This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Sure, they would put the congressman in the back row while other congressmen would be on the front row. The group picture was used in other 9 congressmen articles. Why the official photo would list the names in this order? The most important part of his long career was as a representative, but nothing is written on it. He wrote to me that he was most proud of his civil rights legislation. Ucla90024 (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure what the point is. The caption does not give Left-to-Rights, and it (as I remember) does not give the name of the military officer at all. Without knowing exactly which person is Mr. Corman, I am sure you will agree that the photo should not be used. I side with you about the need for more info on his Congressional career and would welcome anybody's improving that section. Yours sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 23:09, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
