Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Empiricism (Log · Page History) |
| User | K (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 350 |
| Minor edits | 45 (12.9%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 5 (1.4%) |
| Reverted edits | 2 (0.6%) |
| atbe1 | 4.7 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 29,268 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -21,704 |
Minor edits
·
45 (12.9%)
Major edits
·
305 (87.1%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
5 (1.4%)
Manual edits
·
345 (98.6%)
Reverted edits
·
2 (0.6%)
Unreverted edits
·
348 (99.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-10-11 12:34 | Diff · History | 0 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: minor correction of wording of W.James quote |
| 2010-09-27 01:43 | Diff · History | 14 | Turning sections on scientific and philosophical usages into subsections, and retitling "Etymology" as "Etymology and usage" |
| 2010-09-27 01:36 | Diff · History | -4 | →British empiricism: add'l tightening--no need for "his" in front of Locke's Essay |
| 2010-09-27 01:33 | Diff · History | -22 | →British empiricism: tweaks/syntax in first sentence of second paragraph of section |
| 2010-09-26 22:55 | Diff · History | 9 | →British empiricism: early-to-mid-17th century |
| 2010-09-26 22:54 | Diff · History | -40 | →British empiricism: moving quotation mark, adding piped wikilink, and copyediting to include Spinoza. ""Continental rationalists" is an accepted term of art in the history of philosophy |
| 2010-09-26 22:32 | Diff · History | 20 | Come to think of it, restoring prior sectioning. What's probably needed is a better description of differences in usage between "empirical" and "empiricism" |
| 2010-09-26 22:24 | Diff · History | -2 | →Early empiricism: Section title up one level |
| 2010-09-26 22:23 | Diff · History | -18 | →History: Removing section title "History"Empiricism is itself mostly historical, until turn of 20th C when pragmatists began to integrate it with reason or "rationalism" rather than separate it |
| 2009-06-14 02:34 | Diff · History | -36 | Undid revision 296279887 Self revert. Unnecessarily pointed out a polarity that depends on a community of researchers to sort out which is which |
| 2009-06-14 02:21 | Diff · History | 36 | (reverted) →Scientific usage: important little clarifier |
| 2008-12-14 04:23 | Diff · History | -836 | →Philosophical usage: Removing recently added paragraph, per WP:NOR and WP:V. The paragraph did not represent either philosophical or "scientific" usage of the word "empiricism" |
| 2008-12-12 04:52 | Diff · History | 113 | Undid revision 257416422 by 98.148.39.242 (talk) |
| 2008-12-11 16:59 | Diff · History | 0 | Moving see-also to before footnotes, per current WP layout convention |
| 2008-12-11 02:22 | Diff · History | -80 | →British empiricism: removing an essentially un-citable parenthetical, along with the request for citation |
| 2008-12-11 00:58 | Diff · History | -111 | →Philosophical usage: Removing preaching caveat |
| 2008-08-01 03:49 | Diff · History | -38 | additional clarification |
| 2008-08-01 03:46 | Diff · History | 22 | additional clarification |
| 2008-08-01 03:45 | Diff · History | -24 | An additional slight cleanup of the lead, following up on prior edit |
| 2008-08-01 03:42 | Diff · History | -25 | A bit more towards basics. This lead unfortunately has gotten away from a summary of what empiricism is regarded as among scholars. It's not as distinguished from "revelation" but from "innate" |
| 2007-11-18 20:28 | Diff · History | -1 | moving Psychological nativism into an external link |
| 2007-09-03 19:08 | Diff · History | -117 | →External links: Removing unpublished paper from external links |
| 2007-07-22 23:18 | Diff · History | -51 | Revert to the revision prior to revision 146152731 dated 2007-07-21 17:04:40 by KYPark using popups |
| 2007-07-05 01:21 | Diff · History | 150 | →British empiricism: inline citation -> footnote |
| 2007-05-16 17:12 | Diff · History | -1,272 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Removing an obscure and unsourced paragraph tacked onto the end of the article, and placing on Talk |
| 2007-05-16 17:10 | Diff · History | 0 | →Early forms of empiricism: |
| 2007-03-01 22:41 | Diff · History | -60 | Revert to revision 111842674 dated 2007-03-01 15:43:28 by Kenosis using popups |
| 2007-03-01 15:43 | Diff · History | 36 | →Philosophical usage: add Locke's words "white paper", pointed out earlier in Talk by Lucidish |
| 2007-02-19 18:22 | Diff · History | 53 | Replacing photo of William James |
| 2007-01-13 18:28 | Diff · History | 2 | →Philosophical usage: "those" -> certain |
| 2007-01-13 18:27 | Diff · History | -40 | →Philosophical usage: Correcting a mistaken reference to Sextus Empiricus, which conflated the two lines of etymology with one another. |
| 2007-01-13 17:02 | Diff · History | -1 | →Philosophical usage: comma |
| 2007-01-13 17:01 | Diff · History | 11 | →Philosophical usage: replacing "originally" |
| 2007-01-13 17:00 | Diff · History | 736 | →Scientific usage: Replacing explanation of scientific usage that was recently gutted and incorrectly summarized |
| 2006-12-21 20:24 | Diff · History | 4 | wikilink |
| 2006-12-21 20:23 | Diff · History | 6 | minor grammar in first sentence |
| 2006-12-21 20:22 | Diff · History | -71 | An attempt to integrate "discounting the notion of innate ideas" into the first sentence of article. User:Jcsf had a point in atempting to introduce the concept of "innate ideas" early in the articl |
| 2006-12-14 17:52 | Diff · History | 29 | Replacing footnotes section deleted by anon IP in November |
| 2006-11-15 04:08 | Diff · History | -1 | →British empiricism: replacing earlier version which was the correct one. Someone added the "prediction", then someone alse reversed the order of reference to Hume's categorization |
| 2006-10-03 03:49 | Diff · History | -286 | Removing the second sentence of intro., drawn from Keeton (1962) which erases the distinction of empiricism by including "all the contents of consciousness" |
| 2006-09-25 04:01 | Diff · History | -27 | Remove unsupported cleanup tag. This article received exceptionally careful attention to organization and content in the Spring of 2006. |
| 2006-09-21 23:09 | Diff · History | -42 | →Early forms of empiricism: Thanks to 204.48.118.49 , the last edit was on the right track. The source used for the sophists refers only to "predecessors", not other pre-socratics of 5th C. BC |
| 2006-08-21 02:30 | Diff · History | 6,012 | Revert to revision 69545419 dated 2006-08-14 08:17:52 by 82.119.243.214 using popups |
| 2006-07-26 18:22 | Diff · History | 1 | →Early forms of empiricism: punctuation |
| 2006-07-26 18:21 | Diff · History | 8 | →Early forms of empiricism: Footnote |
| 2006-07-26 18:19 | Diff · History | 115 | →History: Footnote |
| 2006-07-26 18:15 | Diff · History | 18 | →Early forms of empiricism: Aristotle cite placed into footnote |
| 2006-07-26 18:12 | Diff · History | -2 | →Scientific usage: rmv superluous parentheses |
| 2006-07-26 18:04 | Diff · History | 0 | Move image of JS Mill out of footnote and back into body text |
| 2006-07-26 18:03 | Diff · History | 0 | Nice move WikiPedant. Doing similarly with the pragmatists James and Dewey |
| 2006-07-25 19:08 | Diff · History | -43 | Minor follow-up on WikiPedant's copyedit of intro |
| 2006-07-25 00:10 | Diff · History | 140 | inline ref |
| 2006-07-25 00:09 | Diff · History | -118 | Rmv incorrect assertion that "empiricism" is strictly limited to the Brits of 17th and 18th Centuries, as the article explains below. |
| 2006-07-09 02:52 | Diff · History | 146 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-09 02:49 | Diff · History | 511 | →History: footnotes |
| 2006-07-09 02:47 | Diff · History | 81 | →Early forms of empiricism: footnote |
| 2006-07-08 13:38 | Diff · History | -2 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: fix footnote |
| 2006-07-08 13:38 | Diff · History | 99 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 13:34 | Diff · History | -224 | →References: |
| 2006-07-08 13:28 | Diff · History | 1 | →Early forms of empiricism: footnote |
| 2006-07-08 13:27 | Diff · History | 86 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 13:23 | Diff · History | -6 | →Logical empiricism: footnote |
| 2006-07-08 13:22 | Diff · History | 304 | →Logical empiricism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 13:15 | Diff · History | 1 | →Phenomenalism: period |
| 2006-07-08 13:14 | Diff · History | 164 | →Phenomenalism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 13:12 | Diff · History | 1,162 | →Phenomenalism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 12:56 | Diff · History | 371 | →British empiricism: footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 12:52 | Diff · History | 376 | →Early forms of empiricism: Footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 12:45 | Diff · History | 213 | Footnotes |
| 2006-07-08 12:41 | Diff · History | 177 | →Philosophical usage: Footnote |
| 2006-07-08 12:39 | Diff · History | 106 | →Philosophical usage: Footnote |
| 2006-06-20 03:46 | Diff · History | 0 | →Phenomenalism: semicolon -> comma |
| 2006-06-12 16:43 | Diff · History | -257 | Rmv unnecessarily specific and confusing material from first into paragraph |
| 2006-05-16 19:32 | Diff · History | 19 | →Early forms of empiricism: Replace deleted reference |
| 2006-05-16 04:30 | Diff · History | 25 | →Scientific usage: Minor followup of Daanschr's edits. Adjust syntax in last paragraph of section |
| 2006-05-15 18:33 | Diff · History | 9 | →Scientific usage: minor followup of Daanschr's edit. Rmv parentheses and integrate in last paragraph of section |
| 2006-05-15 16:43 | Diff · History | 9 | →Scientific usage: Minor syntax issue in last paragraph |
| 2006-05-15 16:41 | Diff · History | 33 | →Scientific usage: Put alchemy in proper context |
| 2006-05-15 16:39 | Diff · History | -68 | →Scientific usage: Rmv "At the base of this contradiction was theological dispute." |
| 2006-05-15 16:39 | Diff · History | -114 | Rmv incorrect "17th century English theology was against the continental theology that humans can understand god's creation with reason." This was disupted in England too. |
| 2006-05-15 16:37 | Diff · History | 4 | →Scientific usage: Correction of first sentence, third paragraph |
| 2006-05-15 16:35 | Diff · History | -147 | →Scientific usage: Rmv incorrect "Continental scientists like Descartes, Leibniz and Leeuwenhoek preferred to use deduction to find arguments to describe everything." |
| 2006-05-15 16:33 | Diff · History | -51 | →Scientific usage: Rmv "...and to determine what is true and what is not true." Yes, this is true, and does not explain anything here except that they were researchers of some kind |
| 2006-05-15 16:31 | Diff · History | -47 | →Scientific usage: Rmv "Induction limited the fields of study in theory. " as wholly inconsistent with the content that follows |
| 2006-05-15 16:30 | Diff · History | -9 | →Scientific usage: Merge two sentences in third paragraph |
| 2006-05-15 16:29 | Diff · History | -43 | →Scientific usage: Rmv " instead of the aristotelian deduction" wholly incorrect perspective |
| 2006-05-15 01:45 | Diff · History | -83 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Rmv from Dewey "..., in contrast to James' conception of experience as collective rather than singular." Not representative of their respective views |
| 2006-05-15 01:37 | Diff · History | 0 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Resize Dewey and James photo to accommodate change in the Dewey photo in Wikipedia database |
| 2006-05-11 01:05 | Diff · History | -1,954 | →Empiricism and magic: Rmv highly erroneous, rambling new section full of POV's and place on the talk page for evaluation |
| 2006-05-09 03:43 | Diff · History | 315 | Revert to revision 51743178 using popups |
| 2006-04-29 02:08 | Diff · History | -18 | →Philosophical usage: Rmv excess, per Lucidish's quest for an accurate summary here. This just a tentative followup until determining Locke's participation in words "tabula rasa" itself |
| 2006-04-29 01:51 | Diff · History | 16 | →British empiricism: Correct this per Lucidish's identification of the correct words from his Essay Concerning Human Understanding |
| 2006-04-29 01:48 | Diff · History | 17 | →British empiricism: Add "white paper" which was Locke's wording in the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, following Lucidish's apt correction of Locke's Essay's wording; thanks Lucidish ! |
| 2006-04-28 21:36 | Diff · History | 21 | →Philosophical usage: blank slate -> add blank tablet per Lucidish's quest for accuracy here |
| 2006-04-28 21:33 | Diff · History | 1 | →British empiricism: blank slate -> blank tablet to more accurately quote Locke, per Lucidish's quest for accuracy here |
| 2006-04-27 00:00 | Diff · History | 12 | →British empiricism: clarify the date ref to Hume. Average reader does not need to see 1902 attached to Hume; why are academic-style citations being used in an encylopedia? Method for footnotes |
| 2006-04-26 21:52 | Diff · History | -71 | →British empiricism: Revert. The prior editor is confusing "tabula rasa" which is translated as "scraped tablet" |
| 2006-04-26 17:16 | Diff · History | -42 | →British empiricism: Rmv conclusory POV about Berkeley ("This is not reduced to solipsism because..."). Many critics of phenomenalism/subjective idealism completely disagree. |
| 2006-04-26 15:21 | Diff · History | -453 | Rmv newly placed material in first introductory paragraph and place on the talk page for further analysis and/or development |
| 2006-04-21 02:44 | Diff · History | 111 | →Early forms of empiricism: locus and summary of Plato's opposition to Sophists |
| 2006-04-21 02:23 | Diff · History | 36 | →Early forms of empiricism: |
| 2006-04-15 22:05 | Diff · History | 0 | →Early forms of empiricism: reverse words "would today" |
| 2006-04-15 22:03 | Diff · History | 27 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor clarification in Aquinas paragraph |
| 2006-04-15 19:33 | Diff · History | -1 | →Early forms of empiricism: Rmv space before period |
| 2006-04-14 18:35 | Diff · History | -652 | →Philosophical usage: Putting the meta-linguistic analysis (an excellent one incidentally) on the talk page to see if it can be rephrased and used in the article somwhere |
| 2006-04-14 18:32 | Diff · History | 2 | →Philosophical usage: Separate somewhat lengthy paragraph into two paragraphs. Please disregard my last edit explanation, because it does not properly reflect the edits I made to this section |
| 2006-04-14 18:26 | Diff · History | 146 | →Philosophical usage: add qualification "historically" to the very basic description of rationalism, because rationalsim today is quite fond of empirical method, but not fond of faith-based "truth |
| 2006-04-14 17:58 | Diff · History | 86 | Integrate stranded brief paragraph on etymology into introduction in one of several possible reasonable ways,, rather than in between two paragraphs dealing with current usages. |
| 2006-04-14 17:30 | Diff · History | 0 | →British empiricism: cite format for reference to Berkeley's view as subjective idealism |
| 2006-04-14 17:23 | Diff · History | 0 | Rmv meta-linguistic discussion from intro and put it in "Pilosophical usage" section |
| 2006-04-14 17:17 | Diff · History | -95 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: link to replace stranded footnote |
| 2006-04-14 17:09 | Diff · History | 0 | Order of presentation, paragraphs in intro, explanation of "isms" moved to after presentation of the main "ism" at issue in this article |
| 2006-04-14 17:05 | Diff · History | -3 | →Philosophical usage: nowadays -> today |
| 2006-04-14 16:45 | Diff · History | 78 | For the present, wikify "heuristic", "dogmatic" and "reductive" (Reduction (philosophy)) for the previously uninformed reader, second introductory paragraph |
| 2006-04-14 15:58 | Diff · History | 195 | Important clarification to the second introductory paragraph, one with which all recent contributing editors are already familiar |
| 2006-04-14 15:12 | Diff · History | 14 | →Phenomenalism: cite clarification |
| 2006-04-14 14:41 | Diff · History | 16 | →Phenomenalism: |
| 2006-04-13 23:00 | Diff · History | 12 | →Philosophical usage: Minor modification of last sentence, first paragraph of section |
| 2006-04-13 21:15 | Diff · History | 49 | →Philosophical usage: slight clarification of last sentence, first paragraph of section, |
| 2006-04-13 17:21 | Diff · History | -4 | Rmv superfluous "are" in second paragraph of section |
| 2006-04-13 17:13 | Diff · History | 0 | →History: Resize Russell pic slightly |
| 2006-04-13 17:01 | Diff · History | -15 | Rmv "otherwise very [distinct]" from introductory sentence, because the following sentence proceeds to say "as a general rule" |
| 2006-04-13 06:37 | Diff · History | 0 | →Phenomenalism: rmv superfluous preposition, and add a matched pair of quotation marks |
| 2006-04-13 04:27 | Diff · History | 145 | (reverted) footnote format in current introductory paragraph |
| 2006-04-13 04:09 | Diff · History | 32 | →Phenomenalism: minor clarification, Mill paragraph |
| 2006-04-13 04:02 | Diff · History | 6 | →Phenomenalism: add the word "which" in Mill paragraph |
| 2006-04-13 03:45 | Diff · History | 121 | →Phenomenalism: Slight further clarification of Mill's position relates to accepted meanings of terms such as "induction", the type of inference Mill was asserting all knowledge derives from |
| 2006-04-13 03:35 | Diff · History | 0 | →Phenomenalism: typo; "inanswereable" -> "unanswerable" |
| 2006-04-13 03:33 | Diff · History | 2,093 | some material to clarify the encapsulation of Mill's position, and what were its main problems that resulted in virtually unanimous abandonment of his position |
| 2006-04-12 18:17 | Diff · History | 119 | Footnote |
| 2006-04-12 07:31 | Diff · History | -127 | →Phenomenalism: Rmv "Mill's empiricism thus said that knowledge of any kind is not from direct experience but an inference from direct experience". His point was, upon analysis, different than this |
| 2006-04-12 07:19 | Diff · History | 6 | slightly resize pic |
| 2006-04-12 07:14 | Diff · History | -6 | →British empiricism: Slightly resize Berkeley pic |
| 2006-04-12 07:08 | Diff · History | 0 | Resize Aristotle pic |
| 2006-04-12 07:02 | Diff · History | 5 | Move pic |
| 2006-04-12 01:17 | Diff · History | 6 | →History: Reduce the size of the Bertrand Russell and William James photos slightly for fit and facial size |
| 2006-04-12 00:47 | Diff · History | 18 | Reduce the size of several photos slightly, to roughly match portrait size a bit better |
| 2006-04-12 00:27 | Diff · History | 58 | →British empiricism: Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 15:23 | Diff · History | -2 | →British empiricism: "inspired" -> "led to" in Hume illustration. "Inspired" could mistakenly imply that Hume did not create a real quandary here |
| 2006-04-11 03:22 | Diff · History | 36 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Date context for Peirce/James/Dewey |
| 2006-04-11 03:16 | Diff · History | 10 | →Logical empiricism: date context for the positivists |
| 2006-04-11 02:03 | Diff · History | 47 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:55 | Diff · History | 51 | Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:51 | Diff · History | 72 | Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:45 | Diff · History | -1 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Fmt photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:44 | Diff · History | 89 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:42 | Diff · History | 50 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Add photo |
| 2006-04-11 01:37 | Diff · History | 2 | usually -> commonly, in intro. Thanks Knucmo2, for informative wording of this contrast compared to the earlier version about rationalism that caused confusion and was deleted. |
| 2006-04-10 19:12 | Diff · History | -11 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: fix citation-needed template. thanks Knucmo2 |
| 2006-04-10 16:16 | Diff · History | 20 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: citation needed, as this latter part of paragraph is more than a summary of cited sources here |
| 2006-04-10 16:11 | Diff · History | 8 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: citation-needed |
| 2006-04-10 16:08 | Diff · History | 10 | →Logical empiricism: citation-needed |
| 2006-04-10 15:52 | Diff · History | 0 | Place "Logical Empricism" prior to "Integration...", as the Peirce/James/Dewey thread is the one leading up to today in science (Peirce) and academia (Dewey), and merge. Nice work Lacatosias & Knucmo2 |
| 2006-04-10 05:19 | Diff · History | 20 | →British empiricism: add a footnote to the first Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-10 02:30 | Diff · History | 49 | →Early forms of empiricism: Add footnote in Aristotle paragraph |
| 2006-04-10 02:26 | Diff · History | 18 | →British empiricism: "of" -> "for the principle of" in Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-10 02:18 | Diff · History | -1 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor cleanup in Aristotle paragraph, and move the previous foornote--PLEASE PROVIDE REFERENCES! |
| 2006-04-10 01:58 | Diff · History | 180 | →British empiricism: Replace the brief capsulation of Hume's problem of induction as before |
| 2006-04-10 01:50 | Diff · History | -89 | →British empiricism: Delete superfluous sentence; point is already made before, and the problem of induction has a link to that article |
| 2006-04-09 17:42 | Diff · History | -73 | →Early forms of empiricism: delete uninformative/confusing phrase, and change "and" -> "of" & remv dead link |
| 2006-04-08 04:07 | Diff · History | -3 | →Phenomenalism: Hume's -> his |
| 2006-04-08 03:46 | Diff · History | -3 | fmt |
| 2006-04-08 03:43 | Diff · History | -4 | replace earlier wording of the second paragraph of intro, but with reference to philosophy of science, which is where it's typically used today, per Wikipedia guidelines on introductions. |
| 2006-04-08 03:27 | Diff · History | -159 | Delete contended passage about empiricism having given way to "empirical" within contemporary science--tough to prove a negative, but it will need sourcing if it's to be stated that way |
| 2006-04-07 23:12 | Diff · History | -6 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: delete the word "other" in Peirce paragraph |
| 2006-04-07 22:36 | Diff · History | 284 | →Phenomenalism: Provide a more directly informative standard summary-definition of phenomenalism, while preserving existing content w/o dealing with the linguistic/factual phenomenalism issue here |
| 2006-04-07 17:51 | Diff · History | 183 | →Early forms of empiricism: Put a brief "clarifier" after the Peirce observation; I still question whether this "2wayfeedback" insight of Peirce belongs here, but it at least needs clearer context |
| 2006-04-07 17:16 | Diff · History | 40 | →Scientific usage: Further clarify the term "semi-empirical" for now; this will need to be further researched, pinned down securely and properly sourced |
| 2006-04-07 16:02 | Diff · History | -9 | →The British empiricists: correction rmv mistaken denominational affiliation of Berkeley |
| 2006-04-07 15:59 | Diff · History | 112 | →The British empiricists: add note on Berkeley |
| 2006-04-07 15:48 | Diff · History | -58 | Rmv unnecessary internal link |
| 2006-04-07 15:31 | Diff · History | 58 | clarification in second paragraph |
| 2006-04-07 15:10 | Diff · History | -11 | →Scientific usage: syntax in second paragraph |
| 2006-04-07 06:06 | Diff · History | 22 | →Philosophical usage: Add JS Mill to the mill |
| 2006-04-07 05:57 | Diff · History | -29 | put reference in consistent format with others in article, and combine into paragraph above; I still think this Peirce observation will need to end up farther down in the article, but don't know |
| 2006-04-07 05:35 | Diff · History | -352 | →Early forms of empiricism: Rmv added explanation from the Early forms of empiricism section, and place on talk just in case; it's enough of a stretch to mention Peirce in this section |
| 2006-04-07 05:33 | Diff · History | 0 | →Early forms of empiricism: is -> in ... last paragraph of section; not sure this paragraph and explanation belongs in this particular section though |
| 2006-04-07 05:29 | Diff · History | 8 | →Early forms of empiricism: simplify language so it is a bit more accessible in last paragraph of section, and put a needed time-frame on it in body text |
| 2006-04-07 05:26 | Diff · History | 4 | →Early forms of empiricism: Source the paripatetic axiom where it is first introduced, and wikify |
| 2006-04-07 05:22 | Diff · History | -132 | →Scientific usage: Rmv last sentence of this section, as it was unnecessarily oblique and not informative |
| 2006-04-07 05:17 | Diff · History | 64 | →Scientific usage: add qualification "sometimes" to clarify how commonly the term "semi-empirical" is put to use, and within what realm it is generally used |
| 2006-04-07 04:33 | Diff · History | 2 | fmt |
| 2006-04-07 04:32 | Diff · History | 2 | fmt |
| 2006-04-07 04:32 | Diff · History | 2 | fmt |
| 2006-04-07 04:31 | Diff · History | 156 | Clarify the form currently used for describing the empirical methods per Wikipedia guidelines for article introductions |
| 2006-04-07 03:49 | Diff · History | -11 | Tentatively remove verification tag. We could still use a couple more citations for included material, but not enough to justify the tag for the whole article at this stage |
| 2006-04-07 03:46 | Diff · History | 42 | →Early forms of empiricism: Clarify where the paripatetic axiom originated (and a minor simplification of language). Thanks Jon Awbrey! |
| 2006-04-07 02:44 | Diff · History | 28 | →Phenomenalism: Clarify blockquote source in body text re. JS Mill |
| 2006-04-07 02:37 | Diff · History | 24 | →Phenomenalism: clarify Mill's time-frame, for those readers not already familiar |
| 2006-04-07 02:19 | Diff · History | 925 | →Phenomenalism: Add some further insight into Mill's important positioning leading from Hume, a secondary quote and reference |
| 2006-04-07 01:06 | Diff · History | 135 | →Early forms of empiricism: footnote re. Aquinas' theory of knowledge |
| 2006-04-07 00:59 | Diff · History | 140 | →Early forms of empiricism: Rmv the latin rendering of Aquinas, which is unnecessary for almost all readers of this article, and provide a footnote |
| 2006-04-06 23:31 | Diff · History | 70 | →Early forms of empiricism: clarification re. Aquinas for those more unfamiliar with this material |
| 2006-04-06 22:09 | Diff · History | 41 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: add seealso |
| 2006-04-06 22:05 | Diff · History | 744 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: Delete a bit from Peirce, and add a summary by Richard McCartyr; we still need at least one reliable reference for Peirce's relationship to rationalists |
| 2006-04-06 21:26 | Diff · History | -4 | →The British empiricists: delete superfluous "the" |
| 2006-04-06 21:26 | Diff · History | -23 | →The British empiricists: delete superfluous "empiricist philosopher" referencing John Locke |
| 2006-04-06 20:22 | Diff · History | 7 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor clarification in Sophists paragraph |
| 2006-04-06 20:03 | Diff · History | 8 | →Early forms of empiricism: Clarify who "they" are, Sophists... as opposed to the other pre-Socratics mentioned |
| 2006-04-06 19:29 | Diff · History | 180 | →The British empiricists: add a clarification of where Berkeley ends up fitting in here, and reference |
| 2006-04-06 18:58 | Diff · History | 0 | →Early forms of empiricism: of -> by ; in first paragraph |
| 2006-04-06 18:37 | Diff · History | -1 | →Early forms of empiricism: rmv unnecessary comma |
| 2006-04-06 18:10 | Diff · History | 41 | →Early forms of empiricism: clean up wikis in section somewhat |
| 2006-04-06 17:46 | Diff · History | 260 | →Early forms of empiricism: Clarification in Footnote on Plato/Aristotle |
| 2006-04-06 17:39 | Diff · History | 144 | →Early forms of empiricism: Clarify relative time frame of Plato/Aristotle's new set of speculative/empirical contentions with one another, & a clarification of Plato in footnote |
| 2006-04-06 17:29 | Diff · History | 21 | →Early forms of empiricism: time frame of the Sophists |
| 2006-04-06 17:18 | Diff · History | 120 | →Early forms of empiricism: Footnote for Stoics and Epicureans |
| 2006-04-06 17:12 | Diff · History | 370 | →Early forms of empiricism: Add footnotes on Aristotle |
| 2006-04-06 16:35 | Diff · History | 194 | →Early forms of empiricism: put Sophists in a bit more explicit perspective; even the rationalist Plato would later argue Sophists were highly un-empirical. Thanks Lacatosias for clarifying |
| 2006-04-06 05:35 | Diff · History | 7 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor clarification to Plato's basic stance; replace Lacatosias' adverb "deeply" to clarify the extent to which Plato was "rationalistic" in comparison to Aristotle |
| 2006-04-06 04:39 | Diff · History | 25 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor adjustment of Aristotle/Plato paragraph |
| 2006-04-06 04:32 | Diff · History | -541 | →Early forms of empiricism: Rmv unsourced and speculative POV about sophists... at most, they were extremely-non-empirically-minded argumentative skeptics, even by Plato's description |
| 2006-04-06 04:01 | Diff · History | 318 | →Early forms of empiricism: Add some basic material putting Aristotle in perspective, as he is so arguably the first empiricist |
| 2006-04-06 02:49 | Diff · History | 1 | →Early forms of empiricism: typo |
| 2006-04-06 02:49 | Diff · History | 95 | →Early forms of empiricism: clarify Plato/Aristotle a bit, but without significantly expanding summary of his contribution for now |
| 2006-04-06 02:18 | Diff · History | 65 | →Early forms of empiricism: clarify time-frame in second paragraph |
| 2006-04-06 01:48 | Diff · History | -5 | →Philosophical usage: simplify |
| 2006-04-05 16:32 | Diff · History | 266 | →Philosophical usage: Clarify Empiricus somewhat. The superposition of Empiricus with the derivation from the Greek still needs to be better sourced. |
| 2006-04-05 15:34 | Diff · History | -6 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: correction-- this is Cambridge, Massachusetts, not Cambridge in England |
| 2006-04-05 13:56 | Diff · History | 1 | →Early forms of empiricism: Typo in last paragraph of section; still not sure this statement by Peirce belongs in this section, though it's an apt observation |
| 2006-04-05 13:45 | Diff · History | 30 | →Scientific usage: add link; the Empirical method article presently is better developed than Empirical research article |
| 2006-04-05 06:13 | Diff · History | 10 | →Early forms of empiricism: minor clarification to Epicurians' position |
| 2006-04-05 05:37 | Diff · History | 1 | →The British empiricists: footnote form |
| 2006-04-05 05:36 | Diff · History | 5 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: footnote form |
| 2006-04-05 05:34 | Diff · History | -18 | →See also: Rmv Behaviorism from "See also" section |
| 2006-04-05 05:33 | Diff · History | 54 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: footnote in James paragraph |
| 2006-04-05 05:28 | Diff · History | -9 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: delete superfluous "actually" in James paragraph |
| 2006-04-05 05:21 | Diff · History | 0 | →The British empiricists: correct date ref in Hume footnote |
| 2006-04-05 03:33 | Diff · History | -19 | →The British empiricists: simplify and clarify time-frame from Locke to Berkeley; date of Berkeley's Treatise already given |
| 2006-04-05 03:30 | Diff · History | 76 | →The British empiricists: Reference in Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-05 03:23 | Diff · History | -3 | →Early forms of empiricism: rmv superfluous preposition |
| 2006-04-05 02:43 | Diff · History | 4 | →The British empiricists: finish clarification of Hume, from last edit |
| 2006-04-05 02:41 | Diff · History | -2 | →The British empiricists: minor clarification in Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-05 02:37 | Diff · History | 1 | →The British empiricists: space after comma |
| 2006-04-05 02:34 | Diff · History | 46 | →Early forms of empiricism: clarification of time-frame for Charles Peirce; this is good insight, but I'm not positive this section is the place for it |
| 2006-04-05 01:49 | Diff · History | 4 | →Early forms of empiricism: gender neutr. |
| 2006-04-05 01:19 | Diff · History | 10 | →Early forms of empiricism: add a priori and a posteriori here. This distinction remained important through the 19th Century at least |
| 2006-04-05 01:10 | Diff · History | 1 | →Early forms of empiricism: gender neutr. |
| 2006-04-04 17:05 | Diff · History | -18 | →Early forms of empiricism: Rmv stub template from section--Sensible additions, extremely useful historical context; thanks Lacatosias |
| 2006-04-04 16:26 | Diff · History | 1 | →Phenomenalism: typos |
| 2006-04-04 16:08 | Diff · History | -12 | Rnv cleanup tag and leave verification tag. This article appears to be very significantly more organized than when the tag was first placed here, pending ongoing discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-04 00:36 | Diff · History | -14 | →Historical variations: Simplify section title, pending ongoing discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-04 00:31 | Diff · History | -6 | →Scientific usage: rmv extra word "means" |
| 2006-04-04 00:28 | Diff · History | -26 | →Scientific usage: rmv excess words |
| 2006-04-04 00:27 | Diff · History | 3 | →Scientific usage: add 'of' |
| 2006-04-04 00:26 | Diff · History | -8 | →Scientific usage: rmv equivocation "usually" |
| 2006-04-04 00:08 | Diff · History | 0 | →Scientific usage: fmt link |
| 2006-04-04 00:07 | Diff · History | 5 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: typo, and wikify link to "empirical" |
| 2006-04-03 23:57 | Diff · History | 4 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: add "for" |
| 2006-04-03 23:50 | Diff · History | 25 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: minor clarification of point 2 in Peirce paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 23:22 | Diff · History | 0 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: close parenthesis |
| 2006-04-03 23:21 | Diff · History | 58 | →Integration of empiricism and rationalism: add links to other offshoots emanating from Kant and Hume |
| 2006-04-03 23:07 | Diff · History | 1 | →See also: |
| 2006-04-03 23:07 | Diff · History | -4 | →See also: |
| 2006-04-03 23:02 | Diff · History | 12 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: retitle subsection to reflect its place in the history of empiricism |
| 2006-04-03 22:58 | Diff · History | -7 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: minor clarification |
| 2006-04-03 22:56 | Diff · History | 43 | →See also: add Phenomenology and Phenomenological |
| 2006-04-03 22:52 | Diff · History | 186 | →The British empiricists: clarify the last paragraph a bit because it was somewhat stranded; correct a couple of typos |
| 2006-04-03 22:26 | Diff · History | -9 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: minor correction in language, last paragraph of section |
| 2006-04-03 21:41 | Diff · History | -28 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: minor correction of form of a link in first paragraph of section |
| 2006-04-03 21:39 | Diff · History | 8 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: rmv superfluous link, and a minor clarification |
| 2006-04-03 21:38 | Diff · History | 28 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: syntax and clarification in Peirce paragraph, pending ongoing discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 21:33 | Diff · History | 455 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: clarification and addition to Peirce paragraph, pending outcome of current discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 21:20 | Diff · History | 1 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: space between words |
| 2006-04-03 21:20 | Diff · History | 31 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: correction in first sentence of this paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 21:18 | Diff · History | -19 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: clarification in first paragraph of this section |
| 2006-04-03 21:17 | Diff · History | 20 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: clarification in first paragraph of this section |
| 2006-04-03 21:07 | Diff · History | -587 | →Criticisms: Rmv criticism based upon quantum mechanics and place it on the talk page; this almost certainly belongs in the Phonomenology and/or phenomenological |
| 2006-04-03 20:25 | Diff · History | -325 | →Constructivism: Rmv constructivism from criticisms and place on the talk page... it was a stub, unsourced and is now on Talk for examination |
| 2006-04-03 19:55 | Diff · History | 35 | Add link to main article on scientific usage, which is current; most of the recognized philosophic usage is a historical analysis |
| 2006-04-03 19:27 | Diff · History | -5 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: minor clarification in James paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 19:26 | Diff · History | 830 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: Corrections and clarifications per Jon Aubrey's well-researched points on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 18:44 | Diff · History | -1,149 | →Thomas Kuhn — ''The Structure of Scientific Revolutions'': |
| 2006-04-03 18:36 | Diff · History | 9 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: tentative correction, pending further organzation of ONGOING editing and cleanup-- "Naive empiricism" indeed; see history and discussion |
| 2006-04-03 18:32 | Diff · History | -17 | →Phenomenalism: Rmv Phenomenalism section until consensus can be achieved on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 18:31 | Diff · History | -794 | →Phenomenalism: Rmvd two marginally related or arguably irrelevant stub sections and place on talk page for discussion |
| 2006-04-03 17:55 | Diff · History | 12 | replace cleanup tag |
| 2006-04-03 17:48 | Diff · History | -4,837 | →Phenomenalism: Remove lengthy section on Phenomenalism and place on the talk page for discussion and consensus; it is, in current form, largely unsourced and filled with POVs |
| 2006-04-03 17:43 | Diff · History | -1,050 | →Immanuel Kant: rmvd and put on talk page for discussion |
| 2006-04-03 17:40 | Diff · History | -227 | →Comtemporary empiricm: Remove unsourced POV and put it on the talk page |
| 2006-04-03 17:39 | Diff · History | 268 | →The British empiricists: dates and sources in section, and a clarification of Berkeley |
| 2006-04-03 17:27 | Diff · History | -1 | →Scientific usage: typo |
| 2006-04-03 17:23 | Diff · History | 1 | →Philosophical usage: minor clarification in first par of section |
| 2006-04-03 17:22 | Diff · History | 9 | →Philosophical usage: clarification in first paragraph of section |
| 2006-04-03 17:12 | Diff · History | -11 | |
| 2006-04-03 17:11 | Diff · History | -7 | →The British empiricists: simplify time frame a bit |
| 2006-04-03 17:02 | Diff · History | 44 | →Immanuel Kant: links |
| 2006-04-03 17:01 | Diff · History | 4 | →Immanuel Kant: wikify Kant's "Critique" |
| 2006-04-03 16:58 | Diff · History | 19 | →Immanuel Kant: clarification in Kant subsection, pending discussion on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 16:57 | Diff · History | 984 | →Historical variations: Add some material on Kant to form a tentative bridge from Hume to Peirce and James, pending discussion on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 16:38 | Diff · History | 4 | →The British empiricists: wikify a posteriori |
| 2006-04-03 16:17 | Diff · History | -2 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: syntax and clarify a bit |
| 2006-04-03 16:15 | Diff · History | 8 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: italicize, and a minor clarification in Peirce/James |
| 2006-04-03 16:13 | Diff · History | -65 | combine two sentences into one, and add a clarification |
| 2006-04-03 16:02 | Diff · History | -1 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: rmv stranded apostrophe |
| 2006-04-03 16:01 | Diff · History | 3 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: wikify "Pragmatic theory of truth" |
| 2006-04-03 15:58 | Diff · History | 4 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: simplify time-frame here, and add Dewey to make accurate who the principal exponents of pragmatism were |
| 2006-04-03 15:53 | Diff · History | 106 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: syntax and clarification |
| 2006-04-03 15:48 | Diff · History | 89 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: clarification in Peirce/James |
| 2006-04-03 15:40 | Diff · History | -1 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: typo |
| 2006-04-03 15:37 | Diff · History | 860 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: Add a paragraph on William James |
| 2006-04-03 15:24 | Diff · History | 4 | →C.S. Peirce and William James: clarification in Peirce/James |
| 2006-04-03 15:23 | Diff · History | 665 | →Historical variations: Add some preliminary material to section on Peirce and James |
| 2006-04-03 15:11 | Diff · History | 0 | →The British empiricists: theories -> concepts in first paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 15:09 | Diff · History | 6 | →Scientific usage: clarify the current scientific usage somewhat |
| 2006-04-03 15:07 | Diff · History | 157 | →Scientific usage: Tighten up the definition of scientific usage somewhat |
| 2006-04-03 06:02 | Diff · History | 0 | →Historical variations: Put the last two subsections of this section in chronological order |
| 2006-04-03 05:34 | Diff · History | 85 | →The British empiricists: add a clarification or two to Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 05:28 | Diff · History | 14 | →The British empiricists: minor clarification in the Hume paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 05:22 | Diff · History | 41 | →Historical variations: syntax and section-stub template |
| 2006-04-03 05:20 | Diff · History | 35 | Quantum_mechanics'>→Quantum mechanics: rmv link from subsection title, place in body text... add stub template |
| 2006-04-03 05:17 | Diff · History | 55 | Constructivism'>→Constructivism: rmv link from subsection heading, place link in body text... + add stub template |
| 2006-04-03 05:15 | Diff · History | 8 | →Historiographic studies: section-stub template |
| 2006-04-03 05:13 | Diff · History | 15 | →Historiographic studies: Add Renke's full name and roughly date his contribution... + add stub template |
| 2006-04-03 05:11 | Diff · History | 5 | →Historical studies: retitle subsection to mitigate potential confusion with the section title |
| 2006-04-03 05:10 | Diff · History | 35 | Constructive_empiricism'>→Constructive empiricism: rmv link from subsection title, move link to body text |
| 2006-04-03 05:05 | Diff · History | 3 | →The British empiricists: position -> proposition in Locke paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 04:46 | Diff · History | -11 | Rmv the verify tag. Questionable material now on the talk page for further consideration by interested editors |
| 2006-04-03 04:35 | Diff · History | 27 | →The British empiricists: minor corrections in section |
| 2006-04-03 04:31 | Diff · History | 188 | →The British empiricists: Add a sentence to the Locke paragraph, pending further discussion on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 04:30 | Diff · History | 1,138 | →The British empiricists: Add a paragraph on Hume, tentatively pending outcome of discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-03 03:52 | Diff · History | 12 | →The British empiricists: minor clarification in Descartes & Locke paragraph |
| 2006-04-03 03:51 | Diff · History | -1 | →The British empiricists: link |
| 2006-04-03 03:48 | Diff · History | 10 | →The British empiricists: minor clarifications in section |
| 2006-04-03 03:05 | Diff · History | 11 | →Variations: Retitle this section to reflect content and put the material in proper perspective |
| 2006-04-03 03:04 | Diff · History | 922 | →The British empiricists: Add some material to this section, which will need to be further organized; David Hume still to be added to this summary. |
| 2006-04-02 23:09 | Diff · History | -395 | →The British empiricists: Remove misleading and confusing conflation and place on talk page for reconsideration |
| 2006-04-02 23:07 | Diff · History | -2 | →The British empiricists: rmv whitespace |
| 2006-04-02 22:58 | Diff · History | -357 | Naïve_empiricism'>→Naïve empiricism: Delete erroneous section on "Naive empiricism", and place it on the talk page |
| 2006-04-02 22:21 | Diff · History | 1 | →Pre-classical empiricism: Retitle this section to something reasonable, pending discussions on talk page |
| 2006-04-02 22:19 | Diff · History | -37 | →Classical empiricism: Retitle this section, because the title was incorrect. Classical refers to the period of Plato and Aristotle, among others. |
| 2006-04-02 21:26 | Diff · History | -279 | →Moderate empiricism: Removing this section for now and placing it on the talk page. The sentence is correct, but stranded and substantially mislabeled as "Moderate empiricism" |
| 2006-04-02 21:20 | Diff · History | -726 | →Radical empiricism: Removing this section for now and placing it on the talk page, because it misrepresents William James' form of pragmatism propounded around the turn of 20th Century |
| 2006-04-01 16:31 | Diff · History | 91 | clarification of second introductory paragraph to place the use of the term in contemporary science |
| 2006-04-01 16:22 | Diff · History | -203 | Rmv sentence in intro paragraph about 'as opposed to rationalism', because rationalism is not inherently in opposition; this is a more complex analysis and not for the intro paragraph |
| 2006-04-01 16:20 | Diff · History | 50 | clarification in first intro sentence |
| 2006-04-01 16:18 | Diff · History | -32 | Rmv "and minimizes the role of reason" from first introductory sentence which is inaccurate in any form of usage |
| 2006-04-01 16:13 | Diff · History | 0 | Fmt introductory paragraph to merge stray sentence into paragraph...Thanks Lacatosias for the extremely well considered edits |
| 2006-03-30 04:24 | Diff · History | 20 | →Classical empiricism: chonology and add other important figure of classical empiricism |
| 2006-03-29 08:07 | Diff · History | -4 | →Philosophical usage: put notable figures in chronological order for now |
| 2006-03-29 08:04 | Diff · History | 24 | →Scientific usage: rearrange first paragraph of this section somewhat |
| 2006-03-29 08:00 | Diff · History | 263 | →Scientific usage: add a bit to this section |
| 2006-03-28 23:18 | Diff · History | -812 | →Scientific usage: rmv last paragraph and place on talk page until it can be examined and reassessed for potential value to this article, of which there seems to be some. |
| 2006-03-28 23:15 | Diff · History | -6 | →Empiricism and science: retitle section, pending a possible article on the specific term 'empirical' |
| 2006-03-28 23:14 | Diff · History | -33 | →Empiricism and science: minor corrections in first paragraph of Empiricism and science |
| 2006-03-28 23:12 | Diff · History | -124 | copyedit second introductory paragraph, rmv erroneous assertion that scientific method is based upon inductive rather than deductive logic, in fact for at least a century it has been both, and more. |
| 2006-03-28 23:08 | Diff · History | -1 | rmv stub on historiography and place in section on Variations, pending outcome of further discussion by other interested editors |
| 2006-03-28 23:05 | Diff · History | -6 | →Philosophical usage: rmv whitespace |
| 2006-03-28 23:05 | Diff · History | 9 | heart of -> fundamental requirement |
| 2006-03-28 23:03 | Diff · History | 77 | Begin a much needed reorganization and clarification of the content of this article; cleanup tag |
All times are in UTC.