Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

The article might be well written. However, there are visible issues such as unsourced sentences. Additionally, ref 41 is unnecessary, and it should be cited as Behind the Voice Actors instead of bundling it with primary sources; ref 42's website does not show anything and should probably be removed or replaced. The quotes in the citations are mostly irrelevant, especially when the sources are cited in the reception section, like for example. ref 86. Lastly, most of the sources at reception were from game reviews. It wouldn't hurt to expand some necessary sources on the article's talkpage, particularly these [1] [2] per GA's criteria "Broad in its coverage". 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 02:32, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just got a start on making those adjustments. Hoping to get more done soon, namely when I get a retool of the Appearances section figured out. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:41, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]