This  level-4 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Social and political / Continental Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics Social and political philosophy Continental philosophy Literature Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Spoken Wikipedia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia Anthropology: Oral tradition This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

This section seems superfluous? Literary criticism is a huge academic discipline (or its popular version in book reviews but that’s a very different thing) and the opinion of only two authors, even as ‘big’ as Joyce, doesn’t really matter to an understanding of it. It’s like having a page on ‘physics’ with a huge section on ‘criticism of physics’ and then only two unconnected names. Pharalope45 (talk) 09:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I believe it should be removed, and Eagleton’s views aren’t even criticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:4111:6F56:6969:3736 (talk) 03:04, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]