This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
@springee deleted the section Nato. I find the argument wrong. Voting against Sweden and Finnland as a member of NATO is a significant vote and important information about Biggs’s political views. I would support to add it again FantinoFalco (talk) 04:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The issue is weight. We need two things to include this. First, it needs to be clearly part of a larger narrative. As inserted this comes off as a random factoid that an editor felt was important but isn't something that really is about Biggs himself. That gets to the second issue, NPOV/WEIGHT says that we need sources to say why this vote is significant in context of Biggs, not why the vote itself was significant. Earlier this year I opened a NPOVN discussion on the topic of when it's due to include how a politician voted on a bill. My read of that discussion is a clear consensus that we need articles talking about the BLP subject in ways other than just saying they voted for/against a particular bill.[1]Springee (talk) 12:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Editorializing
I might be able to support wikipedia if the editorializing could stop. Just say, "Andy Biggs claimed." I do not need "Andy Boggs falsely claimed." Just the facts please!!! 2603:6080:4A09:C700:3068:F361:C44B:5CD4 (talk) 18:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For this to be editorializing, that would require "Joe Biden is the elected president of the united states" to not be a fact.
But deciding that that is not a fact, is editorializing.
Good luck with that. It's what these shill supermoderators at Wikipedia do, especially Weller. 107.4.151.163 (talk) 03:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
X
Diese Website benutzt Cookies. Wenn du die Website weiter nutzt, gehe Ich von Deinem Einverständnis aus.OKNeinDatenschutzerklärung