The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete: A7, no claim of notability ("the Def Leppard of the indoor soccer world" notwithstanding, your local amateur team is a bad article idea). --Kinu ^t/_c 16:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thy Battlers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A non-notable social indoor football team. A contested PROD, with reason for contesting left on the talk page Mattinbgn/ ^talk 11:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn/ ^talk 11:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - page created on some blokes local indoor team. Twenty Years 11:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom Recurring dreams 12:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 12:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Super strong delete Yet another bunch of mates (in this case schoolboys) who play social soccer on a week-night at the local sports centre. Absolutely zero Google hits for the name of the team ChrisTheDude 12:28, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per nominator (and the team's name). - Dudesleeper · Talk 12:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's generally a good idea to list the criterion you are referencing when nominating for speedy deletion. The nominator did not request speedy deletion, so writing "Speedy delete per nom" really doesn't make any sense. --Cyrus Andiron 12:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The nominator, as you have below, mentioned its non-notability, hence my speedy-delete response (which is the same response you've given). - Dudesleeper · Talk 13:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you'll notice I listed the criteria: CSD A7. That would be the difference. --Cyrus Andiron 14:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, sneaky, that. - Dudesleeper · Talk 15:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as not notable and encyclopedic. John Vandenberg 12:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per nom. Orderinchaos 12:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - non notable. WATP  ^(talk) • _(contribs) 12:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete per CSD A7, non notable group. --Cyrus Andiron 12:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, CSD A7 --Angelo 14:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.