Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stine Holm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 18:32, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stine Holm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find anything to suggest that Holm can meet WP:GNG. There is no significant coverage in this article and I'm not finding anything better in searches. I found a transfer rumour, a transfer announcement and a brief announcement from her club about her leaving. This is WP:ROUTINE and does not count as significant in-depth coverage.

Players could get presumed notability through WP:SPORTCRIT if they have played in a major international competition at the highest level, but Holm hasn't played in the European Championship, nor the World Championship nor the Olympics. There is no evidence that she is a significantly notable figure within handball. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:16, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Handball-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:17, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They both look like routine transfer announcements to me. The first one provides a small bit of depth but I wouldn't say that any of them amount to WP:SIGCOV addressing her in detail. In other words, I'm not convinced that we can build a biography from what's available. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.