Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Anglesey Central Railway/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:55, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The article contains uncited statements, including the entire "Route" section. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. The "Reopening" section contains many short, one sentence paragraphs; this section should be formatted more effectively with longer paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Leaning towards a delist on this one. There's a self-published source tag on one of the references, a dead link tag on another, ref 34 is citing a timetable on display at a museum, rather than simply the timetable itself with its proper information (publisher, page, etc), I have no idea if "International Good Guys" is a reliable source (ref 44), ref 45 is to a self-published personal website and does not meet GA standards, and refs like 64 (and indeed much of what is cited to Rear) appear to tread into original research, and the external links clearly violate WP:ELNO. All of this is on top of the concerns noted in the nomination. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 03:08, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.