The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Station (roller coaster) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article breaches the WP:NOR and WP:GNG policies. Wackyike (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC) @Dom497, FirstDrop87, Astros4477, GoneIn60, Themeparkgc, and McDoobAU93: Do any of you have any opinions?Wackyike (talk) 14:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No sourcing, most likely an original composition. No place on Wikipedia. --McDoobAU93 14:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Agree with above. No source = No article! --GoneIn60 (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - This article is not notable for inclusion and does not include any references. Perhaps it could exist as a stub with just the basics? FirstDrop87 (talk) 23:40, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure there is enough sourced information to merit having its own article. It's probably better off as a small section within roller coaster or roller coaster elements. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with GoneIn60.--Dom497 (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.