This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Come on...you can't tease us with the "Did you know?" section regarding the 10 inch phallus and not show us a picture of it on the main page. The Ejaculation article actually shows a guy shooting his load and the vagina article actually shows a real (perhaps under age) vagina spread open so I don't think that showing the picture of the phallus would be in poor taste. Frankly, I can't stop giggling at the fact that women go there to have a large penis slapped on their forehead. I don't think it helps as I've seen many videos on the web where guys do that with their real penis and the girls seem never to get pregnant...lol.
There are many porn sites on the Web where those who get sophomoric giggle-fits over seeing penises on their computers can indulge themselves. Quite aside from that the monks at this monastery might not be enthusiastic about flash photography of their religious rituals, they very likely take them seriously, and don't choose to display them in front of infantile mockers. Ravenswing 23:56, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]