Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Naraka (Hinduism)/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 20:22, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria as it has several uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. The "Descriptions of hell" section also reads like a list, negatively affecting readability in this article for mobile users and might be better formatted. I also do not think the lead summarises all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Delist. No edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:44, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delist. The "Narrative, social and economic functions" section contains only a single citation, and parts of the article (especially the "Number and names" and "Description of hells" sections) read like lists. A number of the paragraphs are also too short, affecting readability. – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.