The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 07:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

• ... that Kit Nascimento, spokesperson for the government of Guyana during the aftermath of Jonestown, disagrees with current proposals to open the former Jonestown site as a tourist attraction?

• Reviewed:

Spiralwidget (talk) 17:07, 10 January 2025 (UTC).

• Long enough, created on the day it was nominated, Earwig finds no issues. Tone is neutral and sources seem overall high-quality. Hook is well-sourced - source is primary but since the hook is about his opinions that seems unobjectionable; "spokesperson" is sourced elsewhere. Hook is interesting, though almost all the interest lie in the existence of the proposals in the first place rather than Nascimento's objection to them. I'd write "that Kit Nascimento, spokesperson for the government of Guyana after the Jonestown massacre, opposes proposals to turn the former Jonestown site into a tourist attraction?", but that's a quibble. Rusalkii (talk) 04:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)