This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography Futures studies This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Futures studies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Futures studies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Futures studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Futures studiesTemplate:WikiProject Futures studiesfutures studies Systems This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems This draft is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page. Sociology This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Politics This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics

I am still struggling to identify secondary sources in order to validate a notable person entry.

Dr. Kent is considered a legend within the UN community for decades of pioneering work in the field, and that seems somewhat evident in the positions he has held, but I am struggling to find what might be considered acceptable validation through secondary sources.

I understood that elected titles / association within reputed academic bodies should suffice, but perhaps the citations provided do not directly reference the subject's awards per se - or are they themselves inadequate?

For example, would being a Senior Associate Fellow at the Royal United Services Institute not be an adequate reference of notability https://www.rusi.org/people/kent) or any of the other academic bodies referenced?

What am I missing? How might one reasonably validate a person as notable who is not necessarily high profile or in the media. Nik9t (talk) 23:15, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have added numerous citations and references and have resubmitted, whilst continuing to look for any further guidance and appropriate sources Nik9t (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]