The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep most, delete those referring to the other game. --BDD (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DDR MAX → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR 6th mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

• DDR 6th Mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR 7th mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR 7th Mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddr 7th mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddrmax2 → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddr max2 → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddr max 2 → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddrmax 2 → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Ddr 6th mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR MAX: Dance Dance Revolution 6thMIX → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR MAX: Dance Dance Revolution 6th Mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• DDR MAX2: Dance Dance Revolution 7th Mix → DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

DDR MAX, DDR 6th mix, DDR 6th Mix, DDR 7th mix, DDR 7th Mix, Ddr 7th mix, Ddrmax2, Ddr max2, Ddr max 2, Ddrmax 2, Ddr 6th mix, DDR MAX: Dance Dance Revolution 6thMIX, DDR MAX: Dance Dance Revolution 6th Mix and DDR MAX2: Dance Dance Revolution 7th Mix are all implausible typos and/or variants of DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix that do not merit individual pages or redirects. The Search function is more than enough to retrieve the proper page. I suggest that all these trivial redirects be deleted, as maintenance is a burden. --LABcrabs (talk) 00:39, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all as redirects are WP:cheap, and none of these are implausible. Iffy★Chat -- 08:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  That's fine. I personally find it messy, as some of them are simply capitalization or spacing variants, but if it's not an issue for Wikipedia, so be it. I did change them all to redirect to DDRMAX Dance Dance Revolution 6thMix instead of List of Dance Dance Revolution games, and so I'd be fine with the redirects staying under that condition. --LABcrabs (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  Alternatively, retarget the max2 and 7th mix ones to DDRMAX2 Dance Dance Revolution 7thMix (and undo the merge that happened there), or to List of Dance Dance Revolution games. Iffy★Chat -- 12:48, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the "7th" ones as misleading.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  If the 7th ones are to be deleted, then the max2 ones should be deleted too for the same reason as max2 and 7th mix are the same version. Iffy★Chat -- 09:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Create DDRMAX2 Dance Dance Revolution 7thMix and split off the 7th mix information from the 6th mix page. Retarget DDRMAX2 and 7th mix to that page. There's already a succession box for 7th mix so it's a legit product, [1] with a major rename afterwards for DDRMAX3 8th mix. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep all. They are mentioned in the article, so unless split, these should stay. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:46, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep the redirects specific to the target game. Delete the 7th/2 redirects per WP:REDLINK to encourage an article on that game. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:18, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. With no mention of this at gag name, there's no point targeting these redirects there. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Sue of cide → Suicide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Sue of side → Suicide  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] Added by -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be a reasonable typo for suicide... although it is humorous... Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – the “s” spelling seems to be a typo that some people make.^[2] Interqwark ^{talk contribs} 13:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It appears to be a gag name. Sue of side also redirects to suicide. Should those go to gag name or the subject in question? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  I would oppose pointing this to Gag name. It's not mentioned there, and probably shouldn't be. --BDD (talk) 03:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete not likely, and remindes me of grade school humor. --Bejnar (talk) 22:11, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 19:15, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - yeah, it's hilarious... - ^theWOLFchild 01:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• 2018 FINA Swimming World Cup → FINA Swimming World Cup  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention in the target article. Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep it's scheduled for this year: [3] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Someone searching for information on the 2018 edition will not find it at the target. -- Tavix ^(talk) 03:25, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Overwrite with an article. From a quick google search it looks like there is plenty enough information to create a basic article about when and where it will be held, and a little bit of background about about the event. And that's without looking to see if anybody has qualified yet. Thryduulf (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article can be created from the redirect. Not a big deal, unless it needs TNT for authorship? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:03, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article has only ever been a redirect, and has a grand total of 2 edits including the nomination here - why would this need to be deleted? WP:TNT is for situations where an article needs to be fundamentally rewritten from the ground up, not for replacing redirects with articles - that's just part of the normal editing process. Thryduulf (talk) 23:06, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Reject as moot for now. Many past instances of this competition have articles and the 2018 competition is definitely happening. Let's think about deletion again if nobody writes anything substantial about this year's competition by the end of the year. Deryck C. 16:25, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 04:48, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Poppyseed → Wikipedia:Removing administrator rights  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

See no relationship to request de-adminiship B dash (talk) 10:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The only incoming link unrelated to this RfD is User talk:Drmies/Archive 96#Thought for the day which also provides the explanation: Ritchie333 wrote "Did you know ... that if you right-click on the word "desysopped" in an edit window on Google Chrome, it suggests it's a typo of "poppyseed". Isn't that nicer?" and Lectonar created the redirect as a direct result. We rightly give shortcut redirects a very wide lattitude, but this one is unused in links and all-but unused in terms of hits, so it's probably best for it to be available for some future thing to use where it will make sense. Thryduulf (talk) 13:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Unless you read the discussion in Drmies' archive then this would never make sense to anyone ..... –Davey2010^Talk 21:43, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete it’s too obscure a reference.--76.65.41.59 (talk) 23:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. as lacking sufficient basis, also implausible. --Bejnar (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 15:39, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Oh no you didn't → Wikipedia:Removing administrator rights  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

See no relationship to request de-adminiship B dash (talk) 10:42, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete unless someone can come up with a reason to keep it. It has no incomming links unrelated to this RfD and there is nothing else I've found that could explain it. Thryduulf (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Someone was being a smartass. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 18:27, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.