The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:37, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The greatest palaces of the world (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Forbes' opinion on the "greatest palaces" is not notable. It was a one-off in 2006, and aside from them only MSNBC mentioned this listing, and that article was a mirror of the Forbes piece.[1] We shouldn't write articles about every fluff piece in Forbes. Fences&Windows 15:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 15:27, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 15:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree per nominator. − Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 15:33, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per nominator: not notable. Otherwise has many issues: (1) title is misleading as it omits Forbes (2) Use of "greatest" is WP:WEASEL (3) Ranking appears to be a misinterpretation, not supported by the article. --Elekhh (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all. OSborn^arf_{contributionatoration} 17:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.