Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Help:Archiving a talk page (Log · Page History) |
User | Gurch (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 16 |
Minor edits | 11 (68.8%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 6.8 |
Added (bytes)2 | 1,681 |
Deleted (bytes) | -1,787 |
Minor edits
·
11 (68.8%)
Major edits
·
5 (31.2%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
16 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
16 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2007-04-11 20:53 | Diff · History | 56 | Category:Wikipedia discussion archives |
2007-01-08 12:58 | Diff · History | 5 | →Cut and paste procedure: typo |
2007-01-08 12:57 | Diff · History | -19 | →Cut and paste procedure: {{atn}} has fewer links that {{archive nav}} (which I think is actually a good thing) |
2007-01-08 12:54 | Diff · History | -139 | →Cut and paste procedure: {{archive box}} and {{archivebox}} have been merged |
2007-01-01 13:45 | Diff · History | 312 | instructions are confusing when applied to user talk archives, reword. |
2006-12-24 12:38 | Diff · History | -12 | Refactoring is NOT an alternative to archiving. Eventually the page will be long enough to need archiving anyway, no amount of refactoring will solve that. Complementary, yes, but not an alternative. |
2006-12-24 12:35 | Diff · History | -144 | Get rid of the bit about the size limit. These days this affects essentially nobody, and the long page warning is now set at 70Kb for talk pages anyway. I've seen too many rediculously short archives. |
2006-12-24 12:29 | Diff · History | 99 | →Examples: there's a standard archive header template now ({{talkarchive}}), so no need to copy it off another page; give some useful examples instead. |
2006-12-24 12:22 | Diff · History | 488 | →Procedure: "Purists will note that the URL can be radically trimmed"? We might as well make this information useful. And who put server load in? That's rediculously negligible here. |
2006-12-24 12:14 | Diff · History | 39 | move "automated archival" to the end, and reword. it may be cut-and-paste but it's completely different from manual archiving methods, mainly since you're not meant to use it for article talk pages. |
2006-12-24 12:09 | Diff · History | 142 | →Subpage archive method: sentence from removed section |
2006-12-24 12:08 | Diff · History | -628 | →Controversy: remove, this is an instructional page, and it's hardly a "controversial" problem anyway. the only useful part is the bit saying stick to one method, which I'll put at the top. |
2006-12-24 12:06 | Diff · History | -845 | →Archive table: remove section, it only mentions one of the available templates and they're already mentioned in the procedure for archiving pages |
2006-12-24 12:03 | Diff · History | 494 | →Subpage archive method: rewrite |
2006-12-24 11:39 | Diff · History | 6 | →Subpage archive method: except there aren't 20, so don't link it |
2006-12-24 11:38 | Diff · History | 40 | make things a bit clearer |
All times are in UTC.