Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 March 13

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2011-03-13

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
As I understand it, there was an attempt to resolve the license problem at http://www.pamelaevans.org.uk/biog.php by changing the license on the page. However, the license was changed to a CC BY-NC-SA 3.0, which doesn't permit commercial use. The article was appropriately blanked pending resolution. I see that the site now has a CC SA 3.0 unported license, so that should be OK, right? There is a note at the talk page suggesting that GFDL is also required. Is this true?--SPhilbrickT 00:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was mistaken in thinking that GFDL was also required, I've just clarified with User:Moonriddengirl that CC-BY-SA is fine in this case. January (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Eh. Maybe an overuse of quotations, but I agreed that the article in general needed work. Rather than quibbling with the tag, I just gave it the work it needed. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:48, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]