White Hot Room (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the article is just WP:FANCRUFT. A WP:BEFORE search yield no WP:RS source talking about the character. WP:CBR and ScreenRant is not a source to determine reliability per WP:VALNET. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 10:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed what I believe was a bunch of the cruft. That link says that ScreenRant is "marginally reliable" so I believe those citations are fine, but I also added some more additional citations from non-CBR and non-ScreenRant sources. How does it read now? Alliterator85 (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Comics and animation. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect/Merge to Phoenix Force per WP:NOPAGE - The Phoenix Force is the primary topic here, and I'm not seeing any sources that would justify having a separate article. It is already mentioned throughout the Phoenix Force article, but its not really explained well there, so a few sentences explaining what it is could probably stand to be merged to the "Fictional Character Biography" section to add some context. Rorshacma (talk) 08:06, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Rorschacma. The coverage indicates this is mostly a part of that topic. Not enough distinct WP:SIGCOV for its own article. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Rorschacma. Non-notable concept that has no notability independent of the Pheonix Force. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 23:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]