Eisspeedway

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Statistics

Main page Talk page Members Templates Resources

Probability paradoxes or counter-intuitive problems

I published an article in Chance ( https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/N2ZHDVNZTCGQBQWTN5ZQ/full?target=10.1080/09332480.2024.2415844) citing flawed reasoning in these types of problems: they ask for the probability of an outome of an event that has occurred but answer with the probability of that outcome before the event has occurred. I edited Bertrand's box paradox - Wikipedia with the correct answer. But since the correct answer contradicts a history of the classical answer, my editing violates the Wikipedia:Verifiability#Exceptional claims require exceptional sourcing. How do I address that (if possible0 to correct what's currently in Wikipedia?

Thank you for any help. Kicab (talk) 16:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kicab, I think you changed the problem, hence got a different answer. See the Bertrand Box article talk page. Richard Gill (talk) 11:43, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Planetary impact image

I have raised a dispute about the factual accuracy of an image (or more precisely its caption) used in a number of places. Please consider commenting at talk:Torino scale#Normal distribution. --Trovatore (talk) 21:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Confidence interval

I’ve tried to improve the opening passages of Confidence interval. I hope I succeeded. Richard Gill (talk) 10:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've relisted an RFC at Talk:Coefficient_of_relationship#RFC:_Should_this_article_have_a_table_such_as_the_one_at_Coefficient_of_relationship#Human_relationships? which didn't receive any fresh participants last time around. Mentioning here since this Wikiproject is listed on the article's talk page. Your comments there would be greatly appreciated. - MrOllie (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]