Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/John Henry Turpin/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Kept. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
I wouldn't say this article goes in-depth; there was a ton of uncited info a few days earlier and now it's very short. I was waiting until after it was on the POTD to do this, as I don't want to be a party-pooper. :) EF5 18:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- I was waiting for a week after I posted to the talk page, but yes, delist per nom. charlotte 👸♥ 20:05, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @EF5 and Queen of Hearts: "very short" is not a reason to delist an article, unless it is shown that the article does not cover the main aspects of the subject. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already fix a few thing. I think the reassessment can be canceled Agus Damanik (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing any glaring issues remaining, and as AirshipJungleman29 says length on its own is not a failure reason assuming it's beyond a stub (and this article is about 600 words so easily long enough). I think this can probably be kept. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.