Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Talk:Harvard University (Log · Page History) |
| User | DC (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 24 |
| Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
| Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
| atbe1 | 0.5 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 10,308 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -1 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
24 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
24 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
24 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-09-12 00:54 | Diff · History | 291 | →Arbitrary break 3: re |
| 2010-09-12 00:52 | Diff · History | 381 | →Arbitrary break 3: |
| 2010-09-11 16:26 | Diff · History | 535 | →Arbitrary break 3: CMU was "prestigious" before Harvard |
| 2010-09-11 16:22 | Diff · History | 360 | →Arbitrary break 3: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/256300/Harvard-University |
| 2010-09-11 15:48 | Diff · History | 398 | →Arbitrary break 3: sources you provided for CMU aren't reliable |
| 2010-09-11 04:28 | Diff · History | 323 | →Arbitrary break 3: irrelevant |
| 2010-09-09 03:49 | Diff · History | 393 | →Arbitrary break II: re Mabeenot and make NYB's comment the start of arb brk 3 |
| 2010-09-08 21:24 | Diff · History | 733 | →Arbitrary break II: wasn't aimed at you |
| 2010-09-08 21:05 | Diff · History | 797 | →Arbitrary break II: |
| 2010-09-08 20:53 | Diff · History | 537 | →RfC: Is "Prestigious" an acceptable term to use in the Lead: notification posted at Wikiproject Boston and Wikiproject MA |
| 2010-09-08 20:02 | Diff · History | 249 | →Arbitrary break II: slippery-slope |
| 2010-09-08 15:45 | Diff · History | 1 | →RfC: Is "Prestigious" an acceptable term to use in the Lead: |
| 2010-09-08 15:44 | Diff · History | 640 | →RfC: Is "Prestigious" an acceptable term to use in the Lead: |
| 2010-09-08 02:00 | Diff · History | 326 | →RfC: Is "Prestigious" an acceptable term to use in the Lead: note |
| 2010-09-08 01:58 | Diff · History | 394 | →RfC: Is "Prestigious" an acceptable term to use in the Lead: new section |
| 2010-09-08 01:42 | Diff · History | -1 | →New lead (continued): |
| 2010-09-08 01:41 | Diff · History | 367 | replies |
| 2010-09-04 16:02 | Diff · History | 424 | →Redundancy: new section |
| 2010-09-01 07:19 | Diff · History | 246 | nom for Good Article review |
| 2010-09-01 00:32 | Diff · History | 655 | →New lead: |
| 2010-08-31 21:06 | Diff · History | 291 | →New lead: |
| 2010-08-31 20:57 | Diff · History | 789 | →New lead: some sources |
| 2010-08-31 19:56 | Diff · History | 2 | →New lead: ce myself (still violates WP:LEAD) |
| 2010-08-31 19:49 | Diff · History | 1,176 | →New lead: goes against WP:LEAD |
All times are in UTC.