Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Static/Crash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to The Mark Inside.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:17, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Static/Crash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any reliable sources covering the album (Google search). The only coverage mentioning the album title is this short music blog post and it's not significant coverage, just a passing mention. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 17:20, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to The Mark Inside. I found two reviews from Exclaim! ([1], [2]), a review from The Coast (newspaper) ([3]), and a few sentences about the album in a NOW article about the lead singer and guitarist ([4]). But all of that coverage is too brief to be significant. toweli (talk) 19:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This overall doesn't meet notability. Cyberpower7 (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and/or redirect. This, once again, is an old holdover from a time when Wikipedia extended an automatic presumption of notability to any album recorded by a notable band regardless of its sourcing or lack thereof, in the name of completionist directoryism — but that's long since been overturned, and an album now has to get over WP:GNG on its own steam. Bearcat (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.