The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The OG of the OC → Vicki Gunvalson  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• OG of the OC → Vicki Gunvalson  (talk ·links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Redirect not mentioned on the target page, and searching "OG of the OC" on Google doesn't bring up Vicki (at least on mind end), but other things do. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I added the redirect because that was the nickname given to Vicki Gunvalson as she was the longest-serving original cast member of the The Real Housewives of Orange County. OG refers to her status as an original castmate; OC refers to the setting of the show. Capricornsgroove (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as WP:NOR per creator if no source can be presented. Respublik (talk) 20:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will mention that i did find some sources, but the term seems to just be thrown around to whoever writers like (see here i think), though vicki still gets mentioned with that title 60-ish% of the time. while that at least alleviates the issue of an unsuspecting reader (or me) thinking that's supposed to stand for "original of the original character", i'm not entirely sure that if the sources happen to be usable, the series' article wouldn't be a better target. in case of doubt, i'll leave it to someone who knows what a rhoc is to find out where a mention could be added and not vote otherwise. same applies to the above, though i really think they should just be clumped together cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 11:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clumped them together. Jay 💬 11:26, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Chosen Warrior (Mortal Kombat) → Characters of the Mortal Kombat series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Chosen warriors → Characters of the Mortal Kombat series  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not sure what the best path forward is with these redirects. For one, the phrase "chosen warrior" is mentioned at least once in the target article, but not necessarily in a way that defines the term to better understand what potential subtopics the term excludes ... meaning readers will probably not find what they are looking for with these redirects. In addition, searching "chosen warrior(s)" on third party search engines returns results for potentially-notable topics that have no connection to the Mortal Kombat series. Also, the article Mortal Kombat does not mention "chosen warrior". Chosen Warrior does not exist, Chosen warrior existed but was apparently deleted in 2006 in a method that is now out-of-process and would be reverted (deleted due to being a double redirect) by an admin/editor who hasn't edited since 2009, and Chosen Warrior (Mortal Kombat) is a {{R with history}} due to being subject to a WP:BLAR in 2006; the history of the article seems to hint that this subject refers to a group of protagonist-like characters in the Mortal Kombat series ... but no article seems to currently define the term in a way which could be helpful to readers ... Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as vague. Technically it's Chosen One not Chosen Warrior. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Taste#Metallicness. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Metallic taste → Dysgeusia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Might also refer to Taste#Metallicness. 1234qwer1234qwer4 21:13, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Dabify. I'm not sure which one can be considered as a primary target --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Taste#Metallicness which is more general, and links to Dysgeusia. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Taste#Metallicness per Shhh, best article we have for "Metallic taste" BugGhost🦗👻 18:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Travis Scott (The Sims character) → The Sims 4  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, leaving readers attempting to find information about the subject of this redirect with nothing. Steel1943 (talk) 21:03, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:07, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• More-is-less paradox → Monotonicity criterion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention at the target. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Now mentioned at target – without a source yet, but one exists. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:12, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Less-is-more paradox → Monotonicity criterion  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Target is another redirect; neither redirect is named at the second target. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Named at target. Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 19:34, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I bypassed the double redirect which the nominated redirect had, and updated the target in the nomination. Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. "Less is more" is nearly synonymous with "more is less", and it's easy to misremember one as the other. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:06, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I also found a source that describes both "more is less" and "less is more". jlwoodwa (talk) 23:14, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:55, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Iconoclasm in the United Kingdom during the George Floyd protests → Actions against memorials in Great Britain during the George Floyd protests  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Even though that's what this article used to be called, the destruction of likenesses typically isn't called iconoclasm unless such attacks are religiously motivated. This redirect may leave curious readers who type "iconoclasm" into the search bar with the unsubstantiated impression that the attacks carried out against secular memorials (on behalf of secular causes like Black Lives Matter) may be religious in nature. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 18:07, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep Article was created June 12, 2020 and moved from this title June 13, 2020, so no strong argument to keep it for specifically historical reasons. On the other hand, the comparison to iconoclasm has been made repeatedly, e.g. UChicago divinity school article, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology issue, De Grutyer blog (my search). Overall, the usage exists and we aren't originating it, and I don't think it's actually incorrect - our article has it defined as "most frequently for religious or political reasons", and this is definitely a political reason. On the other hand, this exact phrase seems like an unlikely search term and I don't think there's a particularly strong benefit to having it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Iconoclasm can be for political reasons. We have an article titled French Revolution Iconoclasm, which would be better titled "Iconoclasm in the French Revolution" – in which case another example of political iconoclasm would appear when one types "iconoclasm" into the search bar. It's unfortunate that the "Actions against memorials..." article was moved from its original, more WP:CONCISE title. Ham II (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both as a {{R from move}} and for being an accurate description of the article contents. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Helstinky → Helsinki  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

this doesn't seem like a joke common enough to warrant a redirect (even after pyrocynical's cruelty squad video), and neither does "hellstinky". funny, but not exactly plausible cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The top hit for me on google is actually a ferret. Thryduulf (talk) 10:51, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Multiply transitive group action. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 23:13, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Multiply transitive → Mathieu group#Multiply transitive groups  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Multiply transitive group action appears to be the more general concept. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is a clear case for changing the target. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:19, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Caine (video game character) → Final Fight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

with all due respect, who? he's not mentioned in the target, and it doesn't seem like there are any other caines from video games that i should know about either, and this seems to be used as its own name more often than as an alternative spelling of "cain", so what to do? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned in the target article. --Un assiolo (talk) 13:36, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:09, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• May (video game character) → Final Fight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Dave (video game character) → Final Fight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Drake (video game character) → Final Fight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Freddie (video game character) → Final Fight  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Hugo (video game character) → Street Fighter III#Introduced in 2nd Impact  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

those are names. common ones, too. what happens if, say, pokémon has a may and drake (in the same games, no less), off has a hugo, fnaf has a freddy (yeah, wikipedia just clumps those two spellings together), and there are at least more daves than i can count with one finger? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:31, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

on second thought, why did i even nominate those, i could have just retargeted them myself like i did with makoto (video game character) 4 minutes before getting started on this. is this a good time for a speedy keep/retarget? cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 20:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No one else has commented on this, so withdrawal is an option. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 03:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Turbo HD → Super Street Fighter II Turbo HD Remix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

vague term, apparently mostly used for cameras cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:18, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

should also mention hd remix, a seemingly vague term, which ssf2thdr seems to be the primary topic of by... a lot. not nominating it though cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 16:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Super Turbo → Super Street Fighter II Turbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

a vague term with no clear primary topic (or at least not one that has an article), and doesn't seem to be a common abbreviation for ssf2t outside of street fighter discussions cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 14:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Leaning "weak keep"; but I'll add a harmless hatnote pointing to Frog#Reproduction to head off any confusion, Thanks. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 01:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Girl Toad → List of Mario franchise characters#Toadette  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target. This term is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia either. Mia Mahey (talk) 19:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep as plausible {{R from incorrect name}}. Steel1943 (talk) 19:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Girl Toad" is more likely to refer to a female toad than a fictional Mario character. Mia Mahey (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  "Girl" is an anthropomorphic word, so not likely. Steel1943 (talk) 20:50, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  No more likely to refer to the Mario franchise Toads than real toads. Mia Mahey (talk) 21:19, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The "Toad" characters in the Mario franchise are anthropomorphic; actual toads are not. Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: reasonable search term. C F A 💬 20:06, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The only mentions of "Girl Toad" on Wikipedia are those related to this discussion, suggesting that this is not a reasonable search term. Mia Mahey (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That doesn't really matter. It could still be a reasonable search term even if it isn't mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Someone could type "Girl Toad" into the search bar. It has received 700 page views throughout its history, suggesting it has been used at least a few times. Regardless, redirects are cheap. No reason this should be deleted. C F A 💬 23:25, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Unless a mention on the target can be added with a reliable source, this redirect should be deleted, as there is currently no information about "Girl Toad" on Wikipedia. Mia Mahey (talk) 23:31, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  It is still a reasonable search term, whether or not it is mentioned in the target article. C F A 💬 23:33, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Please provide a reliable source that uses "Girl Toad" referring to Toadette. Otherwise, this redirect is WP:OR and should be deleted. Mia Mahey (talk) 23:34, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Sure, it may be synthesis to a certain extent, but redirects are not required to be "correct" or neutral. If you google "girl toad", the first result is Toadette, indicating it is the correct target and a plausible search term. C F A 💬 23:39, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The Google Search results for "girl toad" are not from reliable sources. Half of them are unrelated to Toadette. Mia Mahey (talk) 23:51, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I didn't say they were, but it still shows that it is a plausible search term. If you really think this is an issue, I would also support a disambiguation page with Toadette and Toad (frog). C F A 💬 23:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the redirect seems vague. there are other distinctly female toads, mostly in the rpgs. it's like if "female human" redirected to hillary clinton or something. for now, i'd say return to red until zess t. is covered cogsan _{(nag me) (stalk me)} 13:47, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I think it's plausible search term for those who forgot the name Toadette. The title is capitalized (WP:DIFFCAPS), indicating a proper noun, and "girl" is an anthromorphic term. Wikipedia has no article on any fictional female toads. Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Google results seems split about 50/50 between various real-life female frogs and Toadette. We also don't have any content of female toads in particular, the cloests is Frog#Reproduction. Rusalkii (talk) 19:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It may be a WP:NEO but this has been there since 2007, and may have been responsible for some of the Google results. Someone looking for female toads wouldn't get anything specific on enwiki. A female frog redirect may be created, but there are several mentions at frog, and may not really be a useful one. Jay 💬 11:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 00:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Yottapixel image → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Yottapixel → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Zettapixel image → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Zettapixel → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Exapixel image → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Exapixel → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Petapixel image → Gigapixel image  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Not mentioned in target, and contents of the gigapixel article doesn't contain any technical relevance that would be applicable to peta-, exa-, zetta-, or yottapixel images. The size difference between a gigapixel image and a yottapixel image is huge - printed at 300dpi (standard magazine quality print), a gigapixel image would be about the size of a kingsize bed, while a yottapixel image would have about the same surface area as Neptune, and (if stored at 24bits/pixel) would require 6000x the storage capacity of all of AWS to store it as a png.

Note: Petapixel was recently listed at RFD and deleted, but that had different circumstances because of the existence of the unrelated article PetaPixel. BugGhost🦗👻 15:50, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These seem like plausible search terms; someone may be curious to see if these higher designations exist or are used for anything. jp×g🗯️ 00:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I still feel the same way I felt about the previous RfD. Basically, if some sci-fi or otherwise speculative writer mentions an absurdly large SI-prefix referring to the size of an image, then the reader should be able to look up the concept of "absurdly large image" on wikipedia, even if the exact level of "absurdly large" is not specifically mentioned. Fieari (talk) 00:13, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 14:52, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I find Fieari's argument convincing. Thryduulf (talk) 18:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per WP:PANDORA and the fact that these aren't common things to exist right now. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I implore you to read lunamann's essay. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 16:29, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  WP:PANDORA is misleading nonsense that contradicts WP:OTHERSTUFF and causes far more harm than the redirects it advocates deleting. How common these images are is irrelevant - what matters is that people who want to read about them can find the relevant article. Thryduulf (talk) 20:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (but keep Petapixel) with a potential exception for Petapixel image if well-sourced information about petapixel (e.g. 40M x 25M) images in particular can be found anywhere within the mainspace. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 19:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the previous RfD, especially the nom's comment at the previous RfD. Jay 💬 10:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Tracel → Parenteral nutrition#minerals  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Useless redirect. The redirect points to a non-existent paragraph. That could be corrected. However, the target string 'tracel' is nowhere found on the page, and there is no obvious reference to a drug trade name. Recommend Deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:48, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now as it is confusing. I'm getting hits from different companies ranging from AI to agriculture in my GSearch --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was turned into article. Closing this one early, since there's now a stub of an article here. Any further discussion can take place on the article talk page. (non-admin closure) asilvering (talk) 01:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Cock (slang) → Dick (slang)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This should be deleted. An {{r from synonym}} in this instance is misleading, as the target is a WP:WORDISSUBJECT article that doesn’t mention this title at all, and cock has a separate etymology from "dick". I do not think a retarget to penis is desirable; "cock" may well be a notable word itself. Mach61 00:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Create a Cock (slang) article. This seems to be common sense, as it is fairly universally known, and like Dick (slang), has a number of related senses that can be explored. The New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English alone has five full pages on it. I have drafted a few lines on the page. BD2412 T 02:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC) BD2412 T 02:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).