This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / European / German This page is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force European military history task force German military history task force Ships This page is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips Germany This page is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany

I briefly suggested the idea of moving around the items so the Hindenberg would be in line with it's parent article. That was shot down to keep them ordered chronologically. What about just shifting the Hindenberg anyways, and just having not perfectly balanced columns (but at least not having a randomly outdented article to start a column). Staxringold _talk^contribs 17:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think I prefer having the columns the same length myself. The intent of the outdented Hindenburg seems clear to me - rst20xx (talk) 17:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]