Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pastorwayne

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pastorwayne}}
to the checkuser page . Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

More suspected socks of indefblocked Pastorwayne; previous checkuser noted one account as "likely" sock. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Likely. Pastorwayne = BikeRider3. Possible this is ValleyForge1979. Voice-of-All 02:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More

More suspected socks of indefblocked Pastorwayne, with same editing pattern. I didn't list them before because I thought (apparently mistakenly) that checkuser should not be used on IPs. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated. Voice-of-All 07:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question for clarity: Unrelated because the account User:Pastorwayne never signed in using one of those IP adresses? or is there some other factor dis-uniting them? - jc37 05:29, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And for further clarity. Are these ips connected to any of the other characters here? (OfficePuter, BikeRider, ValleyForge?) Or in Ohio, where PastorWayne is? -- roundhouse0 16:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pastorwayne was indefinitely blocked in June, after about 9 months of efforts by various editors to persuade him to refrain from a variety of forms of disruptive editing, particularly his creation of masses of categories (often dozens per day). OfficePuter (talk · contribs) shows an almost identical editing pattern and style, and appears to be an attempt at block evasion. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 09:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Likely. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.