The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wurtland Church of God (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No assertion of notability. MidgleyDJ (talk) 09:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• delete plus it reads like an advert. Darrenhusted (talk) 10:47, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete promotional article; some of the content is about a denomination, and is copied from Church of God (Charleston, Tennessee), which Wurtland Church of God is probably part of, and the rest looks like it is about a church, which does not appear to be notable, and not about a denomination of churches. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 11:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I linked to the wrong denomination, should have been Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee). --Snigbrook ^(talk) 00:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete as advertising Jasynnash2 (talk) 11:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• After all, we need to delete this promotional article. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 12:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because it is a promo piece (with phrases such as "Our history", etc.). The only reason I would vote to keep the article is because of its alleged large denomination (although seven million is uncited, failing WP:V). Happyme22 (talk) 22:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • that figure is taken from Church of God (Cleveland, Tennessee). On the Wurtland Church of God article it also says in the infobox it has "300+ members" which is not particularly large. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 00:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. —Orlady (talk) 13:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.