーーーちゃん: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.42%, Gemini Reason: The username consists of Japanese characters and hyphens. While the hyphens are excessive, it is not explicitly prohibited by the username policy. It does not appear to be disruptive, offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, or a non-script username violating the relevant section. Assuming good faith, it is likely intended as a username in Japanese with emphasis and not designed to be disruptive.
• THISISANAWSOMEUSERNAME123: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.39%, Gemini Reason: The username 'THISISANAWSOMEUSERNAME123' is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It is a descriptive username that, while slightly boastful, does not violate any of the listed username policies.
• 6sgs98easg12eizdbawe12e: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.27%, Gemini Reason: The username is a random string of characters and does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and uses standard script.
• U9un9u98nu9u98u: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.16%, Gemini Reason: Username is a seemingly random string of alphanumeric characters and does not obviously violate any username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. While unusual, it is not explicitly prohibited by policy.
• Juan123988303589247283920: DeBERTA Risk Score: 96.12%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Juan123988303589247283920' does not violate the username policy. It is a common name followed by a string of numbers, which, while lengthy, does not fall under any category of inappropriate usernames. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or imply shared use, nor does it contain non-script characters. Assuming good faith, the numbers are likely for uniqueness and do not inherently cause any policy violation.
• Blartipus thumpdooker: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.87%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Blartipus thumpdooker' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It appears to be a whimsical or nonsensical username, which is permissible.
• INEEDTORETURNSOMEVIDEOTAPES: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.78%, Gemini Reason: The username 'INEEDTORETURNSOMEVIDEOTAPES' is a quote from the movie American Psycho. While the movie has dark themes, the username itself is not inherently offensive, profane, violent, threatening, sexually explicit, libelous, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. It does not directly violate any of the listed inappropriate username categories in the policy. Using common sense and assuming good faith, the username is unusual but not disruptive or offensive in the context of Wikipedia username policy.
• 看见哈哈哈哈哈哈哈嗝: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.78%, Gemini Reason: The username "看见哈哈哈哈哈哈哈嗝" translates from Chinese to "See hahahahahahahahiccup". This username does not violate any of the inappropriate username policies as it is not offensive, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or a non-script username. It appears to be a benign and whimsical username.
• DUCKMAZDA21: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.68%, Gemini Reason: The username 'DUCKMAZDA21' does not clearly violate the username policy. While it contains 'MAZDA', which is a company name, the addition of 'DUCK' and '21' makes it less unambiguously promotional and more likely a personal username that incorporates a brand name. It is not offensive, misleading, or implying shared use in a way that clearly violates policy. Common sense and assuming good faith suggest this username is acceptable unless the user engages in promotional editing.
• Alvinehyuer8yrf8y7er9: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.34%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Alvinehyuer8yrf8y7er9' does not violate the username policy. It is a combination of letters and numbers and does not fall under disruptive, offensive, misleading, promotional, shared use, or non-script username categories.
• Iloveeatinglotsoftacosandbananas12345: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.27%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Iloveeatinglotsoftacosandbananas12345' does not violate the username policy. It is a whimsical username about food preferences and does not fall under any category of inappropriate usernames such as offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It uses standard English characters and numbers.
• PetScanListBot: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.22%, Gemini Reason: The username 'PetScanListBot' suggests it is a bot account, which is permissible. Unless there is evidence to the contrary, such as human-like editing, the username is not considered a violation. Assume good faith that it is intended for bot use.
• 1hiuv3u13u9h245g: DeBERTA Risk Score: 95.02%, Gemini Reason: Username is a random alphanumeric string and does not violate any of the listed inappropriate username categories. It is not offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or non-script. It does not resemble an IP address strongly enough to be considered misleading in that way.
• MyChemicalDestructionJadow: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.82%, Gemini Reason: Username does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or implying shared use. 'Destruction' might be slightly negative but not inherently problematic.
• ⵎⴰⵔⵡⴰⵏ ⴰⴱⴰⵄⵇⵉⵍ: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.75%, Gemini Reason: The username is in the Tifinagh script, which is a valid writing system for Berber languages. While the policy disallows usernames with 'non-language symbols', this is interpreted to target emojis, decorative symbols, and characters not part of any writing system, not entire scripts like Tifinagh. The username itself does not appear to be offensive, promotional, misleading, or otherwise violating username policies. Assuming good faith, this username should be considered acceptable.
• Nhufgjyredvhjiijhgtgmfv: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.69%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Nhufgjyredvhjiijhgtgmfv' appears to be a randomly generated string of characters. It does not violate any of the listed username policies regarding offensive, misleading, promotional, or shared use usernames, nor does it contain non-script characters. It appears to be policy compliant.
• Nosreppersonnoses: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.58%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Nosreppersonnoses' does not clearly violate the username policy. It is not obviously offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or implying shared use. While unusual, it doesn't contain profanities, personal attacks, or other prohibited elements. Assuming good faith, it appears to be a non-problematic, albeit strange, username.
• SHADOWTHEHEDGEHOGBUTIMFAT: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.33%, Gemini Reason: The username 'SHADOWTHEHEDGEHOGBUTIMFAT' is not clearly disruptive or offensive. While 'fat' could be considered mildly negative, in this context it appears to be self-deprecating or humorous rather than intended to offend or disrupt. It does not violate any other username policy criteria such as being promotional, misleading, or containing personal information. Using common sense and assuming good faith, no action is necessary.
• Manikhatewiki: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.33%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Manikhatewiki' does not appear to violate the username policy. It is not obviously offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. 'Manikhate' does not seem to be a readily identifiable company or organization name and could be a personal name. The 'wiki' suffix is common and acceptable. Assuming good faith, the username is likely compliant.
• My cremated ashes: DeBERTA Risk Score: 94.06%, Gemini Reason: The username 'My cremated ashes' is unusual and may be considered morbid by some, but it does not clearly violate the disruptive or offensive username policy. It does not contain profanities, slurs, threats, advocate violence, or target any protected group. While potentially causing mild discomfort to some, it is not explicitly offensive or disruptive enough for immediate action according to policy. Common sense and assuming good faith suggest monitoring the account's edits rather than taking immediate action based solely on the username.
• ⵏⵓⵎⵉⴷⵢⴰⵏ: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.94%, Gemini Reason: The username 'ⵏⵓⵎᱤⴷⵢⴰⵏ' uses characters from the Tifinagh script, which is a recognized writing system. While not commonly used in English Wikipedia, it doesn't violate the non-script username policy as it is not emoji, emoticon, decorative, or unrelated to a writing system. The username is not offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use based on available information and policy guidelines.
• Happyblackhistorymonth: DeBERTA Risk Score: 93.74%, Gemini Reason: The username "Happyblackhistorymonth" does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It appears to be a celebratory phrase related to Black History Month, which is not considered a contentious or inappropriate topic. Common sense suggests it is not problematic.
• Goldenleafshdhfsgdhs: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.69%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Goldenleafshdhfsgdhs' is a string of letters and does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and it uses standard script characters. It appears to be a random name and does not trigger any policy violations.
• JAmes123 vsjk de456789: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.57%, Gemini Reason: The username 'JAmes123 vsjk de456789' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or non-script. It appears to be a combination of a common name part and a random string, but it does not fall under any prohibited categories outlined in the policy.
• Nazirmohammadi: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.51%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Nazirmohammadi' does not violate the username policy. It appears to be a personal name and is not disruptive, offensive, misleading, promotional, imply shared use, or contain non-script characters.
• Isaacnewschool: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.43%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Isaacnewschool' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. It appears to be a personal username and does not fall under any of the prohibited categories.
• OKSANA GAMES: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.40%, Gemini Reason: The username 'OKSANA GAMES' is not clearly in violation of the username policy. While 'GAMES' could be interpreted as related to a product or company, 'OKSANA' appears to be a personal name, making the username ambiguous and potentially acceptable as a personal username that includes an interest. It is not unambiguously promotional, offensive, disruptive, misleading, or implying shared use. Assuming good faith, 'nothing' is the appropriate action.
• OOGLYBOOGLYBYcandt: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.32%, Gemini Reason: Username does not violate the username policy. It is unusual but not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. Applying common sense and assuming good faith, no policy violation is apparent.
• Fufumucha2: DeBERTA Risk Score: 92.09%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Fufumucha2' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, libelous, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or non-script. It appears to be a personal username and does not trigger any policy violations.
• HELLLOOOJIROOO: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.90%, Gemini Reason: The username 'HELLLOOOJIROOO' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. While slightly unusual, it does not fall into any of the prohibited categories.
• Syrische Protestanten: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.62%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Syrische Protestanten' (Syrian Protestants) is descriptive and does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use. It appears to be a user identifying with or interested in this group, which is permissible.
• Luciano cline cats 1223456: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.42%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Luciano cline cats 1223456' does not appear to violate the username policy. It is not obviously offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use. While 'cline cats' could be interpreted as a group name, it is not unambiguous and the inclusion of 'Luciano' and numbers suggests a personal username. Applying common sense and assuming good faith, no action is necessary.
• Pinkballetslippers: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.40%, Gemini Reason: The username "Pinkballetslippers" is not offensive, disruptive, misleading, promotional, implying shared use, or non-script. It is a descriptive but innocuous username and does not violate any of the listed Wikipedia username policies.
• Lowtaperfade073nonchaboy: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.09%, Gemini Reason: Username does not appear to violate username policy. While 'nonchaboy' could be very loosely interpreted as having a potentially negative connotation depending on specific interpretations of 'noncha' and 'cho', this is not a clear or obvious violation. Assuming good faith, the username is likely just unusual rather than intentionally offensive, disruptive, promotional, or misleading.
• MOOKIEesteCUTIE: DeBERTA Risk Score: 91.06%, Gemini Reason: The username 'MOOKIEesteCUTIE' does not appear to violate the username policy. While 'MOOKIE' can sometimes have negative connotations, in combination with 'esteCUTIE', it does not appear to be blatantly offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or imply shared use. It seems like a personal username that does not violate any specific policy points. Use common sense and assume good faith.
• Flopflipfloploquesuenacuandoando: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.99%, Gemini Reason: The username 'Flopflipfloploquesuenacuandoando' does not violate the username policy. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or indicative of shared use, nor does it contain non-script characters. While unusual, it appears to be a nonsensical username and does not fall under any category requiring action.
• Uybhdbhufewduhbfewrhbu: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.74%, Gemini Reason: The username is a random string of characters and does not violate any of the listed username policies. It is not offensive, misleading, promotional, or implying shared use, and it uses standard script characters. It appears to be policy compliant.
• BIGGER cheese 32323: DeBERTA Risk Score: 90.01%, Gemini Reason: The username 'BIGGER cheese 32323' is not clearly violative of the username policy. While 'bigger cheese' is an idiom that might suggest importance, it is not inherently offensive, promotional, or misleading in the context of Wikipedia usernames. The addition of numbers '32323' further diminishes any potential promotional or misleading interpretations. It does not fall under disruptive, offensive, libelous, misleading, promotional, shared use, or non-script username categories that require action based solely on the username itself. Common sense and assuming good faith suggest this username is acceptable unless the user's editing behavior indicates otherwise.