Jennifer Parlevliet (talk||history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Olympian who is also in the Equestrian Victoria Hall of Fame. I don't think sufficient research past a basic google search was done. Australian newspaper coverage online is very poor from the 1990s due to highly concentrated media ownership and tightly held copyright. Should be draftified as a minimum, or redirected to the olympic event she competed in. The-Pope (talk) 16:05, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you try asking the closing admin for a draft to work on? Owen× ☎ 16:36, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Asking the closing admin for a draft is going to be the best result I feel, I did my own WP:BEFORE search and could not find any significant coverage of her that wasn't the Equestrian Victoria Hall of Fame, but if you can find sources draft space will be the best option. SportingFlyer T·C 16:58, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I notified them as per the instructions of point #2 of not section of WP:DRVPURPOSE. The-Pope (talk) 13:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore to draft based on The-Pope’s good faith request to recreate this page with SIGCOV that may or may not exist. Best case, coverage is incorporated and the draft is accepted at AFC. Worst case, minimal or no SIGCOV is found and the draft will be abandoned and eventually G13ed, which is not a big deal at all. Frank Anchor 18:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse the close, and advise the appellant that they may fix it by creating a redirect, creating a draft, or submitting a draft for review. The title was not salted, and permission from DRV is not required to create and submit a draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert McClenon (talk • contribs)
  • I'm not an admin, so I can't see what was in the deleted article. I'd like to work from that, with the full edit history, not start from scratch. The-Pope (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • You're going to be disappointed. It cited basically nothing, was four sentences long, and managed to fit at least two inaccuracies into them. —Cryptic 18:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse Nom is making an argument to keep the article, not an argument that the closer read the consensus wrong. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 22:22, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:DRVPURPOSE point 3: "if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page" No one mentioned that she's in a hall of fame during the AfD. The nominator also incorrectly claimed that she "didn't even compete in the individual Olympic event", when she did. It was a minimal AfD at best, IMO. The-Pope (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • It says "She did not even complete the individual event", which is accurate according to the least trivial source in the deleted article. —Cryptic 18:28, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Endorse, no other way to close it and DRV#3 is limited to significant new info, which being in some HoF is not. JoelleJay (talk) 21:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]