The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:26, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shikha Talsania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- HindWiki^Connect 15:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Shikha Talsania is a budding film actress, daughter of a well established actor. The details in the article have been supported by sources and the sources are not of low-quality. I would request that the page should stay. There are other pages also where, there is a mention of this actress.

Thanks, Vikram Maingi (talk) 03:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Shikha Talsania qualifies to keep, this biography belongs to her not to the family and required more independent sources. @Vikram maingi , can keep after rewriting if qualifies WP:BIO. Genome$100 (talk) 13:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Nothing to suggest notability. Boomer Vial^{Happy Holidays! • Contribs} 07:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:ENT as the roles are small and non-significant. Hagennos (talk) 23:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.