Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thekeenone
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:11, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thekeenone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears not to meet WP:MUSIC for notability Pol430 talk to me 23:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:19, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Does not appear to have produced two or more albums on a major label, and does not appear to meet any other notability points of WP:MUSICBIO. Does not appear to have received 'significant coverage' per the wider requirements of WP:GNG. Low G hits and GNews hits for both artist and albums. Pol430 talk to me 13:36, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not finding significant coverage on thekeenone or Amy Yanick in independent reliable sources. no claim to notability satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 06:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.