Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | User talk:LessHeard vanU (Log · Page History) |
User | ATren (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 27 |
Minor edits | 1 (3.7%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 0 (0%) |
Reverted edits | 0 (0%) |
atbe1 | 7.8 |
Added (bytes)2 | 10,924 |
Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
1 (3.7%)
Major edits
·
26 (96.3%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
0 (0%)
Manual edits
·
27 (100%)
Reverted edits
·
0 (0%)
Unreverted edits
·
27 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2010-10-13 01:14 | Diff · History | 575 | →Yes, absolutely: new section |
2010-05-29 01:35 | Diff · History | 457 | →Lar banned from WMC: new section |
2010-05-17 00:47 | Diff · History | 182 | →Disappointed: apologies, I misunderstood. Perhaps then you could give us your opinion on those reverts? |
2010-05-17 00:34 | Diff · History | 190 | →Disappointed: OK, but you're defending them, so why do you think they are good? |
2010-05-17 00:17 | Diff · History | 555 | →Disappointed: see also the blog comments where Bauder criticized both WMC and the edits |
2010-05-17 00:07 | Diff · History | 738 | →Disappointed: elighten me |
2010-05-16 23:55 | Diff · History | 492 | →Disappointed: Yes |
2010-05-16 23:47 | Diff · History | 336 | →Disappointed: Bag-o-glass |
2010-05-16 23:01 | Diff · History | 605 | →Disappointed: re |
2010-05-16 22:52 | Diff · History | 413 | →Disappointed: what about the climate emails scientists who got extensive coverage in the context of the Climategate affair? |
2010-05-16 22:46 | Diff · History | 481 | →Disappointed: interesting |
2010-05-16 18:53 | Diff · History | 70 | →Disappointed: add |
2010-05-16 18:52 | Diff · History | 148 | →Disappointed: not worthy of response |
2010-05-13 14:59 | Diff · History | 1,279 | →Some thoughts: take it for what it's worth |
2010-05-13 13:39 | Diff · History | 0 | →Some thoughts: typo |
2010-05-13 13:38 | Diff · History | 1,358 | →Some thoughts: a friendly nudge |
2010-05-12 18:02 | Diff · History | 91 | →Some thoughts: exactly |
2010-05-12 17:29 | Diff · History | 787 | →Some thoughts: agree with SV |
2010-05-07 00:20 | Diff · History | 258 | →Blog: perhaps a little Wikipedia history lesson is needed here. :-) |
2010-04-21 13:12 | Diff · History | 109 | →Advice Required: I did |
2010-04-21 11:36 | Diff · History | 105 | →Advice Required: seconded |
2010-04-04 16:44 | Diff · History | 106 | →Wikibreak: condolence |
2010-04-03 23:57 | Diff · History | 202 | →Discretion: quite the opposite, I think |
2010-04-03 20:29 | Diff · History | 693 | →WMC: BozMo, the evidence has been there for several days, from the Marknutley request |
2010-03-17 23:05 | Diff · History | 387 | →Completely random question: thanks ;-) |
2010-03-17 22:10 | Diff · History | 156 | →Completely random question: shamelessly allowing my curiosity to get the better of me.... |
2010-03-17 15:45 | Diff · History | 151 | →Completely random question: new section |
All times are in UTC.