The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rudnichny City District, Prokopyevsk → Prokopyevsk  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:36, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rudnichny City District, Kemerovo → Kemerovo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Saray-Chekurcha, Republic of Tatarstan → Tatarstan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned on target article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per WP:G7. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Zheleznodorozhnogo razyezda Saray-Chekurcha → Tatarstan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:28, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll willing to turn my own tides in your favor. Therefore Delete, as the page never caught on. -iaspostb□x+ 00:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Reasonable person#Reasonable woman. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 01:49, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Reasonable Woman → Sia discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There is no confirmation the album is being released or will go by this name --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• retarget to Reasonable_person#Reasonable_woman. Seems to be the most plausible target --Lenticel ^(talk) 01:49, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:TOOSOON. If it is a potential album then a redirect of this capitalisation to Reasonable person would be confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Sia's confirmed the title, Reasonable Woman, see here. Until more details are known about the album, a separate article for the album is TOOSOON, however a redirect to her discography page is okay for now.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:02, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Too soon to redirect to any page associated with the artist, IMO. I understand Sia said this one thing once in passing, but a million things could change before the project comes to fruition. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Lenticel. Seems to be the best option, at least for now. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Lenticel. (It's also the subtitle of one of A. P. Herbert's Misleading Cases, published in Uncommon Law though not mentioned in that article - link.) Narky Blert (talk) 08:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:04, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Absinthee → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Adam Christian → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Aïboforcen → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Andreas Menge → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Anne Hadlock → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Benoît Blanchart → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] Redirected to Alfa Matrix. -Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me}

• Biohazard PCB → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Bob Davidson (bassist) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Brian Naughton → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Chako → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Cook (musician) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Crimson Joy (band) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• David Cerequas → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Eamon Collier → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Edera (band) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Ed Vargo (musician) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Ivan Hart → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Jeremy Lightfoot → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Jim Retterer → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Joe Rolland → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Josh Recap → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Karl Schulz (musician) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Lucifer Scale → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Marilyn Monroe (band) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Numeralia → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Olaf Lupp → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Peter Wizki → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Santeria (band) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Séba Dolimont → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] Redirected to Alfa Matrix. -Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me}

• Sheena Colbath → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Static (musician) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Strap on Halo → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Usherhouse → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Usherhouse (band) → Cleopatra Records  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A set of musicians and groups that aren't mentioned at the target article. They are non-notable acts who may be signed to the label and whose only mentions on Wikipedia are on a compilation or two put out by the label, such as the recently created The Black Bible and This Is Goth!, but offer no other info. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:49, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom, and, where notable, to encourage article creation. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:31, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: redirects aren't useful if there is no information about the subject at the target page. If the acts really are notable they would have their own articles and not require redirects to be specifically created. Richard3120 (talk) 19:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ostralia → Australia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible redirect. Besides, we don't have the redirects "Ostralian", "Ostralians", and "Ostralias". Seventyfiveyears at 19:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – Fonemik misspelling of Australia. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 05:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Implausible mispelling of Orstrylia. Narky Blert (talk) 05:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A very unlikely misspelling, no need for keeping this. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep It's a plausible stab at a phonetic spelling of the country. WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST is not a valid argument; it could just as easily mean that the other redirects should be created. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:10, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix – for someone who had encountered the country's name in conversation but not know how to spell it, this is the most plausible guess. Gets views. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Humorous misspelling. Nobody would expect to find Australia searching under this name.--Grahame (talk) 02:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Then we should delete Yurop as a humorous misspelling. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 06:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. It’s quite pointless to make such comparisons, just because Yurop exists doesn’t mean other similar redirects should also exist. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, please stop these red herring WP:OTHERSTUFF statements as this is definitely not the first time you've done this, and they serve no purpose in the discussion. If you want to start a separate discussion for the other redirect, go for it, but keep the WP:OTHERSTUFF statements out of them. Steel1943 (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete About 9.4 pageviews/month, versus 553k for the target. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • 9 pageviews a month is indicative that this redirect generates use – and per above, those who use it are helped. So, what is to be gained by deleting this redirect? — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 21:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Singpore → Singapore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Singapoor → Singapore  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Both of those redirects are implausible. They are also not even a close spelling to their target name. Seventyfiveyears at 19:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Both plausible misspellings. One has an easily missed vowel syllable, and the other is a phonetic misspelling. Steel1943 (talk) 19:20, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep both. "Singpore" is a plausible misspelling, and "Singapoor" is a C19 spelling (link). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narky Blert (talk • contribs) 06:01, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  My tilde key must have gone AWOL. Narky Blert (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the above. Plausible misspellings and alternative spellings are useful. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:12, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Singapoor per Narky and Singpore because in informal conversation the middle, unstressed syllable is often ignored. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 20:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as plausible misspellings and tag with {{R from misspelling}}. CaptainGalaxy 21:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by Fastily per criterion R2. The content and edit history formerly at this title can be found at Draft:Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Maddam Sir – Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai → Maddam Sir  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Improbable search term. Currently a redirect, after an inexperienced editor copy/pasted the article contents from another page.

Nobody in their right mind is going to be searching for the TV series "Maddam Sir" by using the title plus its tagline. There are five Google News hits for the title+tagline, and over 3000 for for "Maddam Sir". So the correct WP:COMMONTITLE is Maddam Sir, and that's where the article should go, and that's what most people are going to search for. Dubious that we need a redirect to this other article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The first reference specifically mentions the term. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:49, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I understand the logic of this !vote. I'm not denying that the phrase exists. Kuch Baat Hai Kyunki Jazbaat Hai is a tagline, as indicated in the source you mention above. It would be like having a redirect from "Alien - In Space No One Can Hear You Scream" or "The Big Lebowski - They Figured He Was a Lazy, Time Wasting Slacker. They Were Right." Who's ever going to type that? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Lists of sponges. And we're done! (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of sponges → Sponge  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No such list at target. Interesting though is that the is a more WP:PRECISE-ly titled article with a more precise scope: List of sponges of South Africa. Steel1943 (talk) 17:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Ireland and Venezuela have lists too. Would it be crazy to retarget to a new Lists of sponges? It could give these three geographic lists and link to sponge in the opening sentence. --BDD (talk) 21:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @BDD:. I agree and have created the list of lists. Let's go crazy. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Lists of sponges. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:35, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Nanay Baby → Lilia Pineda  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Nothing in the target discusses this. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep: Vice Governor Lilia Pineda used this nickname. They have sources with "Nanay Baby" on it. Just search for it on Google. Rdp060707 (talk) 07:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with thanks to Rdp060707 who included a reference in the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Shhhnotsoloud, i accepted your word.

Let's see, i have this:

Nanay Baby, environmental protector [[1]]

Happy Birthday Nanay [[2]]

So, that means it is true. Rdp060707 (talk) 12:55, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. Nanay Baby is the nickname of Lilia Pineda, so where is the proof of deleting this redirect? Seventyfiveyears at 18:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wineaux → Wino  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect is neither mentioned nor found in the "Wino" disambiguation page. Seventyfiveyears at 15:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Plural of the faux-French homonym wineau, which is a redlink (and so it should remain). Narky Blert (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete to enable uninhibited Search, where you will find a minor mention of "Wineaux Fest" but nothing else. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:27, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:25, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Misuri → Missouri  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible redirect, not even a close spelling to its target name. Seventyfiveyears at 14:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep per previous discussion. It is a fonemik misspelling of Missouri (see the RfD of Yurop). --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 14:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Previoius discussion of a list of these misspellings was closed as WP:TRAINWRECK with instructions to individually nominate each item. That keep does not set a precedent for this one, it needs to be decided on its own merits. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Two spelling errors in one word is too many. Narky Blert (talk) 16:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I !voted for procedural close in the previous nomination. Narky Blert (talk) 16:19, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment this is the correct Spanish spelling (see e.g. Rio Misuri or wikt:Misuri), though I don't have any opinion if there's a strong enough WP:FORRED connection to keep this or whether it's worth a mention at Missouri#Etymology and pronunciation. Separately, it's an old unit of volume used in Naples (see Italian units of measurement#Volume (dry)). 59.149.124.29 (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as both a phonetically plausible misspelling in English and also the correct name in the country's second most spoken language. The unit of measure mentioned above appears to be mesura (plural mesure, of which I would venture to guess mesuri is either a misspelling or a regional variant), but at any rate this is one obscure unit among dozens of others mentioned in the same article, so obscure in fact that I don't see a need to incorporate a mention of it into hatnotes or dab pages. – Uanfala (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The country? It's a subnational unit. Hog Farm _Bacon 21:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish is the second most spoken language in the country where Missouri is. I don't know what is the second most spoken language in Missouri. – Uanfala (talk) 00:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish is the second most spoken language in Missouri with around 146,000 speakers or about 2.65% of the population in 2010. -- Tavix ^(talk) 13:33, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Uanfala. Missouri#Language is surprisingly disappointing with regards to the Spanish language, but there is a historical link from Louisiana (New Spain). -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:41, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Lilly 101 → Zoey 101  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect is old, but without a mention in the target article, remains as incomprehensible as the day it was created on 11 May 2010. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:48, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This redirect started as an article about a fanfic based on the Zoey 101 series but instead of deleting the article as nonsense or a hoax, it was redirected to an article with no mention of this fan created spinoff. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete likely hoax per Geraldo Perez. Chompy Ace 23:26, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 00:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Software Entertainment Company → Dynamix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Common name. Can't find anything connected with this particular company. - The9Man ^(Talk) 11:35, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MobyGames: "Dynamix Inc. was located in Eugene, Oregon. Originally, the company was named Software Entertainment Company," --Mika1h (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and tag {{R from former name}}, per User:Mika1h's reference. While Software entertainment company may be a common name, the capitalized version would reasonably be referring to this company, unless there are other notable companies/topics with the same name. —Ost (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of twin towns and sister cities in The Netherlands → List of twin towns and sister cities in the Netherlands  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This redirect contains a miscapitalisation of the article "the" and no longer serves a purpose. gidonb (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I don't see this as being unreasonable. It's an understandable error, as a user who thinks that the "the" is part of the official name might think it needs capitalized. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:21, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Hog Farm and K4, as an {{R from move}} that generates a lot of visits. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 02:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I might have tagged it as {{R from other capitalisation}} not {{R from miscapitalisation}}, but it's all the same. Absolutely routine variant, just like (off the top of my head) Game Of Thrones. Narky Blert (talk) 09:05, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Game Of Thrones is allcaps. This isn't. gidonb (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above. It's a plausible mispelling, so there's no proof of deleting this redirect. Seventyfiveyears at 14:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Capitalized "The" is quite plausible since "The Netherlands" can be seen to be the name of the country. Steel1943 (talk) 19:23, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:24, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Middle-earth rivers → Geography of Middle-earth  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There is no list of Middle-earth rivers anywhere on Wikipedia that I'm aware of. The old history of this article was deleted as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Middle-earth rivers (2nd nomination), so this redirects dates only to December 2019 and has no substantive page history, it's only ever been a redirect. Hog Farm _Bacon 23:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom. GimliDotNet (talk) 19:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:RHARMFUL (second bullet). I actually agree with the logic behind the nomination, but it looks like this redirect is still getting quite a bit of use—possibly from external sites. -2pou (talk) 22:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The original list was deleted. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 16:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as there is no trace of any list of Middle-earth rivers in enwiki. I therefore see no benefit in keeping this. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:48, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Tea bag movement → Tea Party movement  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not finding anything that suggests this is a common misnomer for the organization. Hog Farm _Bacon 22:34, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned in target article, and "teabagging" is rather vulgar slang for a sexual practice. Softlavender (talk) 02:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This just isn't a way that the Tea Party movement is commonly referred to... Aza24 (talk) 07:54, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a misnomer, and I first read the redirect title as something related to the term mentioned by Softlavender. OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:16, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another possibility is to retarget to Tea Party movement#"Teabagger". OcelotCreeper (talk) 20:19, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and refine to Tea Party movement#"Teabagger". Nothing wrong with providing for such terms when we have coverage of them (cf. Democrat Party (epithet)). --BDD (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - just doesn't seem a likely search to me. 'Teabagger' is mentioned in the article, but I'm not sure anyone called it the 'Tea Bag Movement'. Robofish (talk) 18:33, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per BDD. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:24, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per BDD. CaptainGalaxy 21:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and retarget to Tea Party movement#"Teabagger" per above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:45, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Star Wars 7 1/2 → Star Wars: The Force Awakens  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The title of the word "1/2" is not mentioned in target article, and is implausible and confusing. See section #Star Wars one and a halves for more. The redirect was created as the redirect which targets to Rogue One. Chompy Ace 13:42, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To editor Chompy Ace: I moved this discussion lower to be grouped next to the others. I didn't feel good merging since one already garnered some !votes, and this one had not. If an admin sees no issue, perhaps they will.

• Delete confusing, made-up, and not worth keeping per nom. -2pou (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. MBisanz ^talk 15:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Star Wars VII 1/2 → Rogue One  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Star Wars Episode VII 1/2 → Rogue One  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• Star Wars Episode 7 1/2 → Rogue One  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"1/2" redirects are neither a sequel or extension to the seventh film of the Skywalker saga, Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens, and it is false imformation. Therefore, Rogue One: A Star Wars Story is a standalone anthology film. I searched "Star Wars Episode 7 1/2" on Google Search, and it says which contains pure content about The Force Awakens. Chompy Ace 08:29, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Chronologically, this film has been accepted to have taken place between "3" and "4", meaning a number such as "3 1/2" would be plausible, but certainly not "7 1/2". Steel1943 (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Implausible and likely to cause confusion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete confusing, made-up, and not worth keeping per nom. -2pou (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If this was at least correct, it would be Episode 3 1/2. CaptainGalaxy 21:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.