Eisspeedway

Back YobolAdelle Davis • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Adelle Davis (Log · Page History)
User Yobol (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 99
Minor edits 4 (4%)
(Semi-)automated edits 4 (4%)
Reverted edits 1 (1%)
atbe1 24.9
Added (bytes)2 12,088
Deleted (bytes) -14,862
Minor edits · 4 (4%)
Major edits · 95 (96%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 4 (4%)
Manual edits · 95 (96%)
Reverted edits · 1 (1%)
Unreverted edits · 98 (99%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
Diff · History -163 does not appear to be supported by the body of the article, per WP:LEAD
Diff · History -1,370 no indication from source that these are "most known" or anything other than a random collection
Diff · History -940 quality, not quanitity; i'll take it RSN
Diff · History -820 not reliable; 1) Morton Walker is not "some doctors" (at most one doctor); 2) Morton Walker is a podiatrist, not a MD or DO; 3) book appears to be promoting quack DMSO as a cure
Diff · History 21 Modern influence and critics:
Diff · History -2 move to lower section, where it appears more appropriate
Diff · History -8 Social concerns about nutrition: appears to be a historian
Diff · History -378 Career as nutritionist and author: trim a bit, to see if that helps
Diff · History 1,215 Undid revision 782097216 by Light show (talk) how is the reception of her books not relevant to her biography?
Diff · History -435 Social concerns about nutrition: remove plagiarism
Diff · History 4 Career as nutritionist and author:
Diff · History -1 Career as nutritionist and author:
Diff · History 1 Career as nutritionist and author:
Diff · History -1 Career as nutritionist and author:
Diff · History 1,212 Career as nutritionist and author: add book reviews from medical literature
Diff · History 7 Social concerns about nutrition: attribute
Diff · History 0 Modern influence and critics: re do order
Diff · History 1,388 happy to discuss, but it has been in the article for over 5 years and has consensus, please get consensus to remove
Diff · History -532 Modern influence and critics: again, this is not the dumping ground for everyone who has ever had an opinion about davis
Diff · History -151 Modern influence and critics: pretty sure more than "some" nutritionists dispute that divorce is caused by poor diet
Diff · History 1,388 Noting lawsuits also notes that she was sued for her nutritional advice that caused lasting harm
Diff · History -413 doesn't belong in lead
Diff · History -1 Career as nutritionist and author:
Diff · History 28 Career as nutritionist and author: she's not alive
Diff · History 413 Undid revision 782070014 by Yobol (talk)
Diff · History -413 (reverted)  not a summary of her book (which has thousands of recommendations) but a cherry picked list
Diff · History 1 move to separate paragraph
Diff · History -15 top: lets tone it down
Diff · History -81 Honors and awards: non-notable "college"
Diff · History 5 Modern influence and critics: better
Diff · History -504 Modern influence and critics: green bay gazette, eh?
Diff · History -293 Modern influence and critics: no, we're not going to pretend changing diet will cure asthma
Diff · History -432 Modern influence and critics: why is this notable? This isn't a dumping ground for anyone who has ever had an opinion about davis
Diff · History 946 Modern influence and critics: restore material about lawsuits; why was this removed?
Diff · History -26 "Less informed doctors"? her peer nutritionists largely didn't support her
Diff · History -127 not just "some doctors"; she was not well respected in her time by her peers
Diff · History 0 Move from lead to text
Diff · History 194 return this to the lead. Why was this removed?
Diff · History -168 not supported by the text
Diff · History -325 Social concerns about nutrition: why is this opinion notable?
Diff · History -849 Modern influence and critics: who is morton walker and why is their opinion notable? e book?
Diff · History -2 Scientific criticism: quotes instead of italics
Diff · History -17 not in source
Diff · History -1,306 Undid revision 625754926 by 174.48.125.189 (talk) POV changes against cited sources
Diff · History -36 Undid revision 585671004 by 76.171.148.62 (talk)not in cited source
Diff · History -5 Scientific criticism: most most
Diff · History 3 Scientific criticism: grammar
Diff · History -4 Scientific criticism:
Diff · History 5
Diff · History -4 "at times" not really right here
Diff · History 13 who criticised
Diff · History -23 WP:BOLD removal of POV banner
Diff · History 4 Health and nutrition work: wikilink
Diff · History 193 Scientific criticism: add
Diff · History -1 Background:
Diff · History 314 Expand lead
Diff · History 56 Scientific criticism: wikilinks
Diff · History -37 Scientific criticism: redundant
Diff · History 29 Health and nutrition work: subdivide
Diff · History -1 Health and nutrition work:
Diff · History 92 Health and nutrition work: add
Diff · History 1 External links:
Diff · History -245 remove further reading, add EL
Diff · History 2,060 Health and nutrition work: add
Diff · History 0 rearrange pictures
Diff · History 1,128 Health and nutrition work: update
Diff · History 313 Health and nutrition work:
Diff · History 19 Health and nutrition work: correct
Diff · History 147 Health and nutrition work: Interim, will need expansion
Diff · History 490 Background: clarify
Diff · History -18 don't really need a separate section for this
Diff · History 4 Background:
Diff · History -40 Publications: clarify
Diff · History -4 Background: unlink red link
Diff · History 105 Background: expand
Diff · History 36 Background, education and work: replace with independent source; add details
Diff · History -41
Diff · History -8 clarify
Diff · History -464 Commendations: I question the notability of a non-scientific poll on a conservative website
Diff · History -131 Don't think these categories applie
Diff · History -104 copy, remove
Diff · History -1,284 Make publication list
Diff · History -813 Need secondary source to show the need for weight
Diff · History -168 Rewrite, this sentence appears to be a copyvio from a book
Diff · History 21 more precise
Diff · History -68 External links: one of these is enough
Diff · History 4 More accurate "pioneer" doesn't quite fit when she didn't have support of most nutritionists on her theories
Diff · History -27 already in EL
Diff · History -63 References: change to inline; rest of "reference" appear to be further reading
Diff · History 64 Background, education and work: change to inline
Diff · History -235 References: changed to inline
Diff · History 67 Commendations: change to inline cite
Diff · History 97 Commendations: change to inline cite
Diff · History -102 External links: dubious relevance
Diff · History -39 References: IMDB not a RS
Diff · History -953 Health and nutrition work: we're citing IMDB now?
Diff · History -441 Commendations: need secondary sources to assess the WP:WEIGHT of their commendations
Diff · History -143 Commendations: not sure what that cite was supposed to be to, but does not appear appropriate
Diff · History 0 Swap sections around, this is a biography first
All times are in UTC.
Bahnsport-Info

Kostenfrei
Ansehen