Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk · contribs) 09:11, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Spookyaki (talk · contribs) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Copyvio looks good. No pictures to check. Sources are all sufficiently high-quality. Made a few minor tweaks myself. Some notes (do let me know if I am contradicting Zambian English conventions. I am not really familiar):

Zambia has one of the most permissive abortion laws in Africa, though its restrictions limit access. — This is referring to the TOP act? Or the general field of abortion law in Zambia? Please clarify in the article. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

Some critics of Zambia's abortion law believe that its restrictions are barriers to access for most Zambians. — Same as above. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Specified that this refers to the TOP Act in lead and body. Did not change the mention in the first paragraph since the second paragraph clarifies it better. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

...but has lower requirements for evidence. — Evidence of what? Please clarify in the article. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to ...but has lower requirements for the approval of health workers. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

...and that the movement restricting abortion is much larger. — Larger than what? Please clarify in the article. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to ...and that many more people work to restrict abortion access than to increase it. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

...only considering public health facilities if it went wrong. — What is "it"? Please clarify in the article. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changed. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

Overall, the writing on this article is excellent. Will begin the spot check shortly. Spookyaki (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you quote the sections (here on the review page) supporting the following claims?:

As of 2013, 88 public facilities provide abortions. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally left out the citation for that one; it's the source by Parmar et al. Fixed. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC) Y[reply]

The average cost of an abortion at UTH is 283 kwacha, or US$52.6, as of 2013. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Table on page 830 Y

This ratio is significantly higher than Africa's average. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page 3: For sub-Saharan Africa its estimated that 9.6% of maternal deaths are caused by unsafe abortion (Say et al., 2014). Its contribution in Zambia seems to be far greater. Y

Deaths in the antepartum period comprise 31.2% of maternal deaths. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Page 107: [...] the consequences of limiting access to abortion are commonplace: the 31.2% of Zambian maternal mortality occurring in the antepartum period which includes abortion is broadly consistent with other countries in the region (Merdad and Ali, 2018). Y

I think the article would also benefit from including sfn citations with page numbers for the journals, but this is not required for GA. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, great work! I think this article s almost ready to go. Spookyaki (talk) 23:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Spookyaki: I think I've addressed everything. — Vigilant Cosmic Penguin 🐧 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good. going to go ahead and pass this. Thank you again for your excellent work! Spookyaki (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]