Back
93.96.148.42
•
Talk:Penis
•
en.wikipedia.org
Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
Page | Talk:Penis (Log · Page History) |
User | 93.96.148.42 (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
Total edits | 24 |
Minor edits | 0 (0%) |
(Semi-)automated edits | 1 (4.2%) |
Reverted edits | 1 (4.2%) |
atbe1 | 1.2 |
Added (bytes)2 | 7,683 |
Deleted (bytes) | 0 |
Minor edits
·
0 (0%)
Major edits
·
24 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
1 (4.2%)
Manual edits
·
23 (95.8%)
Reverted edits
·
1 (4.2%)
Unreverted edits
·
23 (95.8%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-09 02:38 | Diff · History | 37 | (reverted) →Gallery: Human- why this one - shaved, bad foto.... |
2012-07-21 21:41 | Diff · History | 194 | →Possible solution to end the edit warring: :And lets ditch the bottled whale penes - what exactly do they add to the article?~~~~ |
2012-07-21 10:48 | Diff · History | 174 | →Possible solution to end the edit warring: :::And functions, such as erection, ejaculation, and urination.~~~~ |
2012-07-21 00:31 | Diff · History | 724 | Undid revision 503345962 by MistyMorn (talk)Restoring my suggestions. There is currently no picture of urination in the article, and no proper mention of it either. |
2012-07-20 21:18 | Diff · History | 83 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: re added foto - but at 18 pixels - hope is ok, if not, present as a filename - dont know how to do |
2012-07-20 21:14 | Diff · History | 191 | →Possible solution to end the edit warring: :I can't understand your grammar MistyMorn. Please rephrase.~~~~ |
2012-07-20 21:12 | Diff · History | 631 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: |
2012-07-20 20:47 | Diff · History | 1,626 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: I would like to request that WP:IMAGE RELEVANCE be given due attention, in particular the following passages - <blockquote>Images are primarily meant to inform readers by providing vi |
2012-07-20 20:11 | Diff · History | 22 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: |
2012-07-20 19:49 | Diff · History | 235 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: :::::::::If you do not want to see the image under discussion, please look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOSEE ~~~~ |
2012-07-20 19:41 | Diff · History | 218 | →Possible solution to end the edit warring: ::Yes - such as the image above to illustrate urination - which currently does not feature in the article.~~~~ |
2012-07-20 19:40 | Diff · History | 815 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: :::::::I added 2 photos of a man and a woman urinating to Urination - if that is spamming, please explain what constructive editing consists of. Please also explain why you removed th |
2012-07-20 19:00 | Diff · History | 256 | ::::I would like to add that urination is currently only mentioned in the lede - surely it is important enough to be mentioned in the body text.~~~~ |
2012-07-20 18:57 | Diff · History | 284 | *'''Yes''' This article is currently extremely short. Consensus seems to be in favour. There is plenty of room for human penes to be briefly covered, with an illustration. ~~~~ |
2012-07-20 18:52 | Diff · History | 165 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: MistyMorn I don't understand your contribution. Do you think this image pertinently illustrates the encyclopedic content of the penis article? |
2012-07-20 18:21 | Diff · History | 32 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: please summarise why a human penis should not be if good images of other penes are not available |
2012-07-20 18:13 | Diff · History | 1 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: thumb |
2012-07-20 18:12 | Diff · History | 656 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: :It is NOT explained clearly- I do not understand it, and from the above others do not understand it -please summarise why a human penis should not be if used images of other penes are no |
2012-07-20 04:08 | Diff · History | 229 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: ::::::There are a LOT of proper photos at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Penis|commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Penis.~~~~ |
2012-07-20 04:02 | Diff · History | 339 | ::::::Please explain what is meant by "too "fearsome"". The image of a flacid human penis would seem far better than pickled whale penes- which look a little scary to me. It quite clearly says at the top of this page that wikipedia is not censored, a |
2012-07-13 11:44 | Diff · History | 286 | →Add a live mammal's penis photo in the "Mammals" section: :::There are more good examples on the German penis page which I would suggest adding - at the moment is sadly lacking in pictures - as though had been censored or something.~~~~ |
2012-07-13 11:43 | Diff · History | 214 | →RfC: Does the human penis belong in this article?: |
2012-07-12 01:51 | Diff · History | 1 | →RfC: Does the human penis belong in this article?: |
2012-07-12 01:51 | Diff · History | 307 | →wikilink: ==RfC: Does the human penis belong in this article?== {rfc|sci|media}} Should this article mention the human penis, or should it just link to Human penis and make no reference to it at all?~~~~ |
All times are in UTC.