The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) czar · · 21:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Camp (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, can't find secondary coverage, deproded without reason BOVINEBOY2008 22:04, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 22:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. jonkerz ♠talk 22:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arabic/English:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arabic:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Comment: Small wonder the Find sources does not give results for this brand new film, as it is an Arabic language, Egyptian film. I will feel better waiting until an Arabic-reading Wikipedian comes forward to tell us that such as this is not about this Tamer Eissa film. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:35, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No coverage can be found, but I would not be against it being speedily restored if Arabic sources are found. SL93 (talk) 23:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per my own observations above, and per WP:CSB, WP:NF, and a number of independent Arabic sources speaking about this screened film.[1][2][3][4][5] The article and project will benefit from the attention of Arabic-reading Wikipedians who can properly translate the many Arabic language sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 16:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Update: As it is an Egyptian film that has not yet had a release in the United States the English version of its title gave LOTS of false positives. Trying more appropriate search parameters per its Arabic title "المخيم", I found that it did have coverage... and while the original version of this article had issues, the article has gone though improvements since the last "delete" vote up above. It still needs attention from Arabic-reading Wikipedians, but what we have now does serve the project. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 18:41, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I cannot vouch for the Arabic sources, but I shall assume good faith and deem them to be reliable. I think this meets our core notability guidelines but this sure needs a lil' clean-up. Cheers, ☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 11:47, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.