The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:09, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Richmond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of questionable notability. The only sources I was able to find was the subject's member profile on the subject's web forum. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 12:01, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable per WP:N. Only sources, as the nom said, were self-published or just a forum. Vacation9 12:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Dubious BLP, the sources on the article are fabricated by the person which this article is suppose to describe. This violate the principle of neutrality. Eduemoni^↑talk↓ 14:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:57, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.