Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

Talk:Philippines

Good articlePhilippines has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 1, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
November 4, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 2, 2008Peer reviewNot reviewed
August 18, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
March 11, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
June 5, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 4, 2014Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 22, 2021Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 16, 2023Guild of Copy EditorsCopyedited
July 28, 2023Peer reviewReviewed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on May 7, 2020.
Current status: Good article

Remove the part where it said Deforestation reached a record high during the Duterte administration in 2017 because of wrong citation

In the "Biodiversity" portion of this article, it's stated that "Deforestation had reached a record high during the Duterte administration in 2017", with citation 237 entitled, "7M hectares Philippine lands are forested-and that's bad news" by the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism on May 12, 2021. I read through that article and the only specific period mentioned was in the portion "Mindoro lost more than 200,000 hectares of forest cover from 2003 to 2015. However, Duterte was elected into office on June 30, 2016. His predecessors, Benigno S. Aquino III (June 30, 2010 to June 30, 2016) and Gloria Macapagal Arroyo (January 20, 2001 to June 30, 2010 were in office during the time period mentioned in the citation. The statement is clearly false if the basis is the citation used and should be changed/removed. Chiniwaki (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This seems to have been removed already. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Hispanized Southeast Asia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 27 § Hispanized Southeast Asia until a consensus is reached. ★Trekker (talk) 10:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Area section removed from infobox

Whatever dispute might exist regarding the size of the country, I think removing it altogether without first discussing on the talk page seems drastic. - Bokmanrocks01 (talk) 00:25, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be best to notify WP:Tambayan Philippines about this recurring issue. Sanglahi86 (talk) 11:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All the values I've seen vary around 300,000, it seems fine as a rough approximation and appears to readers as a rough approximation. A lot is likely methodology, given the archipelagic nature of the country. CMD (talk) 11:53, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Update. The offending editor has been blocked as a sock: See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RussianFanboy2010. Borgenland (talk) 02:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copra

This page says the Philippines is a major 'importer' of copra. Surely this is incorrect, with coconut palms being ubiquitous throughout the country. 112.209.186.83 (talk) 13:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with the details. The OEC World says the Philippines exports copra, but also says the country is the "1st largest importer of Copra in the world". Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:34, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article length

At 478kb and 11,355 words this article is well into WP:SIZESPLIT territory. Mathglot (talk) 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We already shortened this article before, in order to prime this article into a Good Article Review. New edits bloated it once again. @Sanglahi86 looks like we have to trim this article once more. Also, the article is not bloated due to content but due to the fact that it has such a large number of references.--Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 03:38, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have not been active recently in Wikipedia as I have in the past months began concentrating on improving categories of images in Commons. Indeed as @Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr.: had mentioned, the article is not bloated. I have removed the maintenance tag as it is inapplicable; reference size is excluded in the size rule, and the current prose size is only 62 kB (9348 words). Sanglahi86 (talk) 19:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You for explaining the context for our friend @Mathglot: dear brother @Sanglahi86:. :D --Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 13:05, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]