Eisspeedway

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Senior Skip Day (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No mainstream notability - I've looked through a few searches in my native tongue and also can't find any mention. Given evidence below, this doesn't meet criteria for inclusion. m.o.p 01:07, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Senior Skip Day (film)

Senior Skip Day (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a straight to video movie. Although it has some notable people in it there does not seem to be anything that would make it meet Wikipedia:Notability (films). I can't find any significant coverage of it either so I don't believe it meets Wikipedia:Notability. BelovedFreak 16:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — BelovedFreak 16:21, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was first marked for deletion as "Can find no significant coverage in reliable sources"

1 - what kind of coverage is reliable enough ? The movie is already covered here : http://www.allmovie.com/work/187147 and here : http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/senior_skip_day/ what more external resources should i need to mark the movie as Notable ? 2 - Adding a plotline to the article would make it bettter though ? riddler (talk) 23:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The Allmovie link above is broken (it goes to a different film) and the Rotten Tomatoes link indicates that this film has received no reviews from any critics that Rotten Tomatoes surveys. A lack of attention to this film from mainstream media suggests to me that it has not attained notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

but i think it still would'nt make a difference since it still has no reviews at both sites so i guess it will be deleted, and i got the point now Delete riddler (talk) 06:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 06:22, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leave the article As for general evidences of its notability: a fact that the film is known at least in Poland (see interwiki) and was mentioned in local mass-media.

As for the other evidences of notability, its special merit is that this is a unique film that is dedicated to the phenomenon of Truancy, a serious and complicated issue in pedagogy. 93.80.100.2 (talk) 12:15, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, "known" in any country does not mean notable. The article in the Polish Wikipedia, and the one that has just appeared in the Russian Wikipedia, don't seem to say how the film is notable either. Being a film about truancy also does not make it notable. I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "mentioned in local mass-media", but if you have sources that would help demonstrate notability, please do add them to the article. If you're not familiar with wiki markup, you could always add them to the talkpage (Talk:Senior Skip Day (film)), so that someone else can add them.--BelovedFreak 16:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  18:12, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - I can't say I feel that strongly about this going, as is doesn't look like there's consensus to delete. I will just say though that I don't think those two links above are "significant" coverage of the film itself. Of the IMDb reviews, I'm not sure what criteria they have for picking them, maybe just any reviews they can find? I can't see how "Critical Critics" is reliable or notable - it looks lke anyone can write for them. 411mania - certainly a good lengthy review. I'm not 100% sure about notability/reliability of the site, but it looks better and might be one to add to the article. Dubbningshemsidan - really not sure what makes that a reliable source, to be honest. Seems to be a a self-published source, sounds like the guy may work in film dubbing, but no evidence of expertise (that I can see). Not at all sure what Filmstop is, but there's no coverage at that link anyway, just a list of films (not including Senior Skip Day unless it's under a different title). hometheaterinfo? Not sure if this is reliable or notable. Appears to be the work of one guy, a self-published source, with no evidence that he is some kind of expert. Scoopy.com - I can't tell how reliable or notable this is, it's certainly not clear form the site it is. So as far as the IMDb reveiws, the 411mania one may be useful, if it's deemed reliable. It's perhaps more telling that Rotten Tomatoes lists no reviews.--BelovedFreak 09:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. I've tried searching for sources in Polish and Russian (both of which I can read) and can find no reviews in reliable sources:
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Phil Bridger (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Quelle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Senior_Skip_Day_(film)