The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:32, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sironta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article contains no assertion of notability. Furthermore, I am unable to find any verifiable sources related to the software. The article reads mainly as an advertisement, laying out a brief history (the software was just released in 2010 according to the article), and then listing features. No references, only links are to the download page, the official software page, and the company page that created it. Aka042 (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I am unable to find significant coverage for this software. - DustFormsWords (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I don't understand why you want to delete it, this article is similar to other collaborative software articles: Collanos, O3spaces, etc. The software was released on 2010, but they have worked on it since 2006, as the article says. It cannot be an advertise because it is open-source freeware. Marj9543 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
• Comment In answer to "I don't understand why you want to delete it", I should have thought that the answer was explained above: "I am unable to find any verifiable sources", "No references", "I am unable to find significant coverage". In answer to "this article is similar to ... Collanos, O3spaces, etc", the answer is that both those articles do cite sources to indicate notability. In answer to "It cannot be an advertise because it is open-source freeware", I suppose that depends on how you interpret the word "advertisement". If you take that word as referring only to advertising for commercial purposes then perhaps "promotion" would suit you better: either way the point is the same. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless evidence of notability can be produced: so far there is none. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Yes but all Collanos cited sources or references are from Collanos website, so don't worry, when I'll put the references when I have time for it, no more than one day. Marj9543 (talk)
• Delete. I think the project management spammers have concluded that the "project management" label isn't helpful, but this would appear to be more of the same: a P2P collaborative tool used for exchanging, creating and editing documents that require teamwork. This is still advertising: Sironta born from a need that Techideas team found since its inception. As a company that worked on different projects with different partners, it had severe problems to collaborate externally by sharing information, documents and simulations in an efficient manner without violating the confidentiality that such projects require. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I have already included the references and cover. Thanks for helping and making wikipedia better. Marj9543 (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.