Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Bitcoin (Log · Page History) |
| User | Aoidh (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 158 |
| Minor edits | 9 (5.7%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 65 (41.1%) |
| Reverted edits | 23 (14.6%) |
| atbe1 | 25.3 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 18,065 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -22,887 |
Minor edits
·
9 (5.7%)
Major edits
·
149 (94.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
65 (41.1%)
Manual edits
·
93 (58.9%)
Reverted edits
·
23 (14.6%)
Unreverted edits
·
135 (85.4%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 19:24 | Diff · History | -1,974 | I'm going to be WP:BOLD here and remove this, because the rough consensus on the talk page seems to be very clear that this is WP:UNDUE for the lede. I would welcome anyone who disagrees to discuss it on the talk page and help come to a consensus regarding this. |
| 2021-08-09 20:03 | Diff · History | -4 | Per talk |
| 2021-08-09 02:05 | Diff · History | -56 | →Wallets: Per talk |
| 2017-08-25 02:50 | Diff · History | -16 | Cleanup per WP:SEEALSO |
| 2017-08-25 02:49 | Diff · History | 2,777 | →Economics: Rv; given the number of RfCs and discussions on this topic on this page, it should be discussed before removed from this article into an obscure subarticle. |
| 2016-12-08 19:15 | Diff · History | -643 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Rv to previous consensus version. |
| 2016-12-08 19:14 | Diff · History | 1 | Undid revision 753639082 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) Do not reintroduce a typo into the article just because you opened an RfC. |
| 2016-12-08 09:10 | Diff · History | 1 | (reverted) →Ponzi scheme concerns: typo |
| 2016-12-07 11:03 | Diff · History | 429 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Restoring neutral, consensus version. The version I reverted tries to downplay it and make it seem as if only seven people have these concerns. |
| 2016-11-18 01:37 | Diff · History | 641 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Unexplained removal |
| 2016-10-07 03:36 | Diff · History | →Ponzi scheme concerns: I was wrong, the source does support this content. | |
| 2016-10-05 13:54 | Diff · History | →Ponzi scheme concerns: typo | |
| 2016-10-05 13:53 | Diff · History | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Read the source. It was not The Central Bank itself. It was someone who worked there, who was not speaking in an official capacity on behalf of the bank. Wording it as you did gives it more authority. | |
| 2016-08-08 13:37 | Diff · History | 397 | Undid revision 733448845 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) If the issue is that "more notable thefts" are not mentioned, then mention them. This is sourced and notable. |
| 2016-05-23 04:56 | Diff · History | 3,379 | Undid revision 721640151 by Aoidh (talk) Reverting my edit |
| 2016-05-23 04:55 | Diff · History | -3,379 | (reverted) →Ponzi scheme concerns: Test edit for discussion, will self-revert. |
| 2016-05-23 04:43 | Diff · History | 266 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Changed to "economists" with source |
| 2016-05-23 04:38 | Diff · History | -30 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: Changed "the head of the Estonian central bank" to "bankers". He is not the head of the Estonian central bank. |
| 2016-05-23 00:58 | Diff · History | -59 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Waited a few days to see if there were any objections. Making changes per talk page discussions. |
| 2016-05-17 09:20 | Diff · History | -3 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Restoring RfC version per talk. |
| 2016-05-16 23:30 | Diff · History | -6 | →Ponzi scheme concerns: reword |
| 2016-05-16 21:02 | Diff · History | 1 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Changing section header from "Ponzi scheme dispute" to "Ponzi scheme concerns". There's not really a dispute so much as concerns. |
| 2016-05-16 21:01 | Diff · History | -948 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Removing unnecessary articles and keeping those with weight (banks and such) that show that their conclusion is that bitcoin is not a ponzi scheme. |
| 2016-05-16 20:59 | Diff · History | 45 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: context |
| 2016-05-16 20:58 | Diff · History | -205 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Weird how a law professor was removed, but an opinion piece from the Huffington Post was kept. |
| 2016-05-16 20:56 | Diff · History | -68 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Hardly POV, given that it lists reasons why it could or could not be. |
| 2016-05-16 20:54 | Diff · History | -3 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: As per before, when this was discussed. |
| 2016-04-25 21:30 | Diff · History | -188 | Undid revision 717124087 by Vatadoshu (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2015-12-30 02:20 | Diff · History | 2 | wording |
| 2015-12-30 02:12 | Diff · History | -64 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Restoring; changing it this way makes no sense in terms of flow. |
| 2015-02-23 17:10 | Diff · History | -795 | Reverted to revision 648479663 by Aoidh: Consensus is not required to remove content you just added; see WP:BRD and WP:STATUSQUO. Consensus *is* required for you to reinsert it. Use the talk page, get a consensus, and *then* reinsert it. ([[WP... |
| 2015-02-23 14:21 | Diff · History | -1,326 | (reverted) Reverting per WP:STATUSQUO. Regardless of the reliability of the source, that much text being copy-pasted from a source like that violates WP:COPYQUOTE and WP:NFCCP #3. Get a consensus before reinserting this material. See talk page. |
| 2015-02-16 15:26 | Diff · History | -10 | (reverted) Undid revision 647404679 by Kraainem (talk) Read WP:TERRORIST, Wikipedia's voice is never used to describe anyone as such, period. |
| 2015-02-16 14:36 | Diff · History | 4 | →Terrorist financing: Actually it needs to meet WP:TERRORIST. |
| 2015-02-16 14:35 | Diff · History | -14 | Undid revision 647398139 by Kraainem (talk) "Groups such as" specifically means it's not limited to that one group. The title MUST reflect the text, and your title does not. |
| 2015-02-16 14:03 | Diff · History | -14 | (reverted) Undid revision 647397275 by Kraainem (talk) The text itself shows it is not limited to this one group. This isn't a news article, sections don't need sensationalist titles. |
| 2015-02-16 13:54 | Diff · History | -6 | →CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: I'm not saying this section does or does not belong here, but having it in caps and bolded is pointless and dramatic and inappropriate for a Wikipedia article |
| 2015-02-16 13:53 | Diff · History | -27 | →Criminal activity: WP:TERRORIST |
| 2015-01-08 07:10 | Diff · History | 545 | Undid revision 641307588 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) Calling something "non-neutral" does not make it so. There are serious issues with your edit, which is why I reverted it. |
| 2015-01-06 08:27 | Diff · History | -23 | →See also: Removing virtual currency per WP:SEEALSO since it's already wikilinked in the lede |
| 2015-01-06 08:26 | Diff · History | -10 | Wikilinking digital currency in the lede so it can be removed from the See also section per WP:SEEALSO |
| 2015-01-06 08:19 | Diff · History | 1,402 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Restoring consensus version,as this change gave the section zero context. |
| 2014-12-02 07:48 | Diff · History | -628 | Undid revision 636244485 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) The wording was determined by consensus, which you took part in. It is the WP:STATUSQUO. |
| 2014-12-02 00:11 | Diff · History | -628 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 636205775 by ClueBot NG: You having the *opinion* that it's WP:NPOV does not make it so. Reverting per WP:STATUSQUO. Discuss and get a consensus before changing this, as this version was make by consensus on talk. ([[WP:TW|... |
| 2014-11-29 07:12 | Diff · History | -275 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Shortening quote per WP:NFCC |
| 2014-11-29 07:11 | Diff · History | -730 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Restoring original version per WP:BRD. It makes no sense to include these names per WP:NPOV, especially given the sources themselves. |
| 2014-11-28 10:03 | Diff · History | 9 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: You can't translate something yourself and use it as a definitive quote. |
| 2014-11-28 10:02 | Diff · History | -621 | →Ponzi scheme dispute: Removing opinion blogs and reflecting what the sources say and per WP:STATUSQUO. |
| 2014-11-28 09:57 | Diff · History | -116 | Reverted to revision 635751852 by Ladislav Mecir (talk): WP:ELNO. (TW) |
| 2014-10-30 22:38 | Diff · History | -2 | →Selfish mining: fix typo |
| 2014-10-30 22:38 | Diff · History | -54 | →Ponzi scheme: Without the context of the rest of the section, this sentence makes no sense and has no purpose. |
| 2014-10-08 22:18 | Diff · History | 673 | (reverted) Undid revision 628777898 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) This doesn't appear to be a "duplicate" of anything in the article. |
| 2014-08-24 09:26 | Diff · History | -42 | Undid revision 622578938 by Sysuwxm (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2014-08-12 07:20 | Diff · History | -23 | Undid revision 620871941 by Emisanle (talk) That doesn't need to be in the see also section per WP:SEEALSO; it's already in the lede. |
| 2014-07-13 22:19 | Diff · History | 189 | Undid revision 616836182 by Homni (talk) It's reliably sourced, That "No-one specifically said they agree with this edit" doesn't mean it can be removed just because it's unwanted. |
| 2014-07-13 21:12 | Diff · History | -58 | →External links: WP:ELNO |
| 2014-07-12 02:17 | Diff · History | -58 | Rv; this is already found at the DMOZ link |
| 2014-07-05 07:52 | Diff · History | -72 | Undid revision 615664233 by 108.41.133.173 (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2014-07-02 22:02 | Diff · History | 197 | →Ponzi scheme: Adding another source showing that Roubini was talking about ponzi scheme. (edited with ProveIt) |
| 2014-07-02 21:53 | Diff · History | -204 | Don't revert it back to your version, if you're going to revert it back, use the previous version per WP:STATUSQUO. At any rate, however, you're the only one who has an issue with this version, and your rationale is based on a misunderstanding. |
| 2014-07-01 19:02 | Diff · History | -93 | →Ponzi scheme: Rm tag I added, as the sources support this wording. |
| 2014-07-01 18:32 | Diff · History | -26 | All of the sources show this, whether it is "only a little more than" or "nothing more than" is ultimately irrelevant, so this avoids this issue altogether. |
| 2014-07-01 06:21 | Diff · History | 93 | →Ponzi scheme: User:Ladislav Mecir's edit is not verified by any of the sources given. See talk page discussion. |
| 2014-07-01 05:29 | Diff · History | -8 | (reverted) Undid revision 615113429 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) It cites the sources, the wording you changed it to doesn't reflect the sources cited. Get a consensus if you want to change this. |
| 2014-07-01 02:16 | Diff · History | -67 | →See also: Remove wikilinks from "See also" that are already in the article per WP:SEEALSO |
| 2014-07-01 02:14 | Diff · History | -8 | Rv, quoting a single source but attributing all the sources to the quote give the appearance that all the sources are quoted as saying this or have this exact opinion. This is not the case. |
| 2014-06-27 01:43 | Diff · History | -162 | →External links: Cleanup; this is what the DMOZ link is for per WP:SPAM |
| 2014-06-20 21:57 | Diff · History | -157 | Undid revision 613740229 by Anotherusername1 (talk) That needs a source showing that it is "in the media" |
| 2014-06-17 19:51 | Diff · History | -87 | Undid revision 613288194 by Julia Eremina (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2014-06-08 18:19 | Diff · History | 0 | →Ponzi scheme: reflecting quote |
| 2014-06-08 18:17 | Diff · History | -61 | →Ponzi scheme: Rm unsourced |
| 2014-03-30 05:09 | Diff · History | -792 | Rv; the consensus on the talk page was completely against adding this here. |
| 2014-03-23 10:49 | Diff · History | -25 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 600856967 by Aoidh (talk): This edit has numerous problems that are being discussed on the talk page. Get a consensus, or you'll be reported for edit-warring. (TW) |
| 2014-03-23 10:17 | Diff · History | -25 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 600806579 by Ging287 (talk): And again per talk. Waiting a few days to make this same edit isn't going to make this suddenly appropriate all of a sudden. (TW) |
| 2014-03-20 02:18 | Diff · History | -5 | Reverted to revision 600391215 by Aoidh (talk): Not even close to what was discussed on the talk page. Do not restore this without discussion. (TW) |
| 2014-03-20 01:23 | Diff · History | 0 | →Ponzi scheme: Per talk page and sources. |
| 2014-03-18 19:56 | Diff · History | 1 | Undid revision 600204538 by Aoidh (talk) Temporary self-revert until some form of response is given, but short of any rationale supported by sources this will not remain in the article. |
| 2014-03-18 19:53 | Diff · History | -1 | (reverted) Restoring per talk.and WP:BRD. |
| 2014-03-18 03:15 | Diff · History | -23 | Clarifying last edit summary; the discussion LM refers to was not for this edit in any way, and I have replied on the talk page explaining why the edit was reverted. Per WP:STATUSQUO and WP:BRD, the edit is removed until a consensus is found. |
| 2014-03-18 03:14 | Diff · History | 23 | (reverted) Reverted edits by Aoidh (talk) to last version by Ladislav Mecir |
| 2014-03-18 03:09 | Diff · History | -23 | (reverted) Undid revision 600104800 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) It actually works the other way around. Reverting per WP:STATUSQUO. This was not discussed in any way on the talk page. |
| 2014-03-17 23:19 | Diff · History | -23 | (reverted) Undid revision 600054331 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) Read it again, there is no "proposal" for this edit, only one marginally related to it. |
| 2014-03-17 15:21 | Diff · History | -23 | →Criminal activity: There is no such discussion, and regardless there is opposition *now*, so get a consensus for this. |
| 2014-03-14 12:09 | Diff · History | -23 | →Criminal activity: I don't see any discussion about this, the discussion was about the section "Criminal activity" as a whole, AFAIK. |
| 2014-03-11 11:21 | Diff · History | -774 | Undid revision 599117350 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) You seem to be mistaken, "Legal issues" is a completely different section. See talk page. |
| 2014-03-11 11:06 | Diff · History | -774 | (reverted) Undid revision 599116336 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) The information is not supported by the source. It's WP:SYNTH to put that there when the source makes zero mention of ponzi. |
| 2014-03-11 09:47 | Diff · History | -774 | (reverted) →Ponzi scheme: Again, that source says nothing about ponzi schemes and is about the legality which is covered in another section. |
| 2014-03-02 19:11 | Diff · History | 258 | →Ponzi scheme: Restoring references. |
| 2014-02-21 20:38 | Diff · History | 277 | →Ponzi scheme: Restoring reference |
| 2014-02-17 05:55 | Diff · History | 53 | Restore wording and source; the ECB doesn't say it "hesitates" |
| 2014-02-14 23:21 | Diff · History | -126 | Undid revision 595435708 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) It is WP:OR, the source doesn't say this. Hence, it doesn't belong. |
| 2014-02-14 09:09 | Diff · History | -126 | (reverted) Undid revision 595421971 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) That's a big stretch, seems like WP:OR especially given the context. |
| 2014-02-14 07:46 | Diff · History | -59 | →Legal issues and status: Revert; the source doesn't appear to support this. Did you mean to use a different reference? |
| 2014-02-13 12:08 | Diff · History | -1 | →Legal issues and status: Fix bracket |
| 2014-02-13 11:56 | Diff · History | 301 | →Legal issues and status: Trying to reinsert "opposing view" |
| 2014-02-13 11:52 | Diff · History | -945 | →Legal issues and status: Rv; if that does go in the article it needs to be reworded to make sense, and the cherry-picking of the ECB quote isn't a viable option. Also removing archive.is per Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC |
| 2014-02-01 13:49 | Diff · History | -11 | →Legal issues and status: wording |
| 2014-01-31 11:14 | Diff · History | 843 | Restoring per consensus and concerns noted at WP:DRN. It is not a "historical" concern as noted by the sources noted on the talk page dated as recently as a few days ago. |
| 2014-01-28 13:06 | Diff · History | 12 | →Legal issues and status: Selectively quoting *half* a sentence out of context is hardly appropriate. |
| 2014-01-28 12:34 | Diff · History | 135 | (reverted) Undid revision 592784675 by Ladislav Mecir (talk) You're the one that added this, now is the time to stop and discuss. Or we can take it back to the consensus version. |
| 2014-01-28 12:24 | Diff · History | -24 | Reflecting what the sources say per consensus and the talk page discussion. |
| 2014-01-28 11:34 | Diff · History | -3 | →Legal issues and status: "mentions" to "notes" |
| 2014-01-28 11:34 | Diff · History | -101 | →Legal issues and status: If you're going to cite conciseness, do so fully. |
| 2014-01-28 03:55 | Diff · History | -80 | →Legal issues and status: Restoring consensus version; see talk. |
| 2014-01-28 03:51 | Diff · History | 57 | →Legal issues and status: Page 27. Without that wording the rest of the sentence doesn't make sense, nor does it reflect the report by only giving the "positive" finding. |
| 2014-01-28 01:04 | Diff · History | -6 | →Economics: rewording |
| 2014-01-28 01:02 | Diff · History | -8 | →Legal issues and status: fmt |
| 2014-01-28 01:01 | Diff · History | 1,229 | →Legal issues and status: Reinserting ponzi scheme information; this was inserted with a large amount of discussion and consensus. |
| 2013-03-11 17:36 | Diff · History | 97 | Undid revision 543459106 by SudoGhost (talk) Sorry, didn't mean to do that there. |
| 2013-03-11 17:34 | Diff · History | -97 | (reverted) →As an investment: Not in source given. |
| 2013-03-09 15:11 | Diff · History | 1 | A > an per talk |
| 2013-02-25 07:46 | Diff · History | -285 | The content might belong here, but not one uploaded to Scribd, since that content is user-generated; there's nothing stopping someone from modifying a document and then uploading it. A copy of the Barok work should be found at a reliable location. |
| 2013-01-20 19:10 | Diff · History | -152 | External links don't belong in the body of the article && removed pointless trivia. |
| 2013-01-10 13:12 | Diff · History | -1 | →As an investment: Changing wording back to "describes itself", it's more useful to note *who* is describing it as such, rather than some hypothetical "it can be described". Also restoring case. |
| 2012-12-26 23:44 | Diff · History | 11 | Undid revision 529891727 by Play Money for Dummies (talk) The link is hardly promotional, given the article's subject. |
| 2012-10-28 04:54 | Diff · History | -1,003 | (reverted) Reverted to revision 520195963 by HowardStrong: These are the same sources you inserted before, it needs a reliable third-party source to verify that sort of claim. Please discuss on talk if you disagree, but don't reinsert it.. (TW) |
| 2012-10-28 01:03 | Diff · History | 17 | Adding peer-to-peer per HS's reference |
| 2012-10-28 01:02 | Diff · History | 11 | Adding electronic currency, per talk page |
| 2012-10-27 23:26 | Diff · History | -417 | Reverted to revision 520181379 by Zntrip: Still a primary source, please discuss on the talk page.. (TW) |
| 2012-10-27 23:11 | Diff · History | -223 | Reverted to revision 520180323 by Your Lord and Master: Doesn't appear to be a reliable source, needs a third-party source. Please discuss on talk.. (TW) |
| 2012-10-21 03:26 | Diff · History | -41 | →External links: I don't know what that link it, but it looks more spammy than useful. Please discuss before reinserting. |
| 2012-10-18 19:11 | Diff · History | 987 | Reverted to revision 518557241 by Another John S: Reverting unexplained deletion. These external links have been discussed on the talk page, the consensus was to include them. These are also not minor edits.. (TW) |
| 2012-08-23 19:46 | Diff · History | -19 | Undid revision 508823610 by 98.221.219.51 (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2012-07-16 07:34 | Diff · History | -96 | Undid revision 502580964 by Nonnompow (talk) WP:ELNO, neither of these are even about Bitcoin. |
| 2012-07-13 21:00 | Diff · History | 35 | Undid revision 502102881 by Pmsyyz (talk) It's still fairly technical, and the wording hasn't really changed since that tag has been discussed |
| 2012-07-10 03:59 | Diff · History | 0 | Undid revision 501501825 by 71.60.118.86 (talk) Do not change this intentionally invalid address. Address chosen by consensus (see Talk:Bitcoin). |
| 2012-07-08 18:02 | Diff · History | -15 | Undid revision 501245473 by MrAndreessen (talk) Article was speedy deleted |
| 2012-07-02 18:07 | Diff · History | 528 | Undid revision 500345246 by SudoGhost (talk) Either way these need to be cleaned up, they should be discussed first, I think. This is an article, not a "useful directory", DMOZ is for that. |
| 2012-07-02 15:51 | Diff · History | -528 | (reverted) →External links: Since I have no doubt you intend to continue to spam your website in adfinitum, there's no point in cleaning up any of this. |
| 2012-07-02 15:44 | Diff · History | -229 | Rv external link spamming. It is vandalism and will be reverted. Establish a consensus for inclusion. WP:SPAM#Dealing with spam replaces *all the links*, not *all the links except for spammed links* |
| 2012-07-01 03:36 | Diff · History | -4 | Spacing and order |
| 2012-07-01 03:33 | Diff · History | 850 | →External links: Add editing note about links |
| 2012-07-01 02:58 | Diff · History | 44 | →External links: Fixing external link per WP:STATUSQUO and talk page. |
| 2012-06-30 15:59 | Diff · History | -71 | Undid revision 500032572 by FrankAndProust (talk) Rv spam. Do not reinsert. |
| 2012-06-30 08:07 | Diff · History | -71 | (reverted) Disagree, this is one of several such sites, there's no reason to list just this one. You want the site on here, put it on DMOZ, which is linked here. |
| 2012-06-30 01:20 | Diff · History | -281 | →External links: Replacing links that fail WP:ELNO with {{dmoz}}, per Wikipedia:SPAM#Dealing with spam. |
| 2012-06-25 13:17 | Diff · History | -59 | Undid revision 499279612 by 195.221.139.124 (talk) A wiki is not a reliable source |
| 2012-06-05 14:29 | Diff · History | -1,744 | Reverted to revision 495992050 by FrankAndProust: "a shifted geometric distribution with probability 0.19" without context, is meaningless. Also, a wiki is not typically a reliable source. Please discuss on talk.. (TW) |
| 2012-05-28 10:04 | Diff · History | -413 | Undid revision 494755071 by TobyGoodwin (talk) Chat logs are not reliable sources |
| 2012-05-17 03:05 | Diff · History | 1 | →Inventor: > Developer |
| 2012-04-09 17:04 | Diff · History | 80 | Undid revision 486455477 by Diablo-D3 (talk) Neither inappropriate, nor abuse. Discussion is ongoing on the talk page. |
| 2012-04-05 14:18 | Diff · History | -5,437 | Undid revision 485721702 by Cloudswrest (talk) WP:V, WP:RS, WP:WEIGHT, WP:NPOV. Now tell me it's vandalism. |
| 2012-04-05 12:26 | Diff · History | -5,437 | (reverted) Undid revision 485703174 by FrankAndProust (talk) WP:BRD, the content does seem a bit like a sales pitch. |
| 2012-03-08 23:06 | Diff · History | -37 | Undid revision 480907514 by 92.20.146.86 (talk) Unsourced change |
| 2012-02-16 09:44 | Diff · History | -264 | Undid revision 477152606 by 85.181.138.29 (talk) See Talk:List of distributed computing projects |
| 2012-02-14 21:00 | Diff · History | -204 | Reverted edits by 136.152.140.102 (talk) to last version by SudoGhost |
| 2012-02-13 23:44 | Diff · History | -264 | Undid revision 476667976 by 92.228.60.82 (talk) Not in source given. |
| 2012-02-13 08:48 | Diff · History | -480 | Reverted to revision 476211850 by Blue Matt: None of these are reliable sources, this should be discussed first.. (TW) |
| 2012-01-21 18:07 | Diff · History | -122 | Undid revision 472461031 by Celosia (talk) Unsourced |
| 2012-01-17 14:10 | Diff · History | -86 | Undid revision 471864951 by M.qrius (talk) WP:ELNO |
| 2012-01-14 01:02 | Diff · History | 0 | Undid revision 471237946 by 67.136.217.98 (talk) |
| 2011-10-18 09:34 | Diff · History | -1 | Undid revision 456153326 by 50.46.129.40 (talk) No. |
| 2011-10-18 08:38 | Diff · History | -77 | Undid revision 456147168 by 66.91.255.161 (talk) Unsourced. |
| 2011-09-30 12:47 | Diff · History | 1,092 | Undid revision 453162997 by 50.82.74.147 (talk) Then be bold and do it. |
| 2011-08-22 17:29 | Diff · History | -1 | Undid revision 446180614 by 78.88.117.116 (talk) It can be sped up, it cannot be speed up. |
| 2011-08-22 13:54 | Diff · History | -112 | Undid revision 446150293 by 173.238.232.237 (talk) Wikis are not used as sources |
| 2011-07-25 01:07 | Diff · History | -62 | Reverted edits by 166.135.118.26 (talk) to last version by The Frenchie |
| 2011-07-24 06:05 | Diff · History | 903 | Undid revision 441125179 by 117.197.241.196 (talk) Unexplained removal of sourced content |
All times are in UTC.